I voted other because I have not quite “crossed the Tiber” yet. When JP2 died I decided to brush up on Catholicism so I could lead all those “idol worshipers” to the truth. So, I bought two books “Catholicism and Fundamentalism” by Keating and “The Roman Catholic Contraversy” by James White. I read the first half of Keating’s book angy (how dare Catholics use the Scriptures to prove their heretical beliefs) and I read the second half in abject horror (could the Catholic be right). In despiration I reached for White’s book and found all his arguments weak.
I had the same experience with a different set of books!
So, why haven’t I jumped ship? It is mainly because of my perception that most priests are moral and religeous relativists that introduce heresy and liturgical abuses all in the name of inclusiveness and innovation. I fear that it will tick off my wife and weaken my children’s faith. Am I wrong? Are there more priest loyal to Rome than not?
Well, if you run into priests formed in the 60’s and 70’s, when the senmiaries were “experimenting” with “new ideas” (really with heresy), you will find many who are relativists. But, many seminaries have given up trying to invent doctrine and dogma and are returning to orthodoxy. We have 3 new priests at our parish and all are as orthodox in their teaching as anyone could wish! So, come on over and let God direct you to the right priest to help you be reconciled to the Church.

I will pray for you, please pray for me!