What is New Age?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Irish_Eyes_826
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I

Irish_Eyes_826

Guest
I read all the time on CAF about the evils of new age. However, I don’t even know what the heck New Age is. I’ve heard that it’s everything from Taize prayer to Harry Potter to yoga. All of which I enjoy very much and all of which seem very harmless to me. So, am I missing something, or is all the fuss about “New Age” just a bunch of silliness about new ideas?
 
Sometimes I think that “New Age” is a synonym for “things I don’t like/agree with”.
I have a particular interest in this topic because a lot of people confuse New Age with Paganism (while the two traditions have some overlap, the two movements have different origins, literature, Paganism is generally polytheistic while New Agers are generally monistic or monotheistic).

I took a few courses of study in (secular) university where we discussed the New Age in depth. I personally divide the movement into “Eastern” and “Western” camps.

In my opinion, these are some beliefs and practices that are thought of as “New Age”:

Eastern: some forms of yoga, chakra meditations (especially those that only use seven chakras, one lady who gave a talk revealed an unknown “eighth chakra” called the “Star-Soul chakra” which, as far as I know, isn’t in any Hindu texts), “tantric” sex (especially when it’s all about the sex), the (over) use of the term “Namaste”

Western: crystals, channeling, psychics, spirit guides, Ascended Masters, “angel therapy”, flower essences, orgone energy, Atlantis and Lemuria, almost anything that’s marketed as “genuine Native American X” by non-Natives or fake Natives, Sedona, Arizona is a hotbed for this sort of activity

These are some of the terms I’ve noticed that crop up in the literature (I went through a New Age phase at one point): vibrations (including things like “vibrational medicine”), the concept that some souls are “more evolved” than others, ego-centric phrasing (ie. the ego is holding you back from reaching your full potential), indigo, crystal, and rainbow children. Ironically, much of the literature is very anti-materialist when New Age kitsch tends to cost a lot of money. There’s actually a joke about that:

“What’s the difference between a Wiccan and a New Ager?”
A decimal point. (Wiccans don’t usually charge for their services, or usually offer them for a cheaper price than a New Age guru would).

Also note that non-New Agers might also engage in some of these practices (yoga was originally an “import” from Hinduism, and lots of Pagans like crystals). I would say that the difference is in the language used and the context of the belief/practice.
 
It’s hard to define New Age because it’s not a single organization or a single faith or school of thought. Also I’ve never been involved with it, so I’m not the best person to describe it. My impression is it’s basically a term for a whole range syncretic modern spiritual beliefs and practices, often of an esoteric nature (think “secret knowledge”), drawing on very diverse backgrounds like Gnosticism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Native American religions, Taoism, Voodoo, Neopaganism, Kabbalah, astrology, psychology, and much more. Even some Christian influences. The closest thing to a common, central theme that I can make out is the idea that fulfillment and spiritual power is to be found within us, as a part of us we need to become conscious of, rather than seeking it outside.

No doubt the term “New Age” is wrongly applied to some things people don’t like, but from what I’ve heard New Age currents really have entered the mainstream through certain sources like Oprah, self-help books, and corporate employee development programs. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable can shed more light on this subject than I can.

Edit: Here’s the Wikipedia article about it, FWIW. Seems to confirm my basic impression about it.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Age
 
Levitcus 19: 31

"Do not go to mediums or consult fortune-tellers, for you will be defiled by them. I, the LORD, am your God.
 
New Age is a spiritual movement that is laden with things are that are sinful. It is a spiritual movement that has its roots in Eastern religions.
 
New Age is everything from mediums, channelling spirits, to the “Secret”… .here’s a good video: youtube.com/watch?v=qqJaRr9O2ag&feature=related

by the way, I would say that yoga can be new age. Fr John Hardon said that the positions in yoga are so tied with their spiritual meanings (that COULD BE associated with worshipping pagan gods) - that it’s best for Christians to avoid it. There are other alternatives out there like pilates.

God bless
 
I think that it is PERFECLY fine to do yoga, so long as its purely a physical endeavour.

Yoga has really helped my breathing (I’ve suffered in the past from really terribly blocked up sinuses) so I can personally vouch for its benefits. However I am not a Hindu, but a Catholic so I obviously do not have anything to do with the religious aspects of it.

However we should never seek to remove or destroy ANYTHING that is good in other religions and/or cultures:

"The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions. She regards with sincere reverence those ways of conduct and of life, those precepts and teachings which, though differing in many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless often reflect a ray of that Truth which enlightens all men" *(Nostra Aetate) *

Yoga, as a purely physical exercise, is most definetly one of the best things to have come out of Hindu culture/religion and so Catholics should, to my mind, embrace it wholeheartedly firstly because its good for our health and secondly out of love for our Christian brothers with an Indian heritage. We cannot be Euro-centric, we are after all the “Universal Church” and our Western civilisation stems in part from Ancient Rome and Greece, which were Pagan cultures who worshipped many Gods. We rejected the idolatry of these cultures but we most definetly embraced and incorporated EVERYTHING that was good in them into our own faith, which was originally Judaic.

Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI) once wrote:

“Just as ‘the Catholic Church rejects nothing of what is true and holy in [the great religions]‘ neither should these ways be rejected out of hand simply because they are not Christian. On the contrary, one can take from them what is useful so long as the Christian conception of prayer, its logic and requirements are never obscured.”

We must seek to do the same with India and other nations.

Pope John Paul II nce said that Catholics should seek to find and learn about some of the holy concepts from Indian religions which are compatible with our own:

"A great spiritual impulse leads Indian thought to seek an experience which would liberate the spirit from the shackles of time and space and therefore would acquire great value…In India particularly; it is the duty of Christians now to draw from this rich heritage the elements compatible with their faith, in order to enrich Christian Thought"

Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI are both holy and intelligent men - the former is now a Blessed and the latter is beyond doubt the greatest mind in Christian theology for a long time! 👍
 
To the OP: Thank you for starting this thread. It has been informative for me. 👍

To those discussing yoga … once when I was flat on my back and could hardly move for a week, I started watching a yoga program on TV. There was no religious content. She demonstrated a few moves and stretches which helped my back. :yup:

If someone doesn’t want to do yoga, I have no problem with that. But I have to scratch my head at all the things we would have to do without because of what seems to be a culture of fear that in some way it is connected to “new age” or other non-Catholic source. In light of what JP2 and B16 said, I think one who hears their words and then coaches others to stay away from it are doing others a disservice. :mad:

Our popes are doing what they can to build interreligious harmony, and to build relations, but some of us insist on rejecting and pushing away the same people the popes are trying to reach out to. Indeed. We can’t even sit in the same way that others do, because they might be similar to positions other people have adopted while practicing their religion? To me that seems paranoid if not downright superstitious. :eek:

I agree that I’ve seen “new age” applied to mean “things I disagree with.” I appreciate seeing it broken down a little more specifically. 🙂

Alan
 
I think that it is PERFECLY fine to do yoga, so long as its purely a physical endeavour.
I agree with this. If you have any objections to it, there’s no need to incorporate the religious aspects of it, then yoga just becomes…well…“stretching”. 🙂

Besides, I guarantee you do at least one yoga posture every night! It’s called the “corpse pose”:

yogajournal.com/media/originals/savasana_248.jpg

(Hint: We call it “lying down”)

🙂

Once again, stretching is good for you! Yoga (technically “hatha yoga”) is just organized stretching!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top