Waving a Cloth During Recitation of the Creed in the Divine Liturgy

  • Thread starter Thread starter martinngyh
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

martinngyh

Guest
I would like to know why in the Divine Liturgy a cloth is waved by a priest when the Creed is recited over the consecrated Eucharist or over the head of a bishop when one is present.

I would appreciate any reply.
 
I would like to know why in the Divine Liturgy a cloth is waved by a priest when the Creed is recited over the consecrated Eucharist or over the head of a bishop when one is present.

I would appreciate any reply.
My wife asked that question of Father Sopoliga. He said that it is symbolic of the Holy Spirit, the breath of God. In effect God is breathing upon the accidentals and they are becoming the the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Christ; though, no one is sure exactly when during the Anaphora that actually happens. It is a mystery.
 
During the recitation of the Creed the Priest picks up the “Aer”, the veil covering the Gifts, and waves it over the Chalice and the Diskarion. This practice is a relic of the first Liturgies, some held outdoors and some in chapels with no windows. For fear that any insect might fall into the unveiled Chalice, two deacons or acolytes held large fans on either side of the Holy Altar. In place of this fanning the Priest waves the “Aer” (the veil).
However, the Church has also given a symbolism to the waving of the Aer. Just as in all contests or wars, ultimately the victor raises his flag, also in this case, the Faith has triumphed over all heresies, over all worldly bodies and now waves victoriously over all. The Aer is lowered during the 6th Article of the Creed which states that Christ ascended into Heaven.
source: St George Greek Orthodox Cathedral website

It is also said to represent either (or both) the earthquake that occured at the moment of Christ’s Resurrection, or more commonly the descent of the Holy Spirit.
 
My wife asked that question of Father Sopoliga. He said that it is symbolic of the Holy Spirit, the breath of God. In effect God is breathing upon the accidentals and they are becoming the the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Christ; though, no one is sure exactly when during the Anaphora that actually happens. It is a mystery.
A little early for that as this is happening before the beginning of the Anaphora. The Holy Spirit, at this point, is sanctifying the gifts to be worthy to become the body and blood of Christ.
 
I was told it is the veil - the priest, thought reciting the Creed, is on the outside of the veil. He is saying the words of the Creed but he cannot fully understand the mystery.

When the priest falls asleep in the Lord, he is buried with the veil from the vestments he is buried in - with the chalice side down. He has crossed over and now beholds the mystery face-to-face.
 
I would like to know why in the Divine Liturgy a cloth is waved by a priest when the Creed is recited over the consecrated Eucharist or over the head of a bishop when one is present.

I would appreciate any reply.
This ‘cloth’ is the aer or vozdukh, which covered the Gifts. Originally the waving of the aer during the Creed served a practical purpose (as most other liturgical gestures do): it was meant to keep any flyimg insects away from the Gifts as an impromptu fly-whisk. This is the same reason deacons once waved a liturgical fan (ripidion).
 
A little early for that as this is happening before the beginning of the Anaphora. The Holy Spirit, at this point, is sanctifying the gifts to be worthy to become the body and blood of Christ.
Thanks for the info. I may have not stated what Father said exactly or may have misunderstood. But, I think he was still saying that it somehow symbolized the Holy Spirit in action in some way.
 
I was told it is the veil - the priest, thought reciting the Creed, is on the outside of the veil. He is saying the words of the Creed but he cannot fully understand the mystery.

When the priest falls asleep in the Lord, he is buried with the veil from the vestments he is buried in - with the chalice side down. He has crossed over and now beholds the mystery face-to-face.
An interesting bit of history! Thanks!
 
One thing I have learned from reading one of Father Taft’s books: “In their own eyes”, is that there is much in today’s liturgy that is symbolism, but which was an actual action in the first few centuries. Things like, the entrance, the opening of the doors, the use of the fans and the cloth. It is all very interesting…
 
One thing I have learned from reading one of Father Taft’s books: “In their own eyes”, is that there is much in today’s liturgy that is symbolism, but which was an actual action in the first few centuries. Things like, the entrance, the opening of the doors, the use of the fans and the cloth. It is all very interesting…
For Eastern Christians, that’s Sunday morning! 🙂
 
One thing I have learned from reading one of Father Taft’s books: “In their own eyes”, is that there is much in today’s liturgy that is symbolism, but which was an actual action in the first few centuries. Things like, the entrance, the opening of the doors, the use of the fans and the cloth. It is all very interesting…
As I’ve said, that’s how most liturgical gestures begin: they originally have had practical purposes. Aside from this example of the waving of the /aër**vozdúkh, let’s take the (often lengthy) singing of the Cherubikon. This was originally introduced to fill the silence resulting from the commemoration of the living and the dead at the table of oblation just prior to the Great Entrance. (Given how elaborate liturgies were often said in very huge churches in those days, a procession to the sanctuary - no backdoor sacristies at that time - could take time to complete!)

For another example, this time from the Latin (Roman) Church: the washing of the hands during the Offertory. In the first Ordo Romanus we read:

The pontiff now goes down to the place where the notables sit, the chancellor holding his right hand and the chief counsellor his left: and he receives the loaves (oblationes ‘offerings’) of the princes (principum) in the order of their ‘promotion’ (?) (per ordinem archium, i.e. arche ‘beginning’). The archdeacon next receives the flasks (amulas) of wine, and pours them into the greater chalice which is carried by a district-subdeacon, and a collet follows him holding a bowl outside his planet, into which the chalice when full is emptied. A district-subdeacon takes the loaves from the pontiff and hands them to the subdeacon-attendant, who places them in a linen cloth (sindonem) held by two collets. An hebdomadary bishop receives the rest of the loaves after the pontiff, so that he may, with his own hand, put them into the linen cloth which is carried after him. Following him the deacon-attendant receives the flasks of wine, and pours them into the bowl (scyphum) with his own hand, after the archdeacon. Meanwhile the pontiff, before passing over to the women’s side, goes down before the Confession, and there receives the loaves of the chancellor, the secretary, and the chief counsellor. For on festivals they offer at the altar after the deacons. In like manner the pontiff goes up to the women’s side, and performs there all things in the same order as detailed above. And the presbyters do likewise, should there be need, either after the pontiff or in the presbytery.

After this, the pontiff returns to his throne, the chancellor and the secretary each taking him by the hand, and there washes his hands. The archdeacon stands before the altar and washes his hands at the end of the collection of the offerings. Then he looks the pontiff in the face, signs to him, and, after the pontiff has returned his salutation, approaches the altar.

In other words, the washing of hands originally had a very plain, practical purpose.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top