S
Sandalwood
Guest
MY SON!!! He did a GREAT job too!!!
I sung it this year. It was the second year Iāve done it and I agree with you⦠it totally has been one of the greatest privileges Iāve had as a cantor. The first year I did it, I was so nervous. The chant is not hard, yet it is hard, if you know what I mean. Iāve sung some of the most difficult pieces of classical vocal music, yet I think because that chant is so naked and pure, long and so important, I have to give twice my focus and concentration. Itās also a style of singing which requires as little vibrato, if not any vibrato, as possible. Most peopleās voices have a natural vibrato, so itās something one has to manipulate in the voice, although the music lends itself well to adjusting the voice to that.Did the priest or the deacon? Or a cantor? Or the choir?
Iām a cantor and have done it several times. Itās one of the greatest privileges Iāve ever had. I was not āworkingā for the Vigil this year, so we went to a different parish for a change. The program listed the tenor cantor as the one to sing it, and I was excited to hear him, as he has a gorgeous voice. I was so disappointed though, because he did not sing the melody that is usually associated with it. He used a very simple psalm tone instead. It didnāt have that wonderful, triumphant ascending fifth figure that just āmakesā the Exsultet for me.
How was yours?
Hi Betsy,Did the priest or the deacon? Or a cantor? Or the choir?
Iām a cantor and have done it several times. Itās one of the greatest privileges Iāve ever had. I was not āworkingā for the Vigil this year, so we went to a different parish for a change. The program listed the tenor cantor as the one to sing it, and I was excited to hear him, as he has a gorgeous voice. I was so disappointed though, because he did not sing the melody that is usually associated with it. He used a very simple psalm tone instead. It didnāt have that wonderful, triumphant ascending fifth figure that just āmakesā the Exsultet for me.
How was yours?
Yes, although I must say that I couldnāt understand much of what the woman was singing in English and Iām pretty familiar with the text.
I had a difficult understanding the woman as well, and this is the version I do every year, but I think it might have more to with the recording quality. Mine sounds a little distorted. I need to ask father for the new translation. I had not even thought about it until Pnewton brought it up.Yes, although I must say that I couldnāt understand much of what the woman was singing in English and Iām pretty familiar with the text.
Okay thanks.Yes, although I must say that I couldnāt understand much of what the woman was singing in English and Iām pretty familiar with the text.
She makes it sound difficult.Beautifully chanted here by Fr. Tim Hepburn, from the Archdiocese of Atlanta.![]()
I have to admit, I wasnāt that impressed by the music because it sounds very similar to what I always hear at mass. Of course the words are beautiful.URL=āā] The woman that is hard to understand, makes it sound difficult.
Iām no expert in music but I think itās whatās known as plainchant and is what is found in the Roman Missal. Itās far removed from what I usually hear at Mass.Okay thanks.
He makes it sound simple here.
She makes it sound difficult.
I have to admit, I wasnāt that impressed by the music because it sounds very similar to what I always hear at mass. Of course the words are beautiful.
I guess it would make more of an impression if one is not used to hearing Gregorian Chant?![]()
I think when you are not used to hearing chant, it would make more of an āimpressionā as you rightly observed - sometimes a bad impression and sometimes a good one. We donāt do a lot of chant at one of the parishes where I work and the congregation really likes the chanted exultet. It sort of reminds me when we had the Latin mass parts sung in the very simple chants for our wedding. Those of our guests who were not used to it were in awe, but I think if you hear it and sing it all the time (like my husband and I) you almost take it for granted.I guess it would make more of an impression if one is not used to hearing Gregorian Chant?![]()
Have you discussed this with the pastor, himself? What Iāve usually seen if a priest or deacon does not sing it, the exsultet is cut to only what the cantor can sing. Thatās what we do at the parishes where I work, since the priests and deacon donāt want to āsubjectā (as they put it) everyone to their singing voices for a long period of time. lol!**Despite many years of continued efforts to draw attention and to help reveal that a cantor should not sing the entire exultet and should omit that which has been designated to be sung by an ordained minister (deacon or priest) only, (as the written instructions noted on every printed score used for the last several decades " has implied") I am again disappointed to learn that even with the new liturgy and new music the choir will continue to have a cantor sing even that which I understand has been and continues to be reserved for an ordained minister. There has not even been a need for me to reiterate; the cantor acknowledging my historical objection and noting the pastor has said it does not really matter as neither he nor the participating deacon wish to sing. Please suggest the simplest and best conversion tool or resource we might employ to take advantage of this evangelical opportunity. Surely something like this has been noted or even discussed before. . .
Information Please. Suggestions appreciated as well. THX!
The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has never been able to overpower it.