Why every single marital act is supposed to be ordered to procreation

[mark_a]

No, by definition, a procreative act is an act capable of reproducing. Any sexual activity other than intercourse when I women is actually able to conceive is not procreative. Sex at any time other than when a woman is in a state of her cycle where she can be impregnated is not procreative. That is the meaning of the word.

What is commonly called procreative in Christian parlance would more accurately be called acts which mimic acts which are procreative. There is a difference.

Man, that’s what I call splittin’ hairs.

 

[Jaaanosik]

…
Human reason must discern what those laws of nature are. Human reason does define what the nature of things is and human reason does indeed define models for a better understanding of things in the natural world. In science, there are many ‘models’ used to describe the nature of things. An objective model, is Natural Law and its morality which describes how humans ought to live and behave.
…

Human reason does not define nature of things that were created by God.
Human reason tries to identify/observe/understand nature of things as well as God’s good work - the Natural Moral Law.
How close is our model of the natural moral law to the Truth?

 

[thewanderer]

Jaaanosik:

I’ve now read the majority report from the commission, but I do not see how it effects any of my arguments, perhaps it would help if you would go over my previous posts and tell me why you do not agree with them/ where the logic falls short/ what you don’t understand about them?