Why give us the Bible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seekingthetruth
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Seekingthetruth

Guest
The title says it all, this is a question I was asked by an atheist. “Why does God choose to communicate via a book, aka the Bible, why not speak to everyone himself?” Pretty much a new spin on the divine hiddeness question. While I can communicate that we have a church, not just a book, thinking about it they brought up a great question. How would everyone on here respond?
 
God is smarter than we are. His reasons for doing things like this far surpass what we can imagine, I think.

I do this a lot. I say, “God, these are the options that would fix my problem” and I then realize that God isn’t limited to the possibilities I think exist.

But really, if God spoke to everyone individually atheists would dismiss it and say something like, “what proof is there that this voice we all hear is God?” Then again, I think God DOES speak to us in other ways…some people just recognize it while others might say it’s “coincidence” or the like. Even in scripture this happens…some hear the voice, others say it was thunder; some see the apostles speaking in tongues and say, “they’re drunk with wine!”
 
It is possible to hear the voice of God in this life. I know it because I’ve experienced it. I remember being at my cousin’s wedding. When the reception was over, my family and I headed back to our hotel room to sleep. But before I slept, I heard a voice tell me “No, don’t go to sleep yet. I want you to pray for unity in the church”. So I did; I prayed for unity and then went to sleep. Numerous times I have asked the Lord if it was Him, He has always said yes.

It couldn’t have been a demon because a demon would not want me to draw near to God by praying to Him.

Another time I heard from God in regards to fasting. Fasting was on my mind this time. I was at Mcdonald’s and I was at the station where you pick the kind of soft drink you want and then you push a button and the pop comes out. I wanted to get a Coke, but at the same time, I wanted the Lord’s approval. I asked “Lord, what should I get?”, and He said “diet coke”. It wouldn’t have been my first choice, but I got the diet coke and drank it. Later that night, I heard the Lord again. He said “What did you want to get?”, I said “a Coke”. He said “And what did I let you get?”, I said “A diet coke”. He said “Well congratulations, you just fasted from having a coke!”.

One can hear the voice of the Lord, you just have to be humble enough to do what He says. I don’t care if He tells you to buy a homeless man a bagel or if He tells you to pray over your meal. You have to do it. So many people want to talk to God, but they’re too busy running their mouth to hear God’s response. You may not like what He has to say, but He’s there. I know for a fact that God has spoken to me; I would bet my soul on it. Just be open to hearing Him and ask Him to speak to you.
 
“Why does God choose to communicate via a book, aka the Bible, why not speak to everyone himself?”
Luke 20:9-18

9 And he began to tell the people this parable: “A man planted a vineyard and let it out to tenants and went into another country for a long while. 10 When the time came, he sent a servant[a] to the tenants, so that they would give him some of the fruit of the vineyard. But the tenants beat him and sent him away empty-handed.11 And he sent another servant. But they also beat and treated him shamefully, and sent him away empty-handed. 12 And he sent yet a third. This one also they wounded and cast out. 13 Then the owner of the vineyard said, ‘What shall I do? I will send my beloved son; perhaps they will respect him.’ 14 But when the tenants saw him, they said to themselves, ‘This is the heir. Let us kill him, so that the inheritance may be ours.’ 15 And they threw him out of the vineyard and killed him. What then will the owner of the vineyard do to them? 16 He will come and destroy those tenants and give the vineyard to others.” When they heard this, they said, “Surely not!” 17 But he looked directly at them and said, “What then is this that is written:

“‘The stone that the builders rejected
has become the cornerstone’?[b]

18 Everyone who falls on that stone will be broken to pieces, and when it falls on anyone, it will crush him.”
 
According to teachings on original sin, man preferred himself to God. And hides from Him even. If we ever wonder why this world is so imperfect, why people sin, why people lack innocence, why people lie and misrepresent who they are, why we lack the full happiness we seek, why we’re often in competition and strife with each other, and within ourselves, why people can be so selfish and self-righteous with all the problems that results in, we might begin to understand that we really don’t necessarily want God/truth; we’d rather try going it on our own to see for ourselves what might make us happy or fulfilled, apart from divine moral constraints. As Augustine once said, “Lord, grant me continence (moral integrity), but not quite yet”.

Man is sort of his own god in this world, and the pride that underlies this fact is our biggest enemy, and the ultimate cause of all sin. And pride is shallow, and cowardly, craving the attention of others, more concerned with how things look on the outside at any given time than how they are on the inside, concerned with appearances more than truth. Pride is always willing to compromise or sacrifice truth, in fact, to make us look better. Or make us feel like garbage when we fail to live up to its “standards”.

Anyway, this world is a place where we can experiment with the effects of creatures playing God while also experiencing our limitations including moral weaknesses resulting in suffering caused by sin, physical weaknesses such as illness and ultimately death. We’re here to learn of the evil in the Master having gone away, to develop a hunger and thirst for righteouesness, for God, in an ultimately hopeless and dying and godless world.

"For you know that it was not with perishable things such as silver or gold that you were redeemed from the empty way of life handed down to you from your ancestors," 1 Pet 1:18

We’re here to gain wisdom, if we will, with the experience of good, evil, knowledge/revelation and grace playing their parts. So that we may run back to the God we may not have thought we needed or even wanted to believe in and find He hasn’t been so far away after all. As Augustine put it, "I found you not, O Lord, because I erred in seeking without that which was within.”

And even if we can only know and “see” Him in part now, in this life (1 Cor 13), we can begin to know and see this distant yet somehow strangely familiar relative Who’s been unfairly exiled from us.
 
Last edited:
The title says it all, this is a question I was asked by an atheist. “Why does God choose to communicate via a book, aka the Bible, why not speak to everyone himself?”
He didn’t “give us the Bible”, per se. The Church did. The words were inspired, but what God did give us was His Son, who came to earth, taught us, and then instructed His apostles to pass on His teaching.
 
God did give us the Bible. God is the author of every book as well as the human authors.

And that same God inspired the Church to revere what was written for us…

The NT did arise from Jesus sending his disciples to preach the Gospel, but they went on that mission only after they had received the Holy Spirit. That Holy Spirit inspired all preaching, but is also behind the distinctive acts of inspiration that created he books of the NT.

The book authored by God testifies to the Word of God who lived among us.

On the OP, God gave us the bible so that we could share the knowledge and experience of the Word of God. While that is shared orally, the written word takes us back to the underlying story to remind and refresh us. Without the written word, we would be too dependent on our on interpretations.
 
Last edited:
God did give us the Bible. God is the author of every book as well as the human authors.
Sure He is. But Jesus commanded the Apostles to teach. The Bible is one method they chose to convey that teaching.

The question the OP was asked presumes that the Bible is the only means – or the premiere method – of teaching the faith. It isn’t. It isn’t what Jesus commanded… and what He commanded is still being done! So, it’s not the case that God merely “gave us a book.” He didn’t. He gave His Son. And His Son’s teaching is still being spread to the world, in person!
 
Perhaps. In this case though, the OP is a Christian. Christians go to the Bible for answers to questions of faith (as well as the Church, other Believers, etc.) However, if this parable is not instructive in this case, please let me know why. Thanks - and…

Merry Christmas to all!
 
“Why does God choose to communicate via a book, aka the Bible, why not speak to everyone himself?”
God does both. The atheist who asked the question presupposes (wrongly) that God is forced to choose one or the other. He isn’t.
 
Last edited:
From the RCC:

"105 God is the author of Sacred Scripture. “The divinely revealed realities, which are contained and presented in the text of Sacred Scripture, have been written down under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.”

Perhaps we have a different idea of what “give us the Bible” means, but I would argue that if God is the author of Sacred Scripture, He did in fact give it to us.
 
Perhaps we have a different idea of what “give us the Bible” means, but I would argue that if God is the author of Sacred Scripture, He did in fact give it to us.
I’m not arguing against God’s divine authorship.

However, without the Church, the Bible wouldn’t have been compiled and distributed as such. Jesus gave us His Word, and commanded us to teach it. The Word is a Living Word, and it proceeds from Jesus, not from a book. The book is just a vessel. (It inerrantly conveys His Word, of course, but we revere the Word, not the vessel.)
 
God does both. The atheist who asked the question presupposes (wrongly) that God is forced to choose one or the other. He isn’t.
Well his exact point was that why give us a book that so many people have interpreted so differently through the centuries. When God could send Jesus to sit down on The Morning Show and communicate with us that way as well.
 
Well his exact point was that why give us a book that so many people have interpreted so differently through the centuries.
He gave us a Church first, who has the authority to interpret. He didn’t just drop a book from the heavens and say “have at it, guys.” Your friend, in a sense, is absolutely correct – it makes no sense that there would only be a book as a sole rule of faith and source of authority! And, of course… that’s not what God did…!
 
The question the OP was asked presumes that the Bible is the only means – or the premiere method – of teaching the faith. It isn’t. It isn’t what Jesus commanded… and what He commanded is still being done! So, it’s not the case that God merely “gave us a book.” He didn’t. He gave His Son. And His Son’s teaching is still being spread to the world, in person!
And the Spirit was sent by the Father to guide us into all truth. (and the Son…)

I do not disagree, but the action of the evangelists and the actions of the Church are not merely rooted in the Son. We have also been given God’s Holy Spirit, who is God just as the Son is.

And the Holy Spirit is still going out to the ends of the earth.

(really, I am not disagreeing with you. I hate when people use the word merely, as we both just did. There is always more.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top