What is love ? What does the word mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter John_Russell_Jr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

John_Russell_Jr

Guest
In the old days there were many
different words for the different types of love. Many people get
confused by this word as it is used to describe several types of love
in english now. I’m not saying your confused about it though. It’s
perhaps the most misunderstood word in the english language now.
In the original tongue in the bible you will find the authors used
different words for the different types of love but our modern english
translation just says “love”.
I’m not being picky and don’t take me as too complicated. The way I
see it is the subjects of God and religion are so vast , deal with the
infinite and are beyond our comprehension that we might sound like
we’re complicating things when we talk like I am now. People who learn
a great deal about religious truths and pray and reflect on them
whilst struggling to lead a good life gradually become less and less
complicated. But they can be very complicated whilst they know very
little like me. Catholics often get told they complicate religion too
much for the reasons I explain and it’s not our fault- it’s God who is
so hard to understand and fathom. We stumble trying to explain the
infinite with our finite minds.
About “love” here is a good example of what I mean-
Jesus spoke Aramaic but the bible was translated into Greek. In the
5th century the catholic St Jerome translated the bible into Latin. We
all benefit from his translation because just about all early writings
are long gone but we still have St Jeromes translation and we know he
had the early texts written by the first christians and the church
sanctioned his translation.
Of love in Greek this is interesting-
We say we love our mothers and we love ice cream. The word covers such
a wide range of human affections that it is helpful to look at Greek,
which has four terms:

Storge is affectionate love, such as the need-love of a child for a parent.
Philia is the love felt for friends.
Eros is romantic or sexual love, the love that desires to possess the beloved.
Agape is self-sacrificing love, the love that desires the good of the beloved.

About the language of the New Testament this is interesting-

From www.catholc.com about biblical languages etc- A debate catholic

vs, missionary-

Finally the missionary got to Matthew 16:18: "You are Peter, and on
this rock I will build my Church."

"Hold it right there!" I said. "I know that verse. That’s where Jesus
appointed Simon the earthly head of the Church. That’s where he
appointed him the first pope." I paused and smiled broadly, knowing
what the missionary would say in response.

I knew he usually didn’t get any defense of the Catholic position at
all as he went door to door, but sometimes a Catholic would speak up
as I had. He had a reply, and I knew what it would be, and I was ready
for it.

"I understand your thinking," he said, "but you Catholics
misunderstand this verse because you don’t know any Greek. That’s the
trouble with your Church and with your scholars. You people don’t know
the language in which the New Testament was written. To understand
Matthew 16:18, we have to get behind the English to the Greek."

"Is that so?" I said, leading him on. I pretended to be ignorant of
the trap being laid for me.

"Yes," he said. "In Greek, the word for rock is petra, which means a
large, massive stone. The word used for Simon’s new name is different;
it’s Petros, which means a little stone, a pebble."

In reality, what the missionary was telling me at this point was
false. As Greek scholars—even non-Catholic ones—admit, the words
petros and petra were synonyms in first century Greek. They meant
"small stone" and “large rock” in some ancient Greek poetry, centuries
before the time of Christ, but that distinction had disappeared from
the language by the time Matthew’s Gospel was rendered in Greek. The
difference in meaning can only be found in Attic Greek, but the New
Testament was written in Koine Greek—an entirely different dialect. In
Koine Greek, both petros and petra simply meant “rock.” If Jesus had
wanted to call Simon a small stone, the Greek lithos would have been
used. The missionary’s argument didn’t work and showed a faulty
knowledge of Greek. (For an Evangelical Protestant Greek scholar’s
admission of this, see D. A. Carson, The Expositor’s Bible Commentary
[Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1984], Frank E. Gaebelein, ed., 8:368).

"You Catholics," the missionary continued, "because you don’t know
Greek, imagine that Jesus was equating Simon and the rock. Actually,
of course, it was just the opposite. He was contrasting them. On the
one side, the rock on which the Church would be built, Jesus himself;
on the other, this mere pebble. Jesus was really saying that he
himself would be the foundation, and he was emphasizing that Simon
wasn’t remotely qualified to be it."

"Case closed," he thought.
 
continued-

It was the missionary’s turn to pause and smile broadly. He had
followed the training he had been given. He had been told that a rare
Catholic might have heard of Matthew 16:18 and might argue that it
proved the establishment of the papacy. He knew what he was supposed
to say to prove otherwise, and he had said it.

"Well," I replied, beginning to use that nugget of information I had
come across, "I agree with you that we must get behind the English to
the Greek." He smiled some more and nodded. "But I’m sure you’ll agree
with me that we must get behind the Greek to the Aramaic."

"The what?" he asked.

"The Aramaic," I said. "As you know, Aramaic was the language Jesus
and the apostles and all the Jews in Palestine spoke. It was the
common language of the place."

"I thought Greek was."

"No," I answered. "Many, if not most of them, knew Greek, of course,
because Greek was the lingua franca of the Mediterranean world. It was
the language of culture and commerce; and most of the books of the New
Testament were written in it, because they were written not just for
Christians in Palestine but also for Christians in places such as
Rome, Alexandria, and Antioch, places where Aramaic wasn’t the spoken
language.

"I say most of the New Testament was written in Greek, but not all.
Many hold that Matthew was written in Aramaic—we know this from
records kept by Eusebius of Caesarea—but it was translated into Greek
early on, perhaps by Matthew himself. In any case the Aramaic original
is lost (as are all the originals of the New Testament books), so all
we have today is the Greek."

I stopped for a moment and looked at the missionary. He seemed a bit
uncomfortable, perhaps doubting that I was a Catholic because I seemed
to know what I was talking about. I continued.

Aramaic in the New Testament

"We know that Jesus spoke Aramaic because some of his words are
preserved for us in the Gospels. Look at Matthew 27:46, where he says
from the cross, ‘Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?’ That isn’t Greek; it’s
Aramaic, and it means, 'My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?'

"What’s more," I said, "in Paul’s epistles—four times in Galatians and
four times in 1 Corinthians—we have the Aramaic form of Simon’s new
name preserved for us. In our English Bibles it comes out as Cephas.
That isn’t Greek. That’s a transliteration of the Aramaic word Kepha
(rendered as Kephas in its Hellenistic form).

"And what does Kepha mean? It means a rock, the same as petra. (It
doesn’t mean a little stone or a pebble. What Jesus said to Simon in
Matthew 16:18 was this: 'You are Kepha, and on this kepha I will build
my Church.'

"When you understand what the Aramaic says, you see that Jesus was
equating Simon and the rock; he wasn’t contrasting them. We see this
vividly in some modern English translations, which render the verse
this way: 'You are Rock, and upon this rock I will build my church.'
In French one word, pierre, has always been used both for Simon’s new
name and for the rock."

For a few moments the missionary seemed stumped. It was obvious he had
never heard such a rejoinder. His brow was knit in thought as he tried
to come up with a counter. Then it occurred to him.

"Wait a second," he said. "If kepha means the same as petra, why don’t
we read in the Greek, 'You are Petra, and on this petra I will build
my Church’? Why, for Simon’s new name, does Matthew use a Greek word,
Petros, which means something quite different from petra?"

"Because he had no choice," I said. "Greek and Aramaic have different
grammatical structures. In Aramaic you can use kepha in both places in
Matthew 16:18. In Greek you encounter a problem arising from the fact
that nouns take differing gender endings.

"You have masculine, feminine, and neuter nouns. The Greek word petra
is feminine. You can use it in the second half of Matthew 16:18
without any trouble. But you can’t use it as Simon’s new name, because
you can’t give a man a feminine name—at least back then you couldn’t.
You have to change the ending of the noun to make it masculine. When
you do that, you get Petros, which was an already-existing word
meaning rock.

"I admit that’s an imperfect rendering of the Aramaic; you lose part
of the play on words. In English, where we have ‘Peter’ and 'rock,'
you lose all of it. But that’s the best you can do in Greek."
 
last bit-

Beyond the grammatical evidence, the structure of the narrative does
not allow for a downplaying of Peter’s role in the Church. Look at the
way Matthew 16:15-19 is structured. After Peter gives a confession
about the identity of Jesus, the Lord does the same in return for
Peter. Jesus does not say, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jona! For flesh
and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in
heaven. And I tell you, you are an insignificant pebble and on this
rock I will build my Church. . . . I will give you the keys of the
kingdom of heaven." Jesus is giving Peter a three-fold blessing,
including the gift of the keys to the kingdom, not undermining his
authority. To say that Jesus is downplaying Peter flies in the face of
the context. Jesus is installing Peter as a form of chief steward or
prime minister under the King of Kings by giving him the keys to the
kingdom. As can be seen in Isaiah 22:22, kings in the Old Testament
appointed a chief steward to serve under them in a position of great
authority to rule over the inhabitants of the kingdom. Jesus quotes
almost verbatum from this passage in Isaiah, and so it is clear what
he has in mind. He is raising Peter up as a father figure to the
household of faith (Is. 22:21), to lead them and guide the flock (John
21:15-17). This authority of the prime minister under the king was
passed on from one man to another down through the ages by the giving
of the keys, which were worn on the shoulder as a sign of authority.
Likewise, the authority of Peter has been passed down for 2000 years
by means of the papacy.

St John Gospen Ch:21
11 Simon Peter went up, and drew the net to land, full of great
fishes, one hundred and fifty-three. And although there were so many,
the net was not broken. 12 Jesus saith to them: Come, and dine. And
none of them who were at meat, durst ask him: Who art thou? knowing
that it was the Lord. 13 And Jesus cometh and taketh bread, and giveth
them, and fish in like manner. 14 This is now the third time that
Jesus was manifested to his disciples, after he was risen from the
dead. 15 When therefore they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter:
Simon son of John, lovest thou me more than these? He saith to him:
Yea, Lord, thou knowest that I love thee. He saith to him: Feed my
lambs.

16 He saith to him again: Simon, son of John, lovest thou me? He saith
to him: Yea, Lord, thou knowest that I love thee. He saith to him:
Feed my lambs. 17 He said to him the third time: Simon, son of John,
lovest thou me? Peter was grieved, because he had said to him the
third time: Lovest thou me? And he said to him: Lord, thou knowest all
things: thou knowest that I love thee. He said to him: Feed my sheep.
18 Amen, amen I say to thee, when thou wast younger, thou didst gird
thyself, and didst walk where thou wouldst. But when thou shalt be
old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee,
and lead thee whither thou wouldst not. 19 And this he said,
signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had said
this, he saith to him: Follow me. 20 Peter turning about, saw that
disciple whom Jesus loved following, who also leaned on his breast at
supper, and said: Lord, who is he that shall betray thee?

Commentary 17 “Feed my sheep”… Our Lord had promised the spiritual
supremacy to St. Peter; St. Matt. 16. 19; and here he fulfils that
promise, by charging him with the superintendency of all his sheep,
without exception; and consequently of his whole flock, that is, of
his own church.


From me- It’s also interesting that in the original tongue Jesus asks
Peter does he love him as a brotherly love the first 2 times. The 3rd
time He asks Peter if he loves him with the love due to God alone.

This disturbs Peter and causes him to cry for a few reasons. Peter has
been made the leader of the apostles and church when he got the keys.
He denied Jesus 3 times in His passion and must make 3 acts of love to
atone. He has been stripped of his rank. With the 3rd request from
Jesus asking Peter do you love me with the love due to God alone Peter
realises he is atoning for his 3 sins and he’s been stripped of his
rank as leader of the apostles and church and the message is
reinforced that he denied his God and saviour and not just a man.
Jesus in this process is reinstating Peter as the head of the apostles
and church- the bishop of Rome or Pope 9 Peters 3rd act of love to Jesus sees him reinstate as head of the apostles and church ).
Another tidbit is the catching of 153 fish. Christians were known as
fish early on and there were 153 cities known at that time by the
apostles. It’s symbolic of their mission.


From me-
Jn 13:34
** A new commandment I give unto you: That you love one another,**
as I have loved you, that you also love one another. 35 By this shall
all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love one for
another.
 
It is well documented that St John the Apostle lived until late 1st
century and the christians who were named catholic about 100AD used to
always ask his advice on what’s the ost important thing to do and he
would say, " little children, love one another."


From Christ is passing by. St Josemaria Escriva. Founder of Opus Dei.

115 I don’t want to finish without another consideration. When a
Christian makes Christ present among men by being Christ himself, it
is not only a matter of being a considerate, loving person, but of
making the Love of God known through his human love. Jesus saw all his
life as a revelation of this love. As he said to one of his disciples,
"He who has seen me has seen the Father."

St John applies this teaching when he tells Christians that, since
they have come to know the love of God, they should show it in their
deeds: "Beloved, let us love one another since love comes from God,
and everyone who loves is begotten by God and knows God.

"He who does not love does not know God; for God is love. In this the
love of God was made manifest among us, that God sent his only Son
into the world, so that we might live through him. In this is love,
not that we love God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the
expiation for our sins. Beloved, if God so loved us, we also ought to

**love one another." **
 
Thank you. This is beautiful. 🙂 I have never so clearly seen the authority of Peter explained by the Scripture presented before. I hope to copy and save it in case I ever need to explain the Scriptural authority of the Bishop of Rome, the Pope, to others. As an addendum, it is very interesting that it is particularly in the letters of Peter, particularly 1 Peter 5, that we see the commands to submit to the presybters and clothe onself with humility. So if Peter is the authority and he uses this authority in his letters to command us to submit to the presybters, we know this command is as if Christ personally gave it to us. 🙂 👍 🙂

The only question that I ask is: * maybe you might help me locate the source of these passages? *
 
1 Peter 5

So I exhort the presbyters among you, as a fellow presbyter and witness to the sufferings of Christ and one who has a share in the glory to be revealed.
Tend the flock of God in your midst, (overseeing) not by constraint but willingly, as God would have it, not for shameful profit but eagerly.
Do not lord it over those assigned to you, but be examples to the flock.

And when the chief Shepherd is revealed, you will receive the unfading crown of glory.

Likewise, you younger members, be subject to the presbyters. And all of you, clothe yourselves with humility in your dealings with one another, for: “God opposes the proud but bestows favor on the humble.”
So humble yourselves under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you in due time.
Cast all your worries upon him because he cares for you.
Be sober and vigilant. Your opponent the devil is prowling around like a roaring lion looking for (someone) to devour.
Resist him, steadfast in faith, knowing that your fellow believers throughout the world undergo the same sufferings.

The God of all grace who called you to his eternal glory through Christ (Jesus) will himself restore, confirm, strengthen, and establish you after you have suffered a little.
To him be dominion forever. Amen.
I write you this briefly through Silvanus, whom I consider a faithful brother, exhorting you and testifying that this is the true grace of God. Remain firm in it.
The chosen one at Babylon sends you greeting, as does Mark, my son.
Greet one another with a loving kiss. Peace to all of you who are in Christ.
 
To me, ‘love’ means living in communion with others the way Jesus did. He lived entirely to serve God by serving Man, and then paid the ultimate price for setting such a revolutionary example therein. As Mother Teresa said, “We must love until it hurts.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top