Hi Mist,
The first two Catholic books I read were books I and III of a 4-volume set by Fr. John Laux called
A Course in Religion for Catholic High Schools and Academies. They were originally published in 1928, and the copies I have were printed in 1990 by TAN Books. I found them at a university bookstore, and they got me so excited about the Catholic Church that I ran out and bought a copy of the new Catechism (and read it).
Book I is
Chief Truths of the Faith: Creation, Original Sin, Christ, Faith, Grace Eternal Life, Etc., and book II is
Catholic Morality: Sin, Virtue, Conscience, Duties to God, Neighbor, Etc.
I looked on TAN Books’ website this evening, and unfortunately, both of these books are out of stock at the moment.
For an example of the type of material contained in these books, however, here is a portion of chapter 5, section 6, page 89 of
Chief Truths of the Faith:
"6. The Good Angels Love Us. – The Good Angels love us because they love God. They protect us in soul and body, pray for us and exhort us to do good. St. Paul calls them ‘ministering spirits sent to minister for them who shall receive the inheritance of salvation’ (Heb. 1,4). ‘When thou didst pray with tears, …I offered thy prayer to the Lord,’ the Angel Raphael said to Tobias (12,12).
“That everyone has a Guardian Angel has never been defined by the Church, but has always been accepted as true. Our belief is based on the words of Christ: ‘See that you despise not one of these little ones, for…their Angels in Heaven always see the face of My Father who is in Heaven’ (Matt. 18,10).”
My third Catholic book is for devotional reading, but one can learn a lot of doctrine from it, and it contains numerous Biblical references.
The book is called
My Imitation of Christ, and it is the version of Thomas A Kempis’
The Imitation of Christ which was published by the Confraternity of the Precious Blood in 1954. It is 3.5" x 5", and it has a durable, flexible cover. It also features a large number of engravings that are similar to the work of the famous 19th century Bible illustrator, Gustave Dore.
It is available from the Leaflet Missal Company in St. Paul, Minnesota for $9.95. The address of the web page for the book is too long for me to post, but the main page is
leafletonline.com/catalog/Default.aspx?, and the item number for the book is 05240.
Finally, I recommend that you get a Douay-Rheims Bible, and I recommend it for two reasons. First, the Catholic Church has only one official Bible, the Vulgate, which is in Latin, and the Douay-Rheims is the only translation of this Bible into the English language. Second, the only Bibles that I have been able to use to defend Catholic teaching are the Douay-Rheims, and the King James “Authorized” Version. I have discovered that modern translations employ “clarifications” that make it difficult or impossible to defend Catholic doctrines.
For example, Protestants like to use Matthew 1:25, “And he knew her not till she brought forth her first born son,” as one proof that St. Joseph and Mary had marital relations. 2 Samuel 6:23 says that David’s wife Michol (or “Michal”) had no children until the day she died, but 2 Samuel 21:8 says that she had 5 sons “whom she bore to Hadriel” (DRV), or “whom she brought up for Adriel” (KJV).
Based on this wording, and using the Protestant interpretation of what “until” means, one must conclude that Michol had 5 sons after she died.
The mystery is solved by looking at 1 Samuel 18:9, which identifies Hadriel (or “Adriel”) as the husband of Michol’s sister, Merob (or “Merab”). Michol’s 5 sons are actually her 5 nephews. This supports the Catholic Church’s contention that Matthew 1:25 does not mean that St. Joseph and Mary had relations after Jesus was born, and that the people identified later as his “brothers and sisters” are actually his cousins.
Unfortunately, the New American Bible changes the word “sons” (which is the Hebrew word “ben”) in 2 Samuel 21:8 to “nephews.” This is a false rendering of the text (“ben” means “son”), and it makes it impossible to use that Bible to defend Our Lady’s perpetual virginity.
I know this is a long post, but I thought it was necessary for me to explain all of these things.
Michelle