We presently have a bishop trimming our diocese down to ONE HALF of the number of churches. What we have found, is that he is closing the established traditional-architecture churches which have been around a long time and have no debt, in order to keep open the modern churches steeped in debt…so what we are to be left with are the modern structures lacking traditional Catholic beauty to pay down their debt on the backs of traditional Catholic structures/communities. What’s so sad is although the debt may be brought down, the numbers of practicing Catholics will drop with it. Many old people tied to their communities will not drive to the “newly assigned” parishes.
.
We had the opposite in the Arch Dioceses of Boston. The modern style churches, were usually in the more affluent areas of the dioceses, and had no debt. People were shocked when Cardinal O’Malley chose the modern debt free church to close, over the old in the red, church.
The logic was sound economics and good stewardship, in the Church’s mission to serve the poor.
The Churches in the poorer areas, which were the old style architecture, everyone in in the town could get to them. The newer suburbia located churches, only those who lived there or could drive, could get to those churches.
Also, real-estate value, the modern church property got more, than the old style church, in an less lucrative area.
So, the new churches were closed and the older one’s stayed open.
That all being said, I don’t think architecture played any role, but economics and stewardship, did.
In my own dioceses of Worcester, we don’t have many modern style churches, so, the parishes that are closing, are going to cost lots of money to tear down.
Jim