I sincerely hope so, else there is iminent risk that the Catholic Church may declare their union ‘null and void’.
Actually, I do not know, but the enlightened tradition of Authodoxy is that they were not. That sounds most plausible too.
Mary we know was a consecrated Virgin.
It was custom and practice for young virginsconsecrated to the temple, to come under the protectorate of an older [usually widowed] man whose reputation and holiness was beyond dispute. Such a man would also probably have a grown up family.
He would be given loco parentis responsibility to make sure nothing defiled the virgin and that she came to no harm.
Joseph fits this scenario nicely. Jesus we know had brothers since these are mentioned in the bible,though to be fair, in Aramaic cousins are also brothers. But don’t you think it is plausible that Jesus brothers could actually be His step brothers. That is the children of Joseph?
It is likely that Mary remained a consecrated virgin all of her life.
I like the idea. But, I cannot help smiling that if that was the case, poor old Joe, when he found out the child in his protection was pregnant. He must have been terrified the Temple officials would assume the child was his and that he had defiled a virgin [a very serious crime]. That would explain why the Angel told him ‘not to be afraid, as the child was fathered by Almighty God’
Can’t you imagine him saying to the angel: ‘Yeh, do you think the temple officials are going to believe that one’? It does for me bring home the humanity of the situation of the Holy Family.
Mary is God the Fathers’ daughter in law!
‘Hail Mary full of grace’.