C
choy
Guest
i believe its supposed to be both hands all the time. my former pastor does not allow CITH for those who are carrying a baby. not only would he not allow the host to be handled by one hand, he’s also concerned that the babies might snatch the host from the parent’s handYes I do think that the subject is being overanalized.
I’ve seen many forms of accepting the host, right over left, left over right, hands cupped, even one handed (when the recipiant has something in the other hand such as a cane or a baby). I’ve also seen many reverent and irreverent receptions (judging by the appearance of reverence (bowing) when approaching and how one signs themselves after receiving)
In the end, God alone knows if one recieves worthily or not. The left or right and matters little, except to the person
Personally I resolved all of these issues by receiving on the tongue. I’ve never been refused (that is not permitted) and I feel that I am receiving in the most reverential way possible.
For those who prefer the hand I can only suggest, since we don’t seem to be able to give a clear instruction from Rome, that you do so in, what to you seems, the safest, and most reverential way possible.
Then give praise to God for His glorious gift to you.
Peace
James
but i know what you’re saying. there are those who try to receive CITH with one hand only. the reason CITH has been allowed again is because its an ancient practice. therefore the form of the ancient practice should be followed. if we change the form then it would become a new practice, not a re-introduction of an old one.