Where do criminals fit in?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theBelgianDuke
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

theBelgianDuke

Guest
There are these conversion stories of like ex-gang members who left that life and embraced the catholic faith. Usually, in their previous lives they were involved in all sorts of illegal activity. My question: Does Church teaching require them to come forward for their crimes in order to be fully forgiven? I guess, on a larger scale, one could ask, does the Church generally require its faithful to turn themseves in if their sins happen to be crimes, too?
 
There are these conversion stories of like ex-gang members who left that life and embraced the catholic faith. Usually, in their previous lives they were involved in all sorts of illegal activity. My question: Does Church teaching require them to come forward for their crimes in order to be fully forgiven? I guess, on a larger scale, one could ask, does the Church generally require its faithful to turn themseves in if their sins happen to be crimes, too?
No of course not. The seal of the confessional protects the repentant.
 
A person cannot be required as part of the sacrament of confession to disclose anything to law enforcement.

And in many cases there are ways to repair the damage done by one’s crimes that don’t involve punishment by the criminal law (eg anonymous restitution of some kind to the victims). These may in fact be more helpful to the wrongdoer in avoiding future sin than criminal penalties.

There may be exceptions. It is possible, for example, if the only way to undo the harm is by confession to law enforcement, and the penitent has failed to do so, that the failure can be taken by the priest confessor as an indication that they are perhaps not truly contrite. In such cases absolution can be refused, but cannot be made conditional on confession to law enforcement.
 
There may be exceptions. It is possible, for example, if the only way to undo the harm is by confession to law enforcement, and the penitent has failed to do so, that the failure can be taken by the priest confessor as an indication that they are perhaps not truly contrite. In such cases absolution can be refused, but cannot be made conditional on confession to law enforcement.
That never happens. A confessor can never require the penitent to reveal his sins.
 
But can absolution be withheld because the culprit has not come forward?

ICXC NIKA
 
Father Grondin answered this question in 2013:

Can a priest require you turn yourself into the police as penance?
To require that someone turn himself in to the police would be to require him to reveal his confession to a third party… And if the absolution is essentially conditional upon this requirement it would seem to also violate canon 980. If someone is not sufficiently contrite the confessor can simply withhold absolution. If the penitent is sufficiently contrite the priest can most certainly encourage him to turn himself in to the police but to require someone to reveal their confession to another would violate canon law.
 
There are these conversion stories of like ex-gang members who left that life and embraced the catholic faith. Usually, in their previous lives they were involved in all sorts of illegal activity. My question: Does Church teaching require them to come forward for their crimes in order to be fully forgiven? I guess, on a larger scale, one could ask, does the Church generally require its faithful to turn themseves in if their sins happen to be crimes, too?
no, the church cannot require it. however, in certain situations, it would probably be the most moral course of action

that being said, if another person is receiving punishment ofr a crime you commited, one really needs to think about why you would not turn yourself in. i.e. someone else is incarcerated or about to receive the death penalty for something they didn’t do.

that may be a new sin on its own though, but I am not sure
 
That never happens. A confessor can never require the penitent to reveal his sins.
I agree, and said as much. He may not REQUIRE it. He may, however, refuse absolution in cases where it is not done.

Apologies for any confusion.
 
no, the church cannot require it. however, in certain situations, it would probably be the most moral course of action

that being said, if another person is receiving punishment ofr a crime you commited, one really needs to think about why you would not turn yourself in. i.e. someone else is incarcerated or about to receive the death penalty for something they didn’t do.

that may be a new sin on its own though, but I am not sure
As the Confiteor at Mass reminds us, we sin by what we fail to do as much as by what we do.

So not coming forward with information that may save another from unjust imprisonment or execution would appear to be a sinful species of dishonesty (in the sense of failing to provide information to which another has a right, to their hurt). And, as you say, a fresh sin over and above whatever original sin is being concealed.
 
One of the reasons it isn’t done is because secular law often conflicts with Church law.
And secular law historically, and in many countries is contrary to church law.
The authority of the state should not involve a sacrament. Though sometimes, like with marriage, it does.
 
Unfortunately in this world, it’s only going to be a matter of time before something happens somewhere and the evil ones demand that Confessions are fully revealed!
 
But can absolution be withheld because the culprit has not come forward?

ICXC NIKA
If they are going to confession and seeking absolution for these crimes, it seems they have indeed come forward.
 
There are these conversion stories of like ex-gang members who left that life and embraced the catholic faith. Usually, in their previous lives they were involved in all sorts of illegal activity. My question: Does Church teaching require them to come forward for their crimes in order to be fully forgiven? I guess, on a larger scale, one could ask, does the Church generally require its faithful to turn themseves in if their sins happen to be crimes, too?
It all depends on what they did, but more serious crimes like; rape, torture, murder, etc. - should send people straight to the stakes to be burned alive.
 
It all depends on what they did, but more serious crimes like; rape, torture, murder, etc. - should send people straight to the stakes to be burned alive.
I hope you are joking.

Unfortunately this sentiment is all too popular today, it seems once someone is even accused of doing one of these things, (not even been convicted), many people want blood, right away. I see this all the time on news articles in the comments section, when someone is ‘accused’, 98% of comments are calling for them to die in terrible ways.

It also shows an alarming trend of people siding with authority versus their fellow citizen, that is really scary imo.
 
I hope you are joking.

Unfortunately this sentiment is all too popular today, it seems once someone is even accused of doing one of these things, (not even been convicted), many people want blood, right away. I see this all the time on news articles in the comments section, when someone is ‘accused’, 98% of comments are calling for them to die in terrible ways.

It also shows an alarming trend of people siding with authority versus their fellow citizen, that is really scary imo.
Thank you for beating me to it.

Yep ; folk bay for blood… And I think of Jesus, “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone” : when those around HIm were about to do just that . Lynch mobs are not new sadly
 
I hope you are joking.

Unfortunately this sentiment is all too popular today, it seems once someone is even accused of doing one of these things, (not even been convicted), many people want blood, right away. I see this all the time on news articles in the comments section, when someone is ‘accused’, 98% of comments are calling for them to die in terrible ways.

It also shows an alarming trend of people siding with authority versus their fellow citizen, that is really scary imo.
I’m talking about convicted people. It’s only fair to seek justice, especially if someone you loved were the victim of some sick crime.

But I see you rather support criminals.
 
I’m talking about convicted people. It’s only fair to seek justice, especially if someone you loved were the victim of some sick crime.

But I see you rather support criminals.
I can’t speak on Catholic teaching, but it seems very uncharitable to assume that because someone opposes the death penalty then that means they’re “pro-criminal.”

With crimes like rape it’s more important that the victim gets the support they require and that rapists are properly convicted in the first place. Calls for the death penalty often just come out of impersonal blind rage and don’t really address the actual issue. Trying to have your revenge fantasies fulfilled in real life is not the best way to tackle crime. Keep in mind most forms of rape are date rape and similar things - you’re more likely to be raped by someone you know than the Hollywood-style rapist that attacks you in a car park. I don’t think killing rapists would properly address this issue.
 
I’m talking about convicted people. It’s only fair to seek justice, especially if someone you loved were the victim of some sick crime.

But I see you rather support criminals.
Are you familiar with the teachings of Christ? The concepts of repentance, sanctity, of life? Etc.

Convicted by which state or government? The US? Saudi Arabia? North Korea?
 
Are you familiar with the teachings of Christ? The concepts of repentance, sanctity, of life? Etc.

Convicted by which state or government? The US? Saudi Arabia? North Korea?
Clearly I’m more aware of what the Bible actually says than you. People these days tend to pick what they like to hear (in this case, the Bible).

Was the Catholic Church wrong in its teachings before the Second Vatican Council?

Are you actually okay with people having done severe crimes to be let loose?
 
Clearly I’m more aware of what the Bible actually says than you. People these days tend to pick what they like to hear (in this case, the Bible).

Was the Catholic Church wrong in its teachings before the Second Vatican Council?

Are you actually okay with people having done severe crimes to be let loose?
Oh, I’m sorry, I thought we were being serious.

I’ll bow out. There are some red flags in your post.
Have a nice day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top