Why do liberals call "progressive" taking society back to the time of Sodom and Gomorrah?

  • Thread starter Thread starter livingwordunity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

livingwordunity

Guest
Taking society back to being like Sodom and Gomorrah is taking us backwards, not forwards.
 
Because apparently “equal” dictates “exactly identical opportunities,” not just “different, but equally important”
 
Perhaps the story of Abraham’s trip to Sodom in the company of the two angels will be rewritten soon. In the new version, Abraham will be presented with a court order stating that God must treat the inhabitants of Sodom as equal, no matter their sexual practices. Thus there will be no case against them, and Abraham will return home, Lot’s wife avoiding becoming a pillar of salt.
 
Progressives remind me of the hippie leaders of the 60s. Many came from the type of wealthy homes where the kids are given everything except love and attention from their jet setting parents. This creates a subconscious anger at the parents which is then transferred to “the establishment” which is blamed for taking their parents away from them. They then simply wipe out and parental or ancestral teachings and treat everything they conjur up in their own dysfunctional mind as new, original, and therefore “progressive” without regard for how often the idea has failed historically.
 
Because they believe they are the ones doing the “compassionate” thing. And you know what, the majority are on their side, Catholics included! And I see this coming as plain as day, as time goes by and so-called SSM becomes ingrained into society…let’s see how compassionate and tolerant they are to the RCC and Christianity in general who continue to have and hold onto opposing views to this…don’t hold your breath! *(I’m an optimistic sort, aren’t I *?) 🙂 By the way, here’s what I see happening here in the U.S as time goes by.;
catholicexchange.com/christians-persecuted-through-a-tyranny-of-nice/

Peace, Mark
 
That’s what I suggest.

What posture are we going to take? Might it not be important to establish once and for all very clearly who Obama is serving? Vis a vis ‘liberal:’ ** It isn’t just a matter of difference of opinion**, or seeing ‘it’ whatever the issue one way or another. That is exactly what they want you to think. Vast numbers of people let it go at that, unfortunately for our country and the future.

Who is Obama serving? It’s not ‘liberals’ per se.

Anyone who can figure out who is he serving, will, with a little more research, have the answer as to what is happening in the United States, and the West.

Was the Russian Revolution instigated by the Russian people? Did they assassinate the czar and his family in the farmhouse at midnight - by the way - the assassins filmed this and it can be viewed online - the deaths of the entire family who were brought into the basement at midnight - you see them marched down the stairs - on the pretext of a family photo op.

Well, it was a photo op, and proof was needed. Answer is: no!
 
Mark121359 said:
Because they believe they are the ones doing the “compassionate” thing. And you know what, the majority are on their side, Catholics included! And I see this coming as plain as day, as time goes by and so-called SSM becomes ingrained into society…let’s see how compassionate and tolerant they are to the RCC and Christianity in general who continue to have and hold onto opposing views to this…don’t hold your breath! *(I’m an optimistic sort, aren’t I *?) 🙂 By the way, here’s what I see happening here in the U.S as time goes by.;
catholicexchange.com/christians-persecuted-through-a-tyranny-of-nice/

Peace, Mark
Click to expand...
Yes, persecution begins with lawsuits and “human rights commissions” which will suppress free speech and suppress religious freedom, but it will get much more vicious.
 
We’re living in the midst of a digital revolution and the world is drastically changing. Along with this rapid change is a lot of chaos as cultures catches up with the revolution. Just look at how much our world has changed over the past 150 years! In time, society will once again adopt religious morals. Until then, you can blame liberals, but it’s really all a part of the secret agenda set up by those who actually run the world. We do not live in a democracy! Never did!

The liberal-conservative dichotomy simply does not exist (anymore). You cannot get the liberal-conservative continuum to load on the same factor, as I have tried several times as a research psychologist. If anything, these independent factors form four quadrants, with high-high being a humanitarian quadrant and low-low being an apathy quadrant, in addition to the traditional high-low and low-high quadrant. The humanitarian quadrant was the most powerful of the four quadrants, containing the ‘best’ of the liberal and conservative stereotypes.
 
That’s only if you interpret that story as literal, not as an allegory.
 
I’m still not sure what a liberal is, if I’m honest. It seems to be a very ill-defined word, and most of the time the people being called ‘liberals’ don’t even identify by that label. I’ve noticed that it’s often used as some kind of insult, or applied to anyone who has opinions that you don’t share.

At any rate, I wouldn’t imagine many people that you’d consider to be ‘liberals’ believe in Sodom and Gomorrah (or, at least, don’t genuinely believe the biblical story of Sodom and Gomorrah) and certainly wouldn’t share your morality. I’d also question your ability to actually know what Sodom and Gomorrah, rather than some rough idea about homosexuality and sinning. For all we know the Sodomites could have been doing all kinds of things that are currently illegal.
 
livingwordunity said:
Taking society back to being like Sodom and Gomorrah is taking us backwards, not forwards.
Click to expand...
And taking it back to a medieval time where we’re ruled by kings and bishops and when homosexuals are burned at the stake won’t help either :rolleyes:

But seriously I think you’re overreacting to this whole thing “sodom” thing. And I’m saying this as a celibate homosexual.
 
mitex said:
And taking it back to a medieval time where we’re ruled by kings and bishops and when homosexuals are burned at the stake won’t help either :rolleyes:

But seriously I think you’re overreacting to this whole thing “sodom” thing. And I’m saying this as a celibate homosexual.
Click to expand...
Perhaps. But of course, “Sodom” was not filled with celibate homosexuals. Likely neither is the pro-gay marriage movement.
 
mitex said:
And taking it back to a medieval time where we’re ruled by kings and bishops and when homosexuals are burned at the stake won’t help either :rolleyes:

But seriously I think you’re overreacting to this whole thing “sodom” thing. And I’m saying this as a celibate homosexual.
Click to expand...
The Enlightenment’s Reign of Terror was far worse than the rule of Catholic Kings. “The Reign of Terror was a a 10-month period during the French Revolution in which suspected enemies of the revolution were guillotined by the thousands.” (Source) These “suspected enemies” included many leaders of the French Revolution who lost their heads because of this paranoid witch hunt called the French Revolution. The “Enlightenment” was a crazy blood bath.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top