Was crucifixion a normal punishment for blasphemy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamess12
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

Jamess12

Guest
Hello,

I’m trying to learn about the religion and a question that I have is whether the crucifixion was a normal normal punishment for blasphemy during the time Jesus was alive.

Any (name removed by moderator)ut is helpful! Thanks
 
Crucifixion was the Roman punishment for certain heinous crimes where the authorities wanted to make an example of the criminal. One of the major uses of crucifixion was for those who incited revolution, as the Gospels attest.

The punishment in the Jewish law for blasphemy was stoning, but the Jews had been denied the use of capital punishment by the Romans. So the Jewish leaders take Jesus before Pilate and charge him with opposing Roman authority.

-Fr ACEGC
 
Murder, theft, piracy, rebellion of a slave against their master, sedition against Rome to name a few, were serious crimes in the Roman Empire. But crucifixion was only applied to slaves and non-Romans. Citizens of Rome were exempt from this sort of punishment. Blasphemy against a foreign god was not on the list, that is why the Jewish authorities had to twist the accusation to imply sedition against Rome.
 
The Torah commands that a blasphemer be stoned to death, and then that his corpse be hung on a tree until late afternoon, for “God’s curse is on the one who hangs upon a tree.” The body was then buried before nightfall. In the case of Jesus, since the Sanhedrin lacked legal authority to put Jesus to death, they chose to turn Him over to the Romans to have Him hung on a tree until dead. It wasn’t ideal, but it was the most consistent thing they could do to Whom they judged a blasphemer.

Granted, the trial of Jesus makes a mockery of Jewish jurisprudence: convening at night, on the eve of a Sabbath and Festival no less, not dismissing charges when witnesses failed to agree, not allowing any witnesses for the defense (Malchus should have been called to testify how Jesus healed his ear, for one), convening in the absence of certain members of the Sanhedrin who would be sympathetic to Jesus, convicting a man based on His own testimony (which was not even corroborated), and no effort made to demonstrate that Jesus’ claim of being the Messiah actually constituted blasphemy. Yet, these hypocrites still felt the need to keep up public appearances, so they dared not enter the praetorium, lest they be ritually defiled and excluded from eating the Passover. For this reason, they sought to have Jesus crucified, so as to maintain the appearance of keeping the Law.
 
Crucifixion was the Roman punishment for certain heinous crimes where the authorities wanted to make an example of the criminal. One of the major uses of crucifixion was for those who incited revolution, as the Gospels attest.
It was a particularly vicious form of execution, only used for a handful of (to roman senses) horrific offensives.

It was also used for decimations–the literal, not modern meaning.

Decimation was a quite literal punishment for a military unit for cowardice in battle.

As the unit was marched, every mile a name was drawn, and crucified, until a tenth (deci-) of the unit had been executed! 😱

And it seems to be the source of the phrase, “excruciating pain.”

The romans had a handful of forms of execution, but crucification was saved for the most heinous (by their view) circumstances.
Citizens of Rome were exempt from this sort of punishment.
But not in the legions . . .
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top