G
GreenLantern
Guest
Is it because the latter has pagan connotations?
And some Anglicans don’t say either. I occasionally will refer to a female in sacerdotal garments, but that’s about it.I’ll bet.
Words have power. Words have meaning. Words have emotional connotations beyond their dictionary definitions.
In English, “priest” means an ordained man within a religious practice. “Priestess,” however, means something less mainstream Christianity to most people than just a woman who has been ordained, something more along the lines of ancient tribal rituals.
If I were Anglican, I would use the term “female priest.”
I’m Catholic, however, and we don’t have that particular issue.![]()
We don’t normally speak today of an “aviatrix” or a “schoolmistress.” We don’t call female college students “co-eds.” We tend to use gender-neutral terms for vocations whenever possible. We don’t assume that the male is the norm and the female the exception.The deliberate use of a specifically feminine version of such a noun is both archaic and demeaning. In this particular case the demeaning connotations of the word are almost always deliberately intended.Is it because the latter has pagan connotations?
Looks like this will not be an issue for you since the Vatican has issued a decree against women priest.I’m Catholic, however, and we don’t have that particular issue.![]()