Why did Pope Leo XIII approve Christopher Columbus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HailStarofSea
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Gaber said:
I’m sorry… you need new evidence?
Click to expand...
Rolltide said:
Let me also point out, just for the sake of clarification, that “revisionism” is not the same as “revisionist history”. Revisionist history is re-examining an old historical question in the face of new evidence. …
Click to expand...
Of course I asked for new evidence, because if he was a genocidal maniac based on old evidence, the fact would have come out years, if not centuries, ago. Otherwise, his being declared a genocidal maniac now without new evidence would be, to repeat,
George_Stegmeir said:
…A failure to observe this rule results in revisionism; that is, historical record distorted to accomodate a contemporary political slant…a cardinal sin for true intellectuals!
Click to expand...
 
sedonaman said:
Of course I asked for new evidence, because if he was a genocidal maniac based on old evidence, the fact would have come out years, if not centuries, ago. Otherwise, his being declared a genocidal maniac now without new evidence would be, to repeat,
Click to expand...
Perhaps you might profit from some re-education on re-visionism. Hey, good luck dude!*
  • a word judiciously used in its original, non revisionist way, free of new evidence.
 
Gaber said:
Perhaps you might profit from some re-education on re-visionism. Hey, good luck dude!*
  • a word judiciously used in its original, non revisionist way, free of new evidence.
Click to expand...
Perhaps you might profit from some de-programing of the brainwashing you got in “school”. Hey, good luck dude!*
  • ditto.
 
I asked for new witness, because if he was a genocidal maniac based on old evidence, the fact would have come out years, if not centuries, ago. Otherwise, his being declared a genocidal maniac now without new evidence would be, to repeat,

Columbus Locksmith
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top