M
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
When the Church fired a man at a Catholic school who had a same-sex wedding. Article discusses the moral issues involved
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
E
Elias
Guest
The church has every right to defend it’s values. If it doesn’t than there is no freedom of religion. That’s blatantly making the Constitution hypocritical. Therefore, having the state enforce the alphabet agenda on the Church would be unconstitutional.
Last edited:
H
Hodos
Guest
“When Payne-Elliott sued the school for letting him go, he said he hoped it would “put a stop to the targeting of LGBTQ employees and their families.” That’s a convenient argument, but a phony one.”
I found this to be such an odd comment by Payne-Elliot. Presumably the school didn’t recruit him and hire him under false pretenses. Other articles that I have read indicated that this teacher signed a statement of faith and conduct as a condition of his employment. If anything, it appears that he signed this contract in bad faith, targeting the school for its pre-existing policy. It is bewildering to me that people these days join organizations with the intent to fundamentally coerce the organization to accept their personal viewpoints rather than to adapt to the viewpoints of the organizations they join or join organizations which share the same values that they do on an individual level. The nature of free association is that both parties freely engage in a mutually beneficial relationship. When one party enters into the relationship under false pretenses, they should not be subject to government protection. All this does is encourages the formation of bad faith arrangements that one side can walk out on with impunity. This is particularly true for organizations that are explicitly religious and subject to the protections of the First Amendment.
I found this to be such an odd comment by Payne-Elliot. Presumably the school didn’t recruit him and hire him under false pretenses. Other articles that I have read indicated that this teacher signed a statement of faith and conduct as a condition of his employment. If anything, it appears that he signed this contract in bad faith, targeting the school for its pre-existing policy. It is bewildering to me that people these days join organizations with the intent to fundamentally coerce the organization to accept their personal viewpoints rather than to adapt to the viewpoints of the organizations they join or join organizations which share the same values that they do on an individual level. The nature of free association is that both parties freely engage in a mutually beneficial relationship. When one party enters into the relationship under false pretenses, they should not be subject to government protection. All this does is encourages the formation of bad faith arrangements that one side can walk out on with impunity. This is particularly true for organizations that are explicitly religious and subject to the protections of the First Amendment.
Last edited:
T
TheLittleLady
Guest
I’ve yet to see a Catholic school that does not have a morals faith adherence clause in the contract.
E
EndTimes
Guest
Even though LGBQism has been deemed Satanic by some in the Catholic Hierarchy,The church has every right to defend it’s values. If it doesn’t than there is no freedom of religion. That’s blatantly making the Constitution hypocritical. Therefore, having the state enforce the alphabet agenda on the Church would be unconstitutional.
that doesn’t stop some from opposing Christ.
We’re never actually dealing with the actual Constitution, per se.
but only e.g, the Nine SCOTUS Justices majority arbitrary Opinion of the Constitution…
_
E
Elias
Guest
Well technically, in theory, those nine justices are supposed to be the Supreme Defenders of the Constitution. Unfortunately all it takes is a handful of activist judges with agendas to pass unconstitutional and illegal laws.
Just pray for our nation and hope that RGB retires or passes away soon so some sanity can return to our land.
Just pray for our nation and hope that RGB retires or passes away soon so some sanity can return to our land.
E
EndTimes
Guest
yes. And what few realize - is that it’s the Arbitrary Opinion OF the ConstitutionWell technically, in theory, those nine justices are supposed to be the Supreme Defenders of the Constitution. Unfortunately all it takes is a handful of activist judges with agendas to pass unconstitutional and illegal laws.
which becomes law
SCOTUS on The DP? Legal, Illegal, Legal… and it could become Illegal
Arbitrary law as opposed to God’s UnChanging Law
T
TC3033
Guest
I don’t remember one in mine.
JoeFreedom
New member
Right. These people do not understand that if they are successful they render contracts pointless.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.