What does St. Paul mean in 1 Cor 15:29?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaralenio
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jaralenio

Guest
Please help, what is St. Paul talking about in this passage???
What does the church say about this passage?
29:
Otherwise, what do people mean by being baptized on behalf of the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people baptized on their behalf?
 
Hi Jaralenio,

It seems that it was a practice among early Christians to go through a baptism ceremony for those who died without being baptized. It was, I suppose, a form of prayer to God that He should save them although they were not baptized during their life. As God is free to dispense salvation as He sees fit, these ceremonies couild have had a positive result, at least for those who did not die in the state of mortal sin.

Verbum
 
The commentary in The Navarre Bible: New Testament, compact edition, (2001) on this verse says:The meaning of v. 29 is not absolutely clear. It may have refer [sic] to a custom (one that did not last long) which involved associating with one’s own Baptism friends and relatives who had already died.

The commentary in The International Bible Commentary: A Catholic and Ecumenical Commentary for the Twenty-First Century (1998) on this verse says:

In v. 29 Paul probably refers to an unknown custom among the Corinthians. Some ask for a second baptism for the benefit of a dead pagan relative or friend. Paul does not judge the custom; he only employs it in his argumentation.

The commentary in A Commentary on the New Testament (Catholic Biblical Association: 1942) says:29. Baptism for the dead, received by substitution without sacramental value for a dead catechumen who had been baptized only in desire.
 
40.png
mkw:
don’t the Mormons practice “Baptism for the Dead”?
Of course! And they use this passage + some references to 1-2nd century practices by heretics or misinformed.
St Francis DeSales uses this against those who deny Purgatory And connects it to the OT Maccabees which a Prot. or Mormon cannot do:
Sounds like:

2Maccabees: For if he were not expecting that those who had fallen would rise again, it would have been superfluous and foolish to pray for the dead.

**St Frances de Sales: **

This passage properly understood evidently shows that it was the custom of the primitive Church to watch, pray, fast, for the souls of the departed (do penance on their behalf.). For, firstly, in the Scriptures to be baptized is often taken for afflictions, punishments and penances ; as in S. Luke, chap xii., where Our Lord speaking of his Passion says: I have a baptism wherewith I am to be baptized and how am I straitened until it be accomplished!-and in S. Mark. chap x., he says : Can you drink of the chalice that I drink of; or be baptized with the baptism wherewith I am baptized? -in which places Our Lord calls pains and afflictions baptism. This then is the sense of that Scripture:** if the dead rise not again, what is the use of mortifying and afflicting oneself, of praying and fasting for the dead? **And indeed this sentence of S. Paul resembles that of Maccabees quoted above: It is superfluous and vain to pray for the dead if the dead rise not again. They may twist and transform this text with as many interpretations as they like, and there will be none to properly fit into the Holy Letter except this. I like St Francis’ interpretation the best.
AND he’s a DOCTOR of the Church
 
:rolleyes: Don’t know…but it sure as hell beats down the Mormon approach…the Mormons believe a person on earth can be baptized for someone who has died and they can go onto becoming Gods as they believe.

jaralenio said:
Please help, what is St. Paul talking about in this passage???
What does the church say about this passage?
29:
Otherwise, what do people mean by being baptized on behalf of the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people baptized on their behalf?
 
i’ve heard many speakers and pastors and priests speak on this verse, and they always emphasize that paul is using this practice as an example, not endorsing it.

it certainly isn’t catholic practice today.

yes, mormons are baptised for their dead relatives - that’s why they’re so preoccupied with geneologies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top