J
jdavani
Guest
Then what? I heard that singleness is not a vocation. Could your work be your vocation?
It’s perfectly fine to be single. Plenty of people just do not find anyone to marry, or the person they wanted to marry gets killed in a war or something, so they stay single.Then what? I heard that singleness is not a vocation. Could your work be your vocation?
Not sure where you heard that. St. Paul recommends it.I heard that singleness is not a vocation.
I’ve often thought that if everyone had followed St. Paul’s advice on this, Christianity might have died out long ago.Not sure where you heard that. St. Paul recommends it.
Hmmm. I heard once singleness wasn’t a vocation because you are born into it. That in order to make singleness a vocation you must become consecrated or something?Yes, there actually is a “single” vocation, but it never gets discussed.
Well, if you want to take a very loose definition of vocation then yeah. In the mind of the Church a vocation involves 3 things:Your “vocation” is whatever you feel God is calling you to do.
This may be some official “definition” of vocation, but it’s pretty tortured, and is the kind of thing that is just going to make people feel bad about being single. This is not productive thinking, I don’t care if it is coming officially from the Church.When people say "singleness isn’t a vocation they don’t invalidate the single life, it’s just a statement of fact that it isn’t a “vocation” in that sense.
Work can be sanctified and can be a vocation, but again this is not on the same level as the “vocation” the church talks about.
That’s a problem though. No point holding it up as an example.Most people who get married nowadays are not approaching it with a big attitude of “I’m going to sacrifice my life for my spouse and family”.
Because it’s not a vocation. You can’t be called to a state of life that you are in by default.and gets judged as “not a vocation”