Aside from the fact that there are souls living there who are created in the image and likeness of Almighty God, souls who need to hear the Gospel and be led to salvation in God’s one true Church, what is so special about the Amazon region that makes it worthy of a synod — when other parts of the world are not?
Is it a question of Catholics living there who supposedly can’t be ministered to properly? How many? Or adherents of nature-based religions who need to have the Faith taught in a way they can understand and embrace? We’ve been doing inculturation, in one form or another, from day one. How are these people different from people in other parts of the world who are in similar circumstances?
And how, exactly, would it be desirable for them to have married priests, as opposed to other areas? Celibacy and perfect continence aren’t understood or appreciated in affluent Western culture either, and there is no synod to address this. We do not have an abundance of vocations (aside from traditionalist communities). We import priests from parts of the world where vocations are abundant. Why can’t they do the same in the Amazon?
And if life is so rugged in the Amazon, wouldn’t it be harder to maintain priests who are married, possibly with families of their own? Better to have celibate priests who only have to endure a harsh lifestyle on their own, without worrying about the welfare of their loved ones?
I’m sure these questions have been posed and addressed elsewhere (on CAF and outside it), but these are just things I’ve been scratching my head over lately. Forgive my ignorance.
Is it a question of Catholics living there who supposedly can’t be ministered to properly? How many? Or adherents of nature-based religions who need to have the Faith taught in a way they can understand and embrace? We’ve been doing inculturation, in one form or another, from day one. How are these people different from people in other parts of the world who are in similar circumstances?
And how, exactly, would it be desirable for them to have married priests, as opposed to other areas? Celibacy and perfect continence aren’t understood or appreciated in affluent Western culture either, and there is no synod to address this. We do not have an abundance of vocations (aside from traditionalist communities). We import priests from parts of the world where vocations are abundant. Why can’t they do the same in the Amazon?
And if life is so rugged in the Amazon, wouldn’t it be harder to maintain priests who are married, possibly with families of their own? Better to have celibate priests who only have to endure a harsh lifestyle on their own, without worrying about the welfare of their loved ones?
I’m sure these questions have been posed and addressed elsewhere (on CAF and outside it), but these are just things I’ve been scratching my head over lately. Forgive my ignorance.