What if each parish could use any missal they liked in any approved translation they liked

  • Thread starter Thread starter Samuel_Mary
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not a good thing.

A little effort in getting used to some concepts that have been diluted by other translations in the past will be good for us.

“Fellowship of the Holy Spirit” doesn’t convey the depth of “communion of the Holy Spirit”, etc.

Let’s stop the dumbing down…
 
The EF existed in the Americas since around the 1500’s. It also existed since the 1500’s and 1600’s in Japan, China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, and other places throughout the world—where the native languages were not derivatives of Latin, German or any other European languages. That’s a history of 400-500 years long until Vatican 2–after which the OF was promulgated.
That was, however, the era of great cultural imperialism and colonization where Western Europeans felt they had a superior culture to the peoples they colonized. I wonder if the inhabitants of the conquered lands were asked if they’d prefer the Mass in their own language. One gets the feeling they did not have the choice.

That era thankfully is over and the Church is much more sensitive to local culture, which is a good thing.
 
Would it be a good thing if any Catholic parish, anywhere in the world were equally allowed to use any validly promulgated edition of the Roman Missal (or the equivalent for their sui iuris Church) and any approved translation of it?
No, I don’t think so. Too much turnover in staffing of individual parish churches as well as populations are really mobile as well.

changing things around at such a micro-level would be confusion for travelers as well as long term residents.
 
It is true the era of colonization and imperialism during the 1500’s, 1600’s and 1700’s was one that much destruction was done to the oppressed peoples and nations. But that did not negate the many great strides the Church made in terms of evangelization and conversion. Millions upon millions throughout the world were received into the Church. The EF was there to receive them and nurtured them for the next 400-500 years. Many declared saints and martyrs (and countless of souls in Heaven) benefitted from the EF— a Mass offered to them in a language that was not their own. Keep in mind that most of these people were likely poor peasants and formal schooling was not an option for them. But yet, they somehow managed to learn and to follow the EF.

Speaking from my own experience as I myself came from one of the nations that was victimized during the era of colonization and imperialism, my grandmother and other elders often spoke fondly and lovingly of the EF. There was no sense, or sentiments, of disliking or resenting the EF—for it not being offered in our native tongue. In fact, they often spoke of the richness and beauty of the EF. The idea of linking the EF to Western imperial agression is unfounded and false. People were not fools, and they could and did separate imperialism from the evangelization efforts of the Church. Other than the EF, the Church did respect local customs and spoke to the people in ways that they could understand and therefore practice the faith. Keep in mind that after the missionaries left or passed away in the new lands, it was the task of the newly ordained priests, bishops and nuns to carry on the torch. These people were in fact local natives themselves, and taught the faith with respect to local customs which they knew so well.

As time went by many years later, I myself had an opportunity to attend the EF for the first time in my 20’s. I have since learned that my beloved grandmother and the elders were absolutely correct about the EF. It is full of beauty and richness. My soul has truly benefited from it as it had benefited many saints and souls in Heaven.

Human will and belief often surprise us, and move us to achieve things that amaze us. It is a mistake to “dumb” down the Mass (or the Magisterium for that matter) in the hope that, by making things easier for people, it would attract more people. History, however, has taught us otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Our priest made the call of which missal to use. I approve of his choice.
 
Well, there would probably be a lot more “protestants” in the world.
 
I was thinking of the challenges it would create for visiting and supply priests. Even in the same edition, switching between publishers and their layouts/tabbing systems can throw some priests off. Ever seen a priest get derailed by a missal they aren’t used to? I once saw a mass come to a halt in the middle of the Eucharistic prayer as an altar server was sent to rummage in the sacristy for the missal a priest was used to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top