Well, I sincerely mean no offense, I am just being honest…
I don’t know the set-up of the so-called vocations committee…I just have other parishes I have experienced to judge by…so sorry if this is all a wrong interpretation…priests and religious might be very much involved…I don’t know, you’d have to tell me more…
But that being said, I would say that going to a parish that had a “vocations committee”, especially if made up of lay people would NOT encourage my vocation.
I feel called to be a priest, but because of the traditional glory of the Catholic Church.
Although I accept the new way things have gone, they do irk me a little.
A vocations comittee is bound to keep a lot of people “discerning” endlessly until they just become married people or deacons perhaps.
Mainly I’m guessing you might recruit a lot of lay people to be “volunteers” and catechists and stuff, but get no clergy or religious out of it…simply because of the idea that if one can participate in the Church through lay commitees, there is no reason to become a priest or religious.
What the Church needs to increase vocations is to bolster CLERICALISM. No one is going to become religious or clergy if the Church is in the middle of a movement towards “lay empowerment”.
The laity don’t need to be empowered, they are lay by default and need no incentive to remain as such. There will always be enough laity. The Church would still exist without the laity, at least until the clergy died off…but if there were no more priests in the world, there would be effectively no Church, even if the laity survived.
If the institute wants to perpetuate itsef, it is not the laity who need to be appeased and courted. EXCEPT, they now have the money, because we really heavily on donations now instead of the great investments and landholdings of the past…and so we do in fact go begging to the laity. And in turn, it’s because the traditional reverence and respect for the clergy has gone away that donation has slowed.
If you really want to increase vocations to religious life and the priesthood, forcefully remind people of the OBJECTIVE SUPERIORITY of their state of life comared to lay people and married deacons. Remind them that the priest is ontologically different than the laity, gets powers that no one else has, and is truly the higher calling.
Enough of this “what you do is best for you”, gentle, no-pressure, take-a-long-time-to-decide-and-leave-your-options-open nonsense. What people need for a vocation is decisiveness and commitment. A vocation is not a “feeling” that people need to “test” and “consider” and angst over for a long time. It is a CHOICE in response to God’s grace giving you a major option of life state. He may give you more than one option at certain times. Don’t feel torn. He is saying that you would be good at both, so CHOOSE one. Be firmly decisive and never turn back.
Remind everyone that the priesthood and religious life are intrinsically BETTER than lay life, not just “better for some people” or “right for those who are called” but objectively better compared to every other state of life.
But probably not worth it anyway, as its going to sound odd coming from people who themselves chose the lay path, and not that many people in the parish probably have a vocation anyway to warrant a whole comittee.