Why blood sacrifice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonatello
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As it has been explained to me, only blood can atone for blood, since it is the physical life force of a being. Our sin caused physical death, and the only way to remit sin at that time was to forfeit the life of another being.

However, God was merciful in asking for blood from an animal instead of human blood – rather than demanding blood from the sinner’s or another person. No one was “pure enough” to atone for another man with his own blood until Christ came to us.

Now, Jesus is called the “Lamb of God,” which is a clue. A mother sheep who had lost a lamb would be encouraged to accept a new lamb to suckle, but wouldn’t accept the new lamb because it didn’t smell like her own. So, the new lamb was covered in the blood of the dead lamb. This way, the lamb was “covered in the blood” and accepted as the mother’s own.

If you recall the final plague in Egypt, this practice was applied to people, and not just animals when people had to cover their doorposts with lamb’s blood in order for the angel of death to pass by their houses. What a powerful foreshadowing!

Christ’s blood covers us in this way, washing away sin so that the Father can once again see us as “His own.” Christ’s blood is more powerful in that it doesn’t simply “cover” us as lamb’s blood would, but it effected a spiritual change in people by “washing away” sin.

The preparation for Christ’s sacrifice was using animals, until Christ willingly became the “Paschal Lamb” for us.
 
Actually it all falls on the idea of 'covenant" Covenants were always sealed with blood.
 
As it has been explained to me, only blood can atone for blood, since it is the physical life force of a being. Our sin caused physical death, and the only way to remit sin at that time was to forfeit the life of another being.

However, God was merciful in asking for blood from an animal instead of human blood – rather than demanding blood from the sinner’s or another person. No one was “pure enough” to atone for another man with his own blood until Christ came to us.

Now, Jesus is called the “Lamb of God,” which is a clue. A mother sheep who had lost a lamb would be encouraged to accept a new lamb to suckle, but wouldn’t accept the new lamb because it didn’t smell like her own. So, the new lamb was covered in the blood of the dead lamb. This way, the lamb was “covered in the blood” and accepted as the mother’s own.

If you recall the final plague in Egypt, this practice was applied to people, and not just animals when people had to cover their doorposts with lamb’s blood in order for the angel of death to pass by their houses. What a powerful** foreshadowing!**

Christ’s blood covers us in this way, washing away sin so that the Father can once again see us as “His own.” Christ’s blood is more powerful in that it doesn’t simply “cover” us as lamb’s blood would, but it effected a spiritual change in people by “washing away” sin.

The preparation for Christ’s sacrifice was using animals, until Christ willingly became the “Paschal Lamb” for us.
Wonderful sentiments, but the main point missed, I think, is how efficacious is it, how effective is it in relation to God. Not that this is bad or wrong in any way or form but it doesn’t seem to show the conversion away from sin. Sin separates us from God, as seen in the book of Genesis, and as God is transcendent, Father, not immanent, mother, then He comes to us by love and we to Him by Grace. We lose this Grace by sin as opposed to some Protestant theology that sees grace as given as a gift without any action on our part and thus no action is required to keep it. The way Jesus gave us to regain this grace is confession and to build it is works of love, that is charity, not feeling.

The effectiveness inherent in the Sacrifice of Jesus is that sin equals death, spiritual death, as when the devil said Adam and Eve wouldn’t die they didn’t die physically but spiritually, thus could not enter into heaven which isn’t a place but a union, union with God. God is Holiness and Justice and Mercy Itself and as one cannot forgive a debt without becoming poorer in direct proportion to the debt forgiven, the Justice of God indicates that He cannot become less Holy in order to accept us as less holy, so a price, which we could not pay, was so lovingly and mercifully given by the Incarnation and the sacrifice of Calvary. Jesus did not do His will but the Will of the One who sent Him. It seems that we are to do that too.
 
That’s where I think the analogy is complete – the conversion happens when the sheep accepts the new parent and lives/loves accordingly.

As I am covered in the blood, I am accepted by the Father, and then I leave the dead life, the sin behind. I amend my life to act accordingly, in gratefulness for having been covered. Through the blood of the Lamb of sacrifice, I begin the conversion process and live for my new and total Father.
 
Blood sacrifice is really a way to say thank you to God for providing the food and the world that we live in.
 
before the sacrifice of Christ, all those before who believed in sacirfice for the atonement of sins went to their death waiting for Jesus’s own sacrifice to take them to paradise or heaven. At his resurection he took them with him. I believe animal sacrifice was an atonement for their guilt and Christ sacirfice was what took them to purgatory or heaven
Yes he descended to the dead to pick up Moses and the rest.
This** is **a good thread I will like to read more as I need to learn more.
 
Is there a good explanation out there?

Why did the Jews, before Jesus, need to shed the blood of an animal to please God? I mean, we all can obviously see how it pretty much resembles all sorts of other ancient pagan traditions from all over the world.

What makes this one “really the will of God” and what did God actually want with the slaughtered animal’s blood?

Moving forward, how does this relate to Jesus seemingly needing to mimic that pagan ritual literally to save mankind?

Do you think maybe there is something truly in the ripping and tearing of Jesus’ flesh that, through the actual relationship spiritual has with physical, unlocks and activates a real life-saving response, maybe by physically literally joining God’s soul with our bodies?

And then maybe, since “time” is all seen at once from God’s perspective, people “before” Jesus’ walk in our flesh were somehow tapping into this moment in some small area of their consciousness (where physical and spiritual are possibly bridged) and, feeling a vague sense of the need for this occurrence, commenced to sacrificing men, animals, etc for God(s) as they understood Him to be?

But then still…was God actually sanctioning these other crucifixion “dress-rehearsals”?

were non-Jesus sacrifices crucifixion dress-rehearsals?

was Jesus’ sacrifice a decided mimic of their idea of blood sacrifices?

or was the blood sacrifice of non-Jesus life truly willed by God, and why?
Hebrews Chap 10 speaks to this issue and includes the prophecy in Jer 31 as khruuton mentioned in his post. It’s worth reading the whole chapter.

**…3But those sacrifices are an annual reminder of sins, 4because it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.

5Therefore, when Christ came into the world, he said:
"Sacrifice and offering you did not desire,
but a body you prepared for me;
6with burnt offerings and sin offerings
you were not pleased.
7Then I said, ‘Here I am—it is written about me in the scroll—
I have come to do your will, O God.’ "…
**
 
Ex. 12:13 “when I see the blood, I wil pass over you”

Lev. 17:11 “For the life of a creature is in the blood, and I have given it to you to make atonement for yourselves on the altar; it is the blood that makes an atonement for one’s life.”

1 John 1:7 “the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanses us from all sin.”

Col. 1:14 “In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins.”

Heb. 10:12 “But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God”
 
**Read John **6 (King James Version)

26Jesus answered them and said, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Ye seek me, not because ye saw the miracles, but because ye did eat of the loaves, and were filled.

27Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed.

28Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?

29Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

30They said therefore unto him, What sign shewest thou then, that we may see, and believe thee? what dost thou work?

31Our fathers did eat manna in the desert; as it is written, He gave them bread from heaven to eat.

32Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Moses gave you not that bread from heaven; but my Father giveth you the true bread from heaven.

33For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life unto the world.

34Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread.

35And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.

36But I said unto you, That ye also have seen me, and believe not.

37All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.

38For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.

39And this is the Father’s will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.

40And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.

41The Jews then murmured at him, because he said, I am the bread which came down from heaven.

42And they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? how is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?

43Jesus therefore answered and said unto them, Murmur not among yourselves.

44No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.

45It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me.

46Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father.

47Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.

48I am that bread of life.

49Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.

50This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.

51I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.

52The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?

53Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.

54Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

55For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.

56He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.

57As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.

58This is that bread which came down from heaven not as your fathers** did eat manna:, and are dead**: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.

59These things said he in the synagogue, as he taught in Capernaum.

60Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it?

61When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?

62What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

63It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you**, they are spirit**, and they are** life**.

64But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.

65And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.

66From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.
 
Read John 6 (King James Version)

52The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?

53Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, **Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. **

54Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

55For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.

56He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him.

57As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me.

58This is that bread which came down from heaven:** not** as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.

59These things said he in the synagogue, as he taught in Capernaum.

** 60Many therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, This is an hard saying; who can hear it**?

61When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you?
…
…
…

66From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him.
Did you read what you just cut and pasted???

Come back to the Eucharist, the true Body and Blood of Jesus Christ, so that you might live and have eternal life. Or doth this offend you? Don’t be like many of his disciples who went back and walked no more with him. Come Home.
 
GraceandGlory…

63It is the spirit that quickeneth; the** flesh profiteth nothing**: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

God was speaking** spiritually **and some saw it as literally. God was not speaking in a literal sense. He was speaking again in “spirit”.

I noticed you removed the reference to the above when you replied? Curious as to why?
 
GraceandGlory…

63It is the spirit that quickeneth; the** flesh profiteth nothing**: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

God was speaking** spiritually **and some saw it as literally. God was not speaking in a literal sense. He was speaking again in “spirit”.

I noticed you removed the reference to the above when you replied? Curious as to why?
I would assume space reasons and that the gist of the post was well established by the point at which it was shortened.

On the point of symbolic prose, it is well established in Catholicism that Jesus was not speaking spiritually, or more appropriately, symbolically as this would indicate Jesus let the multitudes, who seemingly misunderstood Him, leave for no other reason than He didn’t tell them that He was speaking in such a manner. Repeating it several times also refutes this view.

No, it is unthinkable that Jesus would turn the Jewish Seder meal into a symbolic act when the Passover lamb had so much meaning. Remember that John 6 takes place exactly one year before the Crucifixion which happened during Passover! The Last Supper was the New Covenant, the new Passover. The Passover was to be celebrated as if one were actually at the Exodus from Egypt. Unleavened bread because of no time to let the dough rise, bitter herbs to recall in actuality the bitterness of captivity, and sandals on your feet as if one were leaving for the promised land. Not symbolism. God is offering Himself.

Working out one’s salvation takes much less “fear and trembling” when one reduces the Holy Bible to symbolism, save to the literal views one actually takes literally, and reduces the depth of the ocean of truth to a shallow pool. Please read: catholic.com/library/Christ_in_the_Eucharist.asp
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top