When Paul took over, law became a curse.

[paarsurrey]

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=4543399&postcount=360
Discussion on the Qu’ran and Hadit

Originally Posted by planten:

Paul, we do not have any grudge against Saul. He was an enemy till the last time of Jesus. He killed many friends of Jesus. Okay. Forgive him if he did something good afterwards. But he did not. We can see clearly that he abondoned the law of Moses a.s.

While Jesus was alive, the law was sacred and being followed by Jesus and all disciples. When paul took over, law became a curse.
He abondoned the Sabath etc. He stopped the circumcision and started the eating of the flesh of swine. None of these were in practice during the time of Jesus.

WE Muslims are justified in blaming paul for high-jacking the christians faith. If paul had followed in the footsteps of Jesus then we would have no objection. But we can see that paul started a new religion of his own, including Trinity and original sin and death on the cross etc. Jesus and his mother did not do anything wrong. They were sinless. But this sinful man paul damaged christianity beyond repair.

Jesus never predicted the conversion of a staunch enemy (paul). So there is no real conversion. Jesus did not appear to any of his true followers to tell them that paul had converted. So there is no testimony for conversion. The person who was with paul on his journey to damacus was a man for paul. His testimony is not reliable. He is not a neutral person.

We will keep on discussing the subject of paul taking over the church. If christians are happy with him, we have nothing to worry. It is their own business. They can have paul. But we will not follow the teachings of paul. There is more paul in the bible than there is Jesus. Why?

**R_not **says:

Why don’t you start a different thread on paul?

go figure.

 

[BrianH]

James, the brother of the Lord, Peter, and John met with Paul and they gave him “the right hand of fellowship”.
The decision to “eat swine” was a vision/dream by Peter, not Paul.
When we read the earliest Christian writers, like Clement, we do not see or read about a conflict between these two groups…because there was not one.