A
abcdefg
Guest
quoted from Albert Barnes’ Bible study notes. that guy is a Protestant(Presbyterian).
DRB
it’s a note on KJV 1Co11:27Shall eat this bread - See 1Co_11:26. Paul still calls it bread, and shows thus that he was a stranger to the doctrine that the bread was changed into the very body of the Lord Jesus. If the papal doctrine of transubstantiation had been true, Paul could not have called it bread. The Romanists do not believe that it is bread, nor would they call it such; and this shows how needful it is for them to keep the Scriptures from the people, and how impossible to express their dogmas in the language of the Bible. Let Christians adhere to the simple language of the Bible, and there is no danger of their falling into the errors of the papists.
DRB
KJV1Co 11:27 Therefore, whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord.
1Co 11:27 Wherefore whosoever, shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.