T
Tsuwano
Guest
I don’t think these answers are simple at all. They merely reflect the fact that the homily is not the emotional or spiritual high point of the Catholic liturgy. It is true that the homily is a very important part of the liturgy and that the priest should use a variety of means to help his listeners receive and understand his message, but this does not necessarily entail using the same preaching style utilized by many evangelical preachers. I have nothing against this particular style of preaching if it is effective and does not distract the worshipers from the high point of the liturgy. The priest, like Fr. Pfleger, should know his flock and seek to speak to them in ways they can comprehend, but an “Amen Corner” is not necessary in order for Catholic worshipers to reveal the depth of their faith in “every fiber of their hearts and souls.” Reception of the Holy Eucharist reveals this.Wow…the simplicity of the answers is dazzling. For a group (Catholics) so in love with oral tradition there is no understanding of how speaking techniques impact the preaching of various regions and cultures. And, be aware that some protestants will leave a mass thinking the priest must not feel very strongly about what he was saying since he spoke so softly and barely made eye contact. Now, I know that isn’t the case. And, my good Catholic friends also know that the “amen corner” at the nearby predominantly African-American baptist church doesn’t exist to be part of a show but rather because those in attendance feel it and believe with every fiber of their hearts and souls.
I’ve heard homilies that lasted 10 minutes that felt like hours. I’ve heard 90 minute sermons that felt like the blink of an eye. I’ve seen young pastors and priests look like old, feeble men after five minutes in the pulpit. I’ve seen an 82 year old pastor attack a sermon like a man 1/4 that age and leave the college grad and the grade school child both feeling they’d been talked to on their own level.
…and there is always Father Pfleger