C
Cavalier
Guest
Hi there,
Thanks so much btw for Fr. Vincent’s previous answer to my last question on our Lady’s Perpetual Virginity – it was really helpful! I have another question if I may that I’d like to ask regarding our Lady’s Immaculate Conception.
It occurred to me that if God could save our Lady through making sure that she was conceived immaculately (due to the merits of our Lord Jesus Christ on the Cross applied retroactively on her behalf, as it were), could He not do the same for us? In which case, why doesn’t He?
I mean, it makes sense that our Lord would allow us to be conceived in sin up until the Crucifixion of Christ, because it was only through man’s sin (particularly that of the Roman authorities and the Sanhedrin) that this was possible, and therefore only through sin that Christ’s sacrifice was possible. God destroyed sin by using it to Good.
However, after the Crucifixion, when the battle against Sin and Evil is (ultimately) won by Christ, surely there need be no more need for sin in order that God might accomplish His purpose of saving mankind? So, why not then, based on the merits of His Son, ensure that all human beings were immaculately conceived after the Cross? Why allow us to fall into concupiscence and sin when He could just as easily save us from those consequences? Especially since surely He would, by doing so, be able to save so many more people (if not all mankind)?
Any thoughts you might have that would help me with this dilemma would be very much appreciated!
Thanks so much in advance, and the Grace and Peace of Christ be with you always,
Peter
Thanks so much btw for Fr. Vincent’s previous answer to my last question on our Lady’s Perpetual Virginity – it was really helpful! I have another question if I may that I’d like to ask regarding our Lady’s Immaculate Conception.
It occurred to me that if God could save our Lady through making sure that she was conceived immaculately (due to the merits of our Lord Jesus Christ on the Cross applied retroactively on her behalf, as it were), could He not do the same for us? In which case, why doesn’t He?
I mean, it makes sense that our Lord would allow us to be conceived in sin up until the Crucifixion of Christ, because it was only through man’s sin (particularly that of the Roman authorities and the Sanhedrin) that this was possible, and therefore only through sin that Christ’s sacrifice was possible. God destroyed sin by using it to Good.
However, after the Crucifixion, when the battle against Sin and Evil is (ultimately) won by Christ, surely there need be no more need for sin in order that God might accomplish His purpose of saving mankind? So, why not then, based on the merits of His Son, ensure that all human beings were immaculately conceived after the Cross? Why allow us to fall into concupiscence and sin when He could just as easily save us from those consequences? Especially since surely He would, by doing so, be able to save so many more people (if not all mankind)?
Any thoughts you might have that would help me with this dilemma would be very much appreciated!
Thanks so much in advance, and the Grace and Peace of Christ be with you always,
Peter