Vocation and people with 'issues'

  • Thread starter Thread starter uglygal
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pre V2 certainly accepting applicants into religious orders was not as severe and rigidly selective as it now appears to be, simply because certainly postulancy and as I said to a lesser degree although certainly then too, the noviciate years were considered periods of discernment by leadership and the community of the candidate and suitability…and back then it seems the community was made of sterner and less neurotic stuff than to be disturbed by a discerner or postulant or novice who decided to leave - while I must admit back then it was looked at as something as a disgrace to leave a convent or monastery during the formation and discerning years, not only by the community and leadership themselves but also by one’s parish community and even one’s own family - but better to endure that than to try to live the life with no vocation, although many did, which is one good reason why we had the mass exodus after V2. Once it became common knowledge people were leaving and someone left or a few left in one’s own community, it no longer became unbearably painfu and disgraceful to be the one leaving - and many left relieved of the burden of disgrace that once had existed.
Some left because for many years they did not have to make any decisions at all, even small ones, as all decisions were made for them and once personal decision making became more the norm on both cloister and in convent, some no longer knew what the religious life was all about. Those that stayed were willing to let go of personal security and embark on the journey of exploration and experiment religious life could became…some communities of course refused to do even that and refused to modernize at all as the Holy Father had instructed - this is something that those who cry “Disobedient!” for those that have decided to abandoned the religious habit and old ways do not consider - that is their own disobedience.
Nowadays convents and monastics, one’s parish and one’s family are most often more understanding and accepting of a potential religious vocation or seminarian that decides to leave - it is more accepted post V2.

I sometimes wonder how many are turned away from cloister or seminary nowadays that really do have vocations and a call from God because of some quality that disturbs leadership for some reason… and some still accepted who become little more than career people in The Church as professed professionals rather than true religious or priests and nuns.

A prioress told me that she almost turned away a young woman as totally unsuitable who later proved to have reached a remarkably advanced level of contemplative prayer and living for her youthful age.

Bob Dylan wrote something else that put me into personal alert mode “foreign philosophies have polluted all your thoughts” and it immediately alerted me to the great interest psychology was presenting in the selection process re vocations and I think today far too much - and also to a certain degree in spirituality…we are allowing psychology and psychiatry in some instances to pollute our thinking. We need to remember that the spiritual life and way is about a relationship with the God who is not ruled by rules and certainly not human ones!

Sometimes I am struck by people who know all the ‘fancy’ words and thoughts, but perhaps not really aware of what they are actually saying and thinking - or I tell myself “Surely not!”.

Bears some thought!http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/15/15_8_11.gif…but then I have ‘issues’😃 …not necessarily the ones perhaps under consideration in the main in this thread howeverhttp://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/29/29_2_4.gif…not that I actually know what these may be…
other than my own suspicionshttp://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/29/29_2_4.gif

.

&pp=ZN
 
Two documents well worth spending time with and a careful read…for those considering a vocation and for those in religious life and leadership - and for the interested generally. And they really do need a careful and prayerful read as one part can be balanced or qualified by another part, so typical of documents of any kind coming out of Rome which tend to be lengthy and similar to any legal document (i.e. requires a lawyer to translate properly:D - which is an overstatement and tongue in cheek comment but does have some truth I think )

Congregation for Religious

catholicculture.org/docs/doc_view.cfm?recnum=4273

Description:
An Instruction, Religiosorum institutio, to the Superiors of Religious Communities, Societies without vows, and Secular Institutes on the
Careful Selection And Training of Candidates For The States Of Perfection And Sacred Orders
Purpose, Binding Force, And Extent Of This Instruction


http://www.cin.org/v2relig.html

ADAPTATION AND RENEWAL OF RELIGIOUS LIFE Perfectae Caritatis
 
“Issues” seems to be one of those words that everyone knows but no one can quite define 😉

It would seem to include:
  1. No unresolved psychological trauma
  2. no mental illnesses such as manic depression or schizophrenia(sp?) which require medication to control
  3. No problems with anger management or impulse control
Oh, and your catholicculture.org link doesn’t work :o
 
alright I think I know how to deal with this.

It is not my intent to gossip about someone but to ask for advice on what I should do. sorry if that is gossiping to you ByzCath.
You weren’t gossiping at all, Gal.

You were describing an individual in a totally anonymous fashion–you gave NO HINT as to that individual’s identity.

Your concerns are justified.

Having said this, I would agree that you are best out of it. The individual will discover in due time whether (s)he is suited for religious life.

Cloisters may be correct about the Asperger’s thing–but I don’t know how to suggest it–maybe suggest the possibility of an eremetical life without getting too technical or specific.
 
“Issues” seems to be one of those words that everyone knows but no one can quite define 😉

It would seem to include:
  1. No unresolved psychological trauma
  2. no mental illnesses such as manic depression or schizophrenia(sp?) which require medication to control
  3. No problems with anger management or impulse control
Oh, and your catholicculture.org link doesn’t work :o
Thank you re the link - it had been sitting in my files for sometime. It can be found :
papalencyclicals.net/John23/j23religios.htm
You will notice too in the opening paragraphs that a few papal documents are mentioned, it is a good move to read these also.

Incidentally I suffer Bipolar Disorder, previously known as manic depression and this name was changed to Bipolar as ‘manic depression’ gives a completely false impression of the whole range of this illness. I am under a very low dose of medication and live a completely normal life in every way - my doctor would recommend me to a religious way of living provided I take the medication which costs $3.50 per month. Mind you, there is nothing to force me to take the medication and I can not take it if I choose, I simply choose to remain on it.
Since I am as normal as any person and my doctor is of the opinion that $3.50 keeps my illness completely at bay, I cannot see the problem I would present to a community, nor indeed can my doctor since I display no symptoms whatsoever of psychological of psychiatric problems. It has been many years since I have been ill. But most all Orders here refused to even given me even a six months trial basis to see how things go.
Over and above all that, my previous posts stand.

Barb:)
 
Thank you very much for the link. I will read it starting today.

I was diagnosed with depression as a teen and was on mellaril from age 12 to age 16 and was diagnosed with ptsd about a year ago now but i have not been on that medication for almost 3 decades now.
 
Thank you very much for the link. I will read it starting today.

I was diagnosed with depression as a teen and was on mellaril from age 12 to age 16 and was diagnosed with ptsd about a year ago now but i have not been on that medication for almost 3 decades now.
Hi Trilor - I hope that The Lord will continue to send good health your way. Are you considering a religious vocation?

Barb:)
 
ypu. With a Benedictine community in the US of A 🙂
Wonderful! And may The Lord bless richly your journey. I have noticed since I had this computer that communities in the USA are (some of them) quite enlightened and educated in that they will consider people who have had problems in the past (or the most mysterious and veiled ‘issues’ of this thread - or at least I think that is what it means)…also more communities in your country will consider mature age vocations.
Australia is a vastly different story sadly.

Barb:)
 
I’m not sure why you’re so confused about what these issues are. I think the OP explained them very well in the bulleted list on the first post of the thread.
"BarbaraTherese:
This thread has me a little puzzled - What exactly are ‘issues’…which gives the impression that some people’s problems just cannot be mentioned or something like that:confused: What are ‘issues’?
40.png
BarbaraTherese:
I am still puzzled as to what exactly “issues” are
(or the most mysterious and veiled ‘issues’ of this thread - or at least I think that is what it means)
 
I’m not sure why you’re so confused about what these issues are. I think the OP explained them very well in the bulleted list on the first post of the thread.
My confusion is that not all the points bulletted are necessarily problematic (presupposing as I am that ‘issues’ and in inverted commas mean problems as per the bulletted list) to a person making application to enter religious life. Also I think that no person outside of a religious community leadership or some authority in discerning religious vocations should discourage in any way any person who is considering a religious vocation from following up on their interest. By so doing it just may be that if not called to religious life per se, then they may have a call to the eremetical life or perhaps to the Order of Virgins (consecration to a life of virginity)…or perhaps even to live as I do, under private vows to a specific way of life of radical living of The Gospel. It takes spiritual advice to discern these things - and as Bro. David points out that any person considering a religious vocation should really have a spiritual director.

If I think I have no problems then probably I have the biggest problem of all. The first step in dealing with a problem is to acknowledge that I have one. I also think that if a person asks a question then it deserves an answer - but that is my personal opinion.

Other than that read the two posts by Bro. David O.Carm and he should have better knowledge than most of us here being actually in religious life himself:
Quoting ByzCath (Bro. David O.Carm) in response to Opening Poster:
Unless this person asks for you opinion, which is all you have, then you should keep out of it as you really have no place in this at all.

If what you say is true, which we here at the forum can not know because all we have is your word on this and do you truly know this person well enough to judge them as unfit for a religious vocation.

You are not the person to judge this in them.

My suggestion would be to advise this person to get a good spiritual director as everyone who is discerning a call to religious life should have one.

Other than that there is not much you can do. Leave it to them and those vocation directors she chooses to contact.

In my book posts like this are bordering on gossip.
Originally Posted by BarbaraTherese forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cab/viewpost.gif
This thread has me a little puzzled - What exactly are ‘issues’…which gives the impression that some people’s problems just cannot be mentioned or something like that:confused: What are ‘issues’?
ByzCath (Bro.David O.Carm) replies: I have been told many times by those who work in formation and vocations that those people who have no “issues” are the ones who need to be watched closest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top