S
sami1066
Guest
What is high mass? is it the same as Tridentine mass?
Oh and what is low massWhat is high mass? is it the same as Tridentine mass?
What is high mass? is it the same as Tridentine mass?
High Mass and Low Mass referred to the ways the Mass was celebrated in the past. The distinctions no longer exist after the 1970 reform of the Missal.Oh and what is low mass
From what I remember all those years ago, if you wanted Masses said/sung, the going rate for High was $5 and Low was $3. Not sure the difference in cost since labor was all volunteer in those days. Perhaps it was to cover the costs of extra candles and incense. I guess none of this has really mattered for over 40 years now.High Mass and Low Mass referred to the ways the Mass was celebrated in the past. The distinctions no longer exist after the 1970 reform of the Missal.
High Mass is celebrated with a choir and almost all the priest’s parts are sung/chanted, as were all the Ordinaries, i.e. the Kyrie, Gloria, Credo, Sanctus, Agnus Dei and dismissal. Six candles are lit on the altar.
The Solemn High Mass is celebrated in the same way but with a Deacon and Subdeacon. When these two clerics are present and vested, the Subdeacon sings the epistle and the Deacon the Gospel and the dismissal.
The Low Mass is celebrated by a single priest had none of his parts are sung although hymns could be allowed. Two candles are lit during Low Mass.
When the information is correct, yes. One judges on the information, not the conduit.Wikipedia is the source for Catholic answers???
Anyway where I grew up high mass was the main Sunday Mass that most people went to. i.e. not too early.
And to show my age-- there was no Saturday Mass. That was strictly for confession.![]()
Well, generally speaking, Wikipedia is not a reliable source/reference for Catholic answers. It has proved to be quite useful but it is not accurate, therefore for someone looking for trustworthy correct information related to the Church it is advisable to search reliable Catholic sources (e.g online: Vatican documents/archive, Catholic Encyclopedia …)When the information is correct, yes. One judges on the information, not the conduit.
FWIW, the Catholic Encyclopedia that we find online dates back to 1913, even before the 1917 Code of Canon Law. While it’s a good source for doctrine, it may be less so for practices from the last 100 years. A lot of non-doctrinal stuff in the Church changed after 1910, it changed greatly in the 50s and even more so in the 60s, so I wouldn’t depend on it as a source of up-to-date information.Well, generally speaking, Wikipedia is not a reliable source/reference for Catholic answers. It has proved to be quite useful but it is not accurate, therefore for someone looking for trustworthy correct information related to the Church it is advisable to search reliable Catholic sources (e.g online: Vatican documents/archive, Catholic Encyclopedia …)
I think it takes a knowledgeable person to tell which information is right and which is wrong, so it is safer for those looking for the right answers to look in the right places.
But the good thing is we are blessed here on CAF to have well informed brothers and sisters whom we can trust their citation.
Peace,
Rina
The distinctions no longer exist in the ordinary form. They do exist in the extraordinary form.High Mass and Low Mass referred to the ways the Mass was celebrated in the past. The distinctions no longer exist after the 1970 reform of the Missal.
Thank you for the valuable information, Phemie. God bless you.FWIW, the Catholic Encyclopedia that we find online dates back to 1913, even before the 1917 Code of Canon Law. While it’s a good source for doctrine, it may be less so for practices from the last 100 years. A lot of non-doctrinal stuff in the Church changed after 1910, it changed greatly in the 50s and even more so in the 60s, so I wouldn’t depend on it as a source of up-to-date information.