D
Darren488
Guest
Hello, I have heard of the Catholic crusades but am not fully aware of what they were?
Madden maybe should have addressed Charlemagne’s expeditions against the Saxons, which amounted to conversion by the sword. Not all of the expansion of Islam was accomplished by military means. The Turks and other peoples of Cerntral Asia simply adopted it because of cultural and trade influences, as did the peoples of the East Indies. But the main point is well-taken. Islam is an aggressive and intolerant faith.A good place to start is in reading “What the Crusades Were Really Like”.
You could probably summarize the Crusades this way: “defensive wars”
The Jews refused to cave in to the “cultural and trade” pressures (as they usually do) and they have been persecuted by Muslims ever since. Some would say the sword would have been more merciful.Madden maybe should have addressed Charlemagne’s expeditions against the Saxons, which amounted to conversion by the sword. Not all of the expansion of Islam was accomplished by military means. The Turks and other peoples of Cerntral Asia simply adopted it because of cultural and trade influences, as did the peoples of the East Indies.
No. The Jews rebelled against Rome in 66 AD. The Roman general (and later Emperor) Titus stormed Jerusalem and destroyed the Temple in 70 AD.The Jews refused to cave in to the “cultural and trade” pressures (as they usually do) and they have been persecuted by Muslims ever since. Some would say the sword would have been more merciful.
EXCUSE me??When we consider what Christians have done to the Jews – including driving them out of Spain, Portugal and England, oppressing them and confining them to ghettos, conducting pogroms against them - and finally the Holocaust - we have little room to look down on the Muslims as persecutors of the Jews!
elvisman said:EXCUSE me??
I would HARDLY consider what Hitler did to the Jews an act by “Christians”. The “Christian world” did not slaughter millions of Jew in WWII. En evil empire, led by one of the moset twisted mids in history did. Now you sound like the anti-Catholics who claim that the Church was responsible for this - those same people rejecting the fact that through the Holy Father, Pius XII over 700,00 lives were saved!
Please do your homework before spewing out historical inaccuracies.
"Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ" - St. Jerome
Oh, yes. Germany CALLED itself a Christian nation for hundreds of years. And for a good bit of that time, they racked up a record of discrimnation against Jews – if that underlying anti-Jewish tradition hadn’t been there, there could never have been a Holocaust.Read “Salvation is from the Jews” for a look at the historical roots of the Holocost.
In short the racial policies of Nazism had it roots in Dawinism
In a culture that had turned away from Christainity.
Hitler was baptized – that makes him a Christian by definition. His nation considered itself Christian. For centuries. Many of the people who participated directly in the Holocaust considered themselves Christians.vern humphrey
I see. When someone who is formally a Christian (as Hitler was) acts in a brutal manner, we are quick to say “Well, he WASN’T a Christian.”
Hitler was not a Christian.He persecuted Catholics and Lutherans as well as Jews. Why would you call someone a Christian who behaved as Hitler did?
Why would you call Osama Bin Laden and his cohorts Muslims when they violate the basic tenents of Islam?vern
*Now, I admit they were not GOOD Christians *
It goes much deeper than that. Hitler had repudiated his Christian heritage.
Read up on the subject. According to one published source, Hitler planned to annihilate all of Christianity, not just the Jews. He massacred millions of Catholics throughout Europe, but especially in Poland.
Think about it.
As someone on another thread remarked, would anybody be allowed to call himself an atheist if he went to Mass, Confession and Communion every day?
Why would you call Hitler a Christian when he allied himself so completely with crimes against humanity?
The point is, it’s as meaningless to say “What Hitler did was an act of Christians toward Jews,” as it would be to say it was “an act of men with mustaches toward Jews.” It had nothing to do with Christian faith or culture.I see. When someone who is formally a Christian (as Hitler was) acts in a brutal manner, we are quick to say “Well, he WASN’T a Christian.”
But when a Muslim acts that way, we demand that all of Islam be held responsible.
.
I mean “you” in the general sense.vern
Why would you call Osama Bin Laden and his cohorts Muslims when they violate the basic tenents of Islam?
I never called them Muslims.
The point is that Hitler was not a Christian. Nor was his policy by any stretch of imagination a Christian policy. Whatever Christians he enlisted to do his dirty work did so with guns pointed at their heads, not necessarily as a matter of Christian policy.
And Osama Bin Laden and the suicide bombers aren’t REALLY Muslims.vern
When we face what Christians have done, we immediately jump through hoops to claim they weren’t REALLY Christians.
Hitler REALLY wasn’t Christian.
God bless.
Carl
WRONG, my friend.And Osama Bin Laden and the suicide bombers aren’t REALLY Muslims.