What is Thomism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter awfulthings9
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

awfulthings9

Guest
I know that Thomism means to follow the teachings of St. Thomas or the Dominican Order, but I mean, specifically, can anyone sum up in A FEW sentences what Thomism means? I’m preparing to read Kreeft’s Summa of the Summa and thought this might help me internalize. I’ve been in situations where someone will make a statement and someone else will reply with “You Thomist, you”, or something to that effect. In a nutshell, what identifies one’s philosophy as “Thomist”?
 
Sorry, I didn’t realize I was in “Moral Theology” at the time I started this thread. If a moderator wants to move it, please feel free. Otherwise, I hope someone in here can respond anyway. Take care.
 
Here’s an excerpt from Wikipedia:

Aquinas’s philosophy
[edit]

Generally

Aquinas worked to create a philosophical system which integrated Christian doctrine with elements taken from the philosophy of Aristotle. Generally, he augmented the Neo-Platonic view of philosophy which, after Augustine, had become tremendously influential amongst medieval philosophers, with insights drawn from Aristotle. In this he was greatly influenced by his reading of contemporary Arabic philosophers, especially Averroes. Aquinas, is, therefore, generally agreed to have moved the focus of Scholastic philosophy from Plato to Aristotle. The extent to which he was successful in doing this is, of course, still hotly debated.
[edit]

Distinctive ideas
Code:
* Philosophical realism: Aquinas believed that humans were composed of two parts: "prime matter" and "substantial form." The prime matter of humans is our body, and the substantial form is our soul. The soul is therefore not made of matter. Our souls are unique; there can be no two angels or humans that bear the same substantial form, or soul.
* Moral objectivism: The nature of the universe and essences of objects do not depend on the free will of God, but on His intellect, and ultimately on His essence, which is unchanging. The natural law, springing from the mind of God, is therefore immutable. Consequently, immoral acts are immoral not simply because God forbids them, but because they are inherently immoral. (Zigliara, "Sum. phil." (3 vols., Paris, 1889), ccx, xi, II, M. 23, 24, 25)
* Teleology: the universe is guided by principles, purpose, and design beyond the universe itself; specifically, the principles and design of God.
* Free will: Decisions are made by the interaction of the will and the intellect; the will presents objects to the intellect, and the intellect directs the will. Acts begin with the apprehension of the good in general by the intellect. We desire happiness naturally and necessarily, and not by free will; however, we choose particular goods freely. The will is a blind faculty, always following the past determination of the intellect. (Zigliara, 51).
* Senses: The senses are passive, in that they perceive, rather than creating, their objects. However, the will controls the exercise of the faculties, and thus determines and shapes what they perceive and how they perceive it.
* Empiricism: Held to the Peripatetic axiom: "Nothing is in the intellect that was not first in the senses," modified by saying that the intellect can ascend to the knowledge of higher things from the basis of perception, even God, and that the soul knows of its existence by its action.
* First principles: the basis for human knowledge is latent in the soul, not in the form of objective knowledge, but in the form of subjective inclination to believe them due to the evidentiary support: As soon as they are proposed they are known to be true. (Zigliara, op. cit., pp. 32-42).
* Universals: Universals are the primary object of the intellect, and are formed by abstraction from sense perception. The process of abstraction is so elevated above material conditions as to prove that man is spiritual.
* Immortality: The human soul is immortal by its very nature, because it has no principle of disintegration (Zigliara, p. 9).
* Arguments for the existence of God are made a posteriori, rather than a priori. In other words, the existence of God can be proven through perceptions and reason, but cannot be known by any innate knowledge. Thus the ontological argument is rejected, but several other arguments are made for the existence of God; these are considered in the next section.
Most Catholics who engage in true philosophy are probably Thomists
 
This thread might actually be served best by being here, as a lot of the Thomistic labels being placed lately seem to be realted to Moral Theology

The actual defintion of Thomistic Philosophy or Theology are bit complex, (see here newadvent.org/cathen/14698b.htm#II)

So I really doubt those who call you “Thomistic” are going into such specific terms.

In modern parlance, a person is “Thomistic” when they hold to absolute modes of evil, that an action can be evil in and of itself and the performance of that act can never be justifed by the resultant good.

Of course that is 100% Catholic teaching, but it flows counter to Catholic revisionist morality as articulated by Frs. Curran and McBrien.

It can also be used to describe certain beliefs on the nature of Faith vs. Reason, such as if the existance of God can be deduced Rationally, (Thomistic) vs. Faith preceding Reason (Augustine)
 
Despite what some may say, Thomism is not the worship of St. Thomas.

It refers to the method of philosophy and theology that he developed.
 
Thanks all, especially Brendan, who gave exactly the type of answer I needed. The encyclopedic answer then helped to develop this for me. God bless (but don’t stop posting if you have more to say).
 
More readily said Thomism is the theology of the Church per the encyclical Aeteri Patris.
 
Perhaps the Thomism Blues might help:

Now, when I was conceived,
Though my momma didn’t know,
My body was infused
With a rational soul.
Now I’m a man
With one final end:
Eternal beatitude
With God as a true friend.

Chorus
I’m a man
Spell it M
A
N
Man
Ah
Ah
Ah
Ah

Y’all listen to me,
'Cause you know I ain’t teasing.
I’m an individual substance
Of a nature with reason.

Repeat Chorus

Ain’t just made of matter.
Ain’t spirit trapped in mud.
I ain’t just my soul,
I’m my soul plus my flesh and blood.

Repeat Chorus

I stand at the top
Of the material order,
But I also cross
The spiritual border.

Repeat Chorus
 
These authors can help you discover “Thomism.” The key is that objective truth is grounded in reality (oversimplified?) and exists independently of OUR thoughts or perceptions.

These authors can help: Ralph McInerny, Etienne Gilson and Jacques Maritain are modern Thomists. Peter Kreeft probably is too, though I don’t feel qualified to say, and he certainly writes clearly and often about the subject. I’m sure there are others…

One of my life goals is to understand Thomism and philosophy well enough to read “The Degrees of Knowledge” by Maritain. It’s about unifying fath and reason, nature and the supernatural.
 
40.png
JamesD:
Perhaps the Thomism Blues might help:

Now, when I was conceived,
Though my momma didn’t know,
My body was infused
With a rational soul.
Now I’m a man
With one final end:
Eternal beatitude
With God as a true friend.

Chorus
I’m a man
Spell it M
A
N
Man
Ah
Ah
Ah
Ah

Y’all listen to me,
'Cause you know I ain’t teasing.
I’m an individual substance
Of a nature with reason.

Repeat Chorus

Ain’t just made of matter.
Ain’t spirit trapped in mud.
I ain’t just my soul,
I’m my soul plus my flesh and blood.

Repeat Chorus

I stand at the top
Of the material order,
But I also cross
The spiritual border.

Repeat Chorus
This is great - where di you find it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top