What sins could not possibly be mortal (under any circumstances)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DavidFilmer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Mortal Sin has 3 requirements. Not one. Without the other two, no one act, no matter what it is, without the other two, meets the requirements.
  1. Grave matter
  2. Full knowledge
  3. Complete consent
ONLY God can know if 2 and 3 are met. No human can determine what is another’s mind.
 
Mortal Sin has 3 requirements. Not one. Without the other two, no one act, no matter what it is, without the other two, meets the requirements.
  1. Grave matter
  2. Full knowledge
  3. Complete consent
ONLY God can know if 2 and 3 are met. No human can determine what is another’s mind.
according to the catholic church can an individual know whether a sin he has committed has been done with full knowledge and complete consent without any doubt whatsoever?
 
Mortal Sin has 3 requirements. Not one. Without the other two, no one act, no matter what it is, without the other two, meets the requirements.
  1. Grave matter
  2. Full knowledge
  3. Complete consent
ONLY God can know if 2 and 3 are met. No human can determine what is another’s mind.
But for the purpose of the conversation, we can hypothesize a sin that we know the qualities of 2 and 3 for. For instance:

Uttering an expletive or taking the lord’s name in vain in reaction to something unpleasant and surprising. Such as tipping your canoe over in a cold pond. In that instance, what you utter is just a sheer reaction to something unpleasant, and it does not fulfill 2 or 3.
 
You haven’t addressed the thread authors question. He asks whether any sin can be considered inherently venial due to the catholic church creating a distinction between sins which are “grave matter” and those that aren’t. “diminished capacity” is not a sin but a state of a person whereby they are not accurately able to assess whether they are committing sins or not.
The Catholic Church did not create the distinction between mortal and venial sin. God did and we can see this reflected in scripture.

1 John 5:17 talks about sin that is not deadly. There are more but you are gravely wrong in stating that the Catholic Church created a distinction between sins. The Catholic church created the word Trinity but few believe we created the concept.
 
I think any sin could be mortal if it was grave matter, full knowledge, and complete consent. It isn’t what it is, it’s the criteria/intent.
 
If we can never know for certain any of the three criterion for a mortal sin a person can never possibly know if they have committed a mortal sin because you state only God is capable of knowing this.
Yes. This is the Doctrine of the Catholic Church. Nobody can know for sure if he is in a state of Grace (ie, has not committed an unconfessed mortal sin). Thus, it stands to reason that we can never know for sure if any sin we commit is mortal in nature (if we could know that, we could know for sure that we are not in a state of Grace - which we cannot ever know).
If no human can know the gravity of an act, whether they have full knowledge or free will in the act the obvious conclusion is that every sin that a person commits is venial because as you state a human cannot observe whether he is doing the act wilfully or not therefore he cannot ever be said to have full knowledge as only God can judge(according to your own statement) whether an act has full consent.
I think I see where you are trying to go. Part of the “knowledge” aspect requires an understanding of the grave nature of the act. And if we can never know for sure the gravity of the act, we can never have full and complete knowledge, and thus cannot ever commit mortal sin.

And that’s a good point. I may need to reconsider my opinion that we cannot know the gravity of the act. As far as I am aware, I am the only Catholic to ever form such an opinion (I seriously doubt that I am, but it is not something I have never seen before).
 
Yes. This is the Doctrine of the Catholic Church. Nobody can know for sure if he is in a state of Grace (ie, has not committed an unconfessed mortal sin). Thus, it stands to reason that we can never know for sure if any sin we commit is mortal in nature (if we could know that, we could know for sure that we are not in a state of Grace - which we cannot ever know).

I think I see where you are trying to go. Part of the “knowledge” aspect requires an understanding of the grave nature of the act. And if we can never know for sure the gravity of the act, we can never have full and complete knowledge, and thus cannot ever commit mortal sin.

And that’s a good point. I may need to reconsider my opinion that we cannot know the gravity of the act. As far as I am aware, I am the only Catholic to ever form such an opinion (I seriously doubt that I am, but it is not something I have never seen before).
Of course we can know the gravity of an act. In some instances - eg abortion - we know it because the church has said explicitly that it is grave matter in any circumstances.

In other instances - such as lying - the church has said that the gravity of a lie depends on various factors, such as the nature of the truth we are deforming, the harm we do to others by our lie and so on.

In such circumstances we can still know the gravity of our sins. We can use the guidance the Church offers plus our informed conscience to make a determination that in the particular circumstances in which we lied, our lie was grave matter (eg perjuring oneself in court, on oath, would rarely if ever not be grave matter, and I think a person can use reason and informed conscience to decide which). Or that in the particular circumstances (eg telling your wife ‘no, those jeans do not make your bum look look big’ when they do) it was not grave matter.

Think of the relationship analogy. There are some misdeeds that would be a ‘deal breaker’ for pretty much any couple - infidelity, for example. It’s very easy to objectively say ‘no, you shouldn’t cheat on your spouse’.

There are others that are a ‘deal breaker’ only for some people. Every couple will have different standards as far as household chores, for example. So every couple will know that they should at least not have so much rubbish about the house that vermin is attracted or health and safety compromised, but beyond that there is no ‘one size fits all’ for each couple.

Within that couple, there will often be one partner to whom it matters more than to the other. Or times at which it matters more - eg they may be more tolerant of mess if they have a newborn baby or something.

Nonetheless, a spouse CAN oftentimes make a good guess as to what their partner’s expectations are in regard to household chores, without being explicitly told. Or decide to clean house regardless of what their partner thinks because they personally are uncomfortable with the level of mess and it is a big issue for them.

That’s how it works in our relationship with God as well. Sin is a rupture in the relationship, mortal sin is a serious one. A relationship can be ruptured equally from our side (ie by us doing things that we are not comfortable with, that we are fairly sure are grave matter) as from God’s (ie doing things that indisputably and whichever way you slice it are grave matter).
 
The Catholic church created the word Trinity but few believe we created the concept.
Unfortunately, that is incorrect. We know EXACTLY when, why, and why that arose, and in what context. And we also know about the many hundreds of years it was fought over.
 
Of course we can know the gravity of an act. In some instances - eg abortion - we know it because the church has said explicitly that it is grave matter in any circumstances.

In other instances - such as lying - the church has said that the gravity of a lie depends on various factors, such as the nature of the truth we are deforming, the harm we do to others by our lie and so on.

In such circumstances we can still know the gravity of our sins. We can use the guidance the Church offers plus our informed conscience to make a determination that in the particular circumstances in which we lied, our lie was grave matter (eg perjuring oneself in court, on oath, would rarely if ever not be grave matter, and I think a person can use reason and informed conscience to decide which). Or that in the particular circumstances (eg telling your wife ‘no, those jeans do not make your bum look look big’ when they do) it was not grave matter.

Think of the relationship analogy. There are some misdeeds that would be a ‘deal breaker’ for pretty much any couple - infidelity, for example. It’s very easy to objectively say ‘no, you shouldn’t cheat on your spouse’.

There are others that are a ‘deal breaker’ only for some people. Every couple will have different standards as far as household chores, for example. So every couple will know that they should at least not have so much rubbish about the house that vermin is attracted or health and safety compromised, but beyond that there is no ‘one size fits all’ for each couple.

Within that couple, there will often be one partner to whom it matters more than to the other. Or times at which it matters more - eg they may be more tolerant of mess if they have a newborn baby or something.

Nonetheless, a spouse CAN oftentimes make a good guess as to what their partner’s expectations are in regard to household chores, without being explicitly told. Or decide to clean house regardless of what their partner thinks because they personally are uncomfortable with the level of mess and it is a big issue for them.

That’s how it works in our relationship with God as well. Sin is a rupture in the relationship, mortal sin is a serious one. A relationship can be ruptured equally from our side (ie by us doing things that we are not comfortable with, that we are fairly sure are grave matter) as from God’s (ie doing things that indisputably and whichever way you slice it are grave matter).
I agree with you. We know in many instances if we have committed a sin of grave matter and knowing that and still committing the act (excluding mental incapacity or coercion) means we have mortally sinned.

For example, I know it is a sin of grave matter to deliberately and without good reason miss Mass on Sunday (or Saturday evening which also fulfills the Sunday obligation). Therefore, if I get out of bed on a Sunday morning and I simply can’t be bothered to go to Mass then by missing Mass I have committed a mortal sin. No ifs or buts. That is a mortal sin.
 
I think I see where you are trying to go. Part of the “knowledge” aspect requires an understanding of the grave nature of the act. And if we can never know for sure the gravity of the act, we can never have full and complete knowledge, and thus cannot ever commit mortal sin.

And that’s a good point. I may need to reconsider my opinion that we cannot know the gravity of the act. As far as I am aware, I am the only Catholic to ever form such an opinion (I seriously doubt that I am, but it is not something I have never seen before).
Yes that is what I am trying to say.
 
And that’s a good point. I may need to reconsider my opinion that we cannot know the gravity of the act. As far as I am aware, I am the only Catholic to ever form such an opinion (I seriously doubt that I am, but it is not something I have never seen before).
If you can prove that according to the “infallible” Magisterium and provide a quote of its statement that an individual Catholic can know for certain the gravity of a sin solely by use of their conscience then I will cede that there is no difficulty (from a Catholic perspective) over the issue.

But you must provide an infallible quote from the Church otherwise your assertion that a Catholic through the use of their conscience will the know the gravity of an act is just your opinion.
 
If you can prove that according to the “infallible” Magisterium and provide a quote of its statement that an individual Catholic can know for certain the gravity of a sin solely by use of their conscience then I will cede that there is no difficulty (from a Catholic perspective) over the issue.

But you must provide an infallible quote from the Church otherwise your assertion that a Catholic through the use of their conscience will the know the gravity of an act is just your opinion.
Try reading the Catechism of the Catholic Church (a product of the Ordinary Magisterium and so one to which we must give the assent of faith) especially paragraph 1778. The link below is to that section.

It is abundantly clear from this that we CAN use our conscience to distinguish the
‘moral quality’ (including gravity) of a concrete act.

scborromeo.org/mobileccc/p3s1c1a6.htm#1776
 
Try reading the Catechism of the Catholic Church (a product of the Ordinary Magisterium and so one to which we must give the assent of faith) especially paragraph 1778. The link below is to that section.

It is abundantly clear from this that we CAN use our conscience to distinguish the
‘moral quality’ (including gravity) of a concrete act.

scborromeo.org/mobileccc/p3s1c1a6.htm#1776
But this is the ordinary Magisterium and so not infallible. I asked for a quote which is infallible.
 
But this is the ordinary Magisterium and so not infallible. I asked for a quote which is infallible.
I think you’re falling into a common error of thinking only infallible statements are binding.

Disciplinary rules, such as the requirement that we fast on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday, are exercises of the Ordinary Magisterium as well. And yet they are binding on us on pain of sin, and are no more up for discussion or debate by laypersons than the infallible dogmas.

When I say we must ‘give the assent of faith’ to anything proposed by the Ordinary Magisterium, I mean just that. The Catechism is not up for discussion or debate by laypeople any more than the Papal Encyclical outlining the dogma of the Immaculate Conception.

We MUST assent to all of it. We cannot dismiss it as mere opinion any more than we can dismiss the fasting requirement as being ‘mere opinion’ and therefore optional. Both are binding upon us.

The difference is that the disciplines, at least some of them, can and do change, such as the requirement that priests be celibate. Infallible dogma can never change.
 
For a sin to be mortal, three conditions must exist at the same time.
  1. It must be of a grave matter;
  2. It must be committed with full knowledge that it is a mortal sin;
  3. It must be committed with full consent. [Full consent means to do it “voluntarily.”] (C.C.C. # 1857)
Grave matter pertains to the 10 Commandments.

Let’s say GuyA took 5cents as he only had 95cents and a can of coke from the vending machine costs $1. He honestly doesn’t think it would fall under the ‘thou shalt not steal’ commandment because it is not an amount that would seriously affect the person from whom he is stealing. He does not mention it in Confession because he does not think it is a Mortal Sin.

GuyB steals 5cents and then in Confession mentions it and receives absolution for that and other sins he has confessed.

What occurs here?

I was taught at a young age from Catholic nuns that every person is responsible for their own Salvation and therefore we must Confess all questionable behaviour no matter how minor we think it is. The Priest knows.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top