P
PaulAndrew83
Guest
Unfortunatly it is not an asuumption. It is a fact that the teaching and the discipline of the Church with regards to the conditions accompanying CITH are not followed anywhere.Neither need we automatically suspect the worst in the case of CITH.
Any parish that practices CITH does not follow the conditions set out for this practice. Fragments of the Blessed Sacrament are lost so regularly by the Peoples ignorance of the practice of purification of anything touching the Sacrament.
This leads to a lamentable set of abuses, where parishes get rid of their sacrarium, do not purify their altar linen to the destruction of faith of the Priest when he stops purifying his fingers as mandated by the rubrics. Other abuses include not cleaning carefully surfaces where the Host is dropped, no communion paten and NO CATECHISM of the faithful with regard to the fragments.
By the way there is no legitimate defence to the above statements. All those things are required by the Church in the documents that are produced.
This leads to people actually thinking that kneeling and receiving in the tongue is not the immensely superior method for the Faithful to show their Love and Reverence for the Lord. Its actually some kind of blindness on the part of anybody Hierarchy or no to actually request the change. One should not be surprised at all that such a thing was requested by the american hierarchy which proved itself incapable of cleaning out the paedo priests, when they are so blind as to request a change in the method of reception.
Perhaps the Bishops had the right to request a concession, but perhaps it would have been better for them to clean out the homosexuals and heretical teachers out of the seminarys instead.
Paul