Why do Catholics distrust Muslims?

[GraceDK]

Here is something for your review Bev:

cbsnews.com/2100-215_162-1893879.html

Exactly… and these statistics are the same in other European countries as well. Its really sad that so many especially left wing people have a false tolerance for the ideology of islam.

Remember that Hitler was just one lunatic who wrote a develish book, came out of prison and attracted some other no-goodders… this violent gang became the SS… highly civilised Germany became the horror of Europe because a few poisonous people came in and took over the power and good people didn’t realise things could go that bad…

By the way… I don’t believe the last statements in the article, that Muslims in America are far better citizens than in Europe. Yes you have a lot of public patriotism over there… however, read the book by Mark Gabriel, a former imam and scholar in islamic history. He said that alot of anti-American talk is heard in American mosques… Islam is by nature anti-democratic.

 

[Sam_777]

He said that alot of anti-American talk is heard in American mosques…

Mosques in Saudi Arabia are not only anti-American but also anti-Chrisitans and anti-Judaism, they feel proud of themselves when they repeat the curses of Muhammed :dts:…

 

[MartinJordan]

This may not be the place to ask this but why does the Koran have a statement that (now bear with me Im maybe way off here) said that only Governments can wage war and that no individual may do it.

I understand this is where Muslims (the non-extremist) say that “yes, here it is we don’t wage wars, whoever does so is taken the teachings and abusing it” etc etc “so we’re a religion of peace” . But what perplexes me is that the said Koran having giving this kind of ruling seems to be mixing State and Religion.

Whereas, in Christianity the statement is by our Lord Jesus “love your enemies…”

Therefore, Im kind of uncomfortable with the Koran giving this stipulation. Can someone shed some light on this? What is the motive? Why should they have such stipulation?

MJ

 

[Armyvet007]

This may not be the place to ask this but why does the Koran have a statement that (now bear with me Im maybe way off here) said that only Governments can wage war and that no individual may do it.

I understand this is where Muslims (the non-extremist) say that “yes, here it is we don’t wage wars, whoever does so is taken the teachings and abusing it” etc etc “so we’re a religion of peace” . But what perplexes me is that the said Koran having giving this kind of ruling seems to be mixing State and Religion.

Whereas, in Christianity the statement is by our Lord Jesus “love your enemies…”

Therefore, Im kind of uncomfortable with the Koran giving this stipulation. Can someone shed some light on this? What is the motive? Why should they have such stipulation?

MJ

As I understand it, Islam does not seperate state and religion.

 

[Aaronmc90]

As I understand it, Islam does not seperate state and religion.

True, there really isn’t mosque and state in a true muslim society, the mosque is the state and the decisions of governance are made by the ulemma council, the religious scholars who justify legislation by the Shariah, all other types of government in islam are considered bidah (Innovation) and it falls under the sin of Shirk (associating partners with allah) since islam through the quran and sunnah prescribes a supposedly divinely revealed law, anything else is man made and in effect is trying to equate or replace allah with man, hence why it’s considered shirk

Muslims who claim they love they’re country or are against violence are either practicing taqqiya or simply do not know the religion very well…

Typically when speaking about islam I don’t usually go into the political aspect of it, yes islam is violent, yes islam promotes pedophilia, but that doesn’t inherently make it wrong, if it’s true, we couldn’t judge the divine through a human lense to begin with, so I talk about WHY islam is wrong…

The scientific errors of the quran, historical errors and time conflation, muhammeds confusion of what other religions believed and lack of understanding of how the world worked, even a casual reading of the quran proves it’s nothing but a very man made book and exactly, as I said in my prior post, what one would expect from an ignorant bedouin of the 7th century, containing all the errors, commonly held pagan folklore (djinns, black magic) and other absurdities and contradictions, the quran is a book of it’s time and place, in every way shape and form a creation of a very ignorant man or group of men

 

[exoflare]

“Why do Catholics distrust Muslims?”

Reason #93

youtube.com/watch?v=H754R9tX2UY

“There is a beating etiquette.” rolleyes

“All these things honor the woman.”

“The honoring of the wife in Islam is also evident in the fact that the punishment of beating is permissible in one case only: when she refuses to sleep with him.”

 

[Bev17243]

“Why do Catholics distrust Muslims?”

Reason #93

youtube.com/watch?v=H754R9tX2UY

“There is a beating etiquette.” rolleyes

“All these things honor the woman.”

“The honoring of the wife in Islam is also evident in the fact that the punishment of beating is permissible in one case only: when she refuses to sleep with him.”

Well, it “honors” the woman because after all, all these mullahs asking men not to hit women too hard and not to “damage them and make them ugly”. Too bad all these men don’t take their advice

 

[megazh0pa]

Pork is still not consumed today based on several grounds. In addition to a total Qur’anic ban, which is generally sufficient for Muslims, Islamic scholars cite several other reasons for Muslims not being allowed to eat pork.

Firstly, pork is viewed as having little benefits to eating it, as it is generally quite fatty and causes heart problems, hypertension and even the likes of parasites including pinworms and tapeworms. Cooking pork well is not a guarantee that these parasites will be killed either, as studies have shown that sufferers of these parasites often DID cook the meat properly.

Secondly, pigs are seen as filthy animals in Islam. Even in modern conditions, they will still eat their own excrement and dirt, as well as foraging in the mud for food.

With both pork and alcohol, the benefits of consumption are FAR outweighed by the consequences.

It matters because it was a case of British citizens attacking British citizens, and religion came second. There have been plenty of attacks of British citizens by their own which had nothing to do with Islam. Religion isn’t the single thing to connect these attacks.

But that is all a lie too… You can’t stop lying. Muslims eat pork and drink alcohol, while actively trying to deceive the “enemy”! Seriously… The enemy being me! I go to work and I go to mass on Sundays, still I am an ‘enemy’. I am not trying to plot and kill Muslims… Eventhough Muslims have killed more Muslims than Christians ever have… I am the ‘enemy’!!! If you ask me the ‘enemy’ (peace be upon him) cares more about their Sacrements than you ever will. Now I am irritated by your complete arrogant/ignorrance.

 

[Eric_Hilbert]

Thanks to all who participated.
Thread closed.