What do you think about the fake news propaganda's

  • Thread starter Thread starter almost2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

almost2

Guest
Every discussion on trump seems biased and negative. On CNN MSNBC and NPR

The latest is the Iran deal.

What do you think?
 
They are unreliable and untrustworthy…

They apparently only poll their own audience, which is why they are so out of touch. And they tried to manipulate the voters, INCLUDING (CNN) CHEATING during the debates by giving HC the questions ahead of time.

Why are they still in business? And, why wasn’t HC disqualified for cheating?

The MSM was so unprofessional, that Chris Wallace actually said, “How could this have happened?” They don’t even know enough to hide their bias. Which they are still doing because according to them, Trump can’t do anything right.

No, they’re not trustworthy, and are definitely trying to push a leftist agenda.
 
It doesn’t matter what reporters think…

Their job is only to report the news, not try to influence and create it. Because in this past election they told us only what they wanted us to believe, which is manipulative bulloney that not all voters fell for, thanks be to God.
 
I think there is a difference between just biased coverage and ‘fake news’ coverage.

We have too much of both at present.
 
almost2 said:
What do you think?
Click to expand...
they have an agenda. anyone who doesn’t think so should look at katie couric’s editing of the gun story. she put a pause in where none was and it changed the story.

look at the staged protest or crime scenes.

look at how they portray terrorist.

could go on but nuff said
 
Trump’s tweets are a kooky embarrassment. I don’t even pay attention to the mainstream news anymore, it’s overflowing with… NBC and The Guardian are 😂

Occasionally I’ll bing world news and skim BBC, RT and WSJ. Then I pull commentary off of my favorite youtubers and here. A lot of it is interesting, but out of my control, and that’s why I don’t get too wrapped up in it.
 
Last edited:
upant said:
they have an agenda. anyone who doesn’t think so should look at katie couric’s editing of the gun story. she put a pause in where none was and it changed the story.
Click to expand...
Good example of the increased lack of integrity I’ve seen.

It’s OK for them to emphasize one side of a story over another, but not gross manipulation.

People should read their code of ethics, to level set their expectations.
SPJ Code of Ethics

 
I personally believe that many journalists are corrupt anymore.

What I do is, do my best to critically think on what I’ve read or seen on TV news. With that I’ll do my best to decide what is honest and what isn’t.
 
I think there is often an editorial bias in the media, and there has been for a very long time. I also still trust that by the time a story makes the news in the mainstream media, there are actual facts to back up that story. If not, it will be shown to be a hoax or misinformation in rapid time. I think too many people recklessly throw around the term “fake news” now whenever they find a news story disagreeable to them.
 
I don’t pay any attention to the fake news networks. I stick to the mainstream, like CNN, FOX, NBC and CBS. I leave the Breitbart and Huffington Post sites to those on the left and right that like to work up a good angry lather about stuff.
 
I don’t enjoy opinion based news casts. God has given me a brain to form my own opinions through factual reporting.
 
Actually the majority of are pleased with Trump and support him.Albiet you have to get past his delivery,however brash he may be.Actions are what matter.The media of course hate him and it shows.Only the most anti Trumpsters are buying into the negativity.
 
Last edited:
Comparing them. Anything is an improvement over blind comments, unless you have seen polls that say otherwise. Then there is the popular vote.
 
Using a site like 538 (How Popular Is Donald Trump? | FiveThirtyEight ) you can see who is conducting the polls, the method, and how well that organization correctly predicted elections.

Although 538 has a left leaning bias in their opinion they are sound when it comes to facts and the above link is simply collating polling data from a variety of poll sources.

Even organizations that have been advocates of the president are in no way showing that a majority are pleased with him.
 
An unbiased discussion of Trump is going to be, de facto, negative. A simple scan of his tweets and his public statements reveals that without any editorial interpretation at all
 
JetteZ said:
Using a site like 538 (How Popular Is Donald Trump? | FiveThirtyEight ) you can see who is conducting the polls, the method, and how well that organization correctly predicted elections.

Although 538 has a left leaning bias in their opinion they are sound when it comes to facts and the above link is simply collating polling data from a variety of poll sources.

Even organizations that have been advocates of the president are in no way showing that a majority are pleased with him.
Click to expand...
Yes, 538 is left leaning, but not misleading in what they report.
 
almost2 said:
Every discussion on trump seems biased and negative. On CNN MSNBC and NPR

The latest is the Iran deal.

What do you think?
Click to expand...
CNN, MSNBC, NPR, etc., all have a left-leaning slant. FOX News obviously leans to the right. I don’t think any of the MSM news outlets simply make things up out of thin air.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top