N
newcatholic76
Guest
My question is really for a friend of mine in RCIA. I was married previously, but I’m not dating anyone so I don’t need an annulment before I get confirmed. My friend, however, is divorced and remarried. Both she and her current husband are in the process of getting annulments. She (and I) totally understand the necessity for a Decree of Nullity before one can be confirmed if one is living with a spouse from a second marriage. Clearly one cannot be in full communion with the Church in such a situation. But she is being told that she cannot be baptized until her Decree of Nullity is granted.
Why is she being denied baptism absent an annulment? It seems that she should be able to be baptized immediately (well, at the Easter Vigil) and wait to get confirmed once/if the annulment goes through.
Specifically, CCC 1233 states:
How can the Church deny baptism to anyone with right intention? Any light you can shed on this subject is most appreciated.
God bless!
Why is she being denied baptism absent an annulment? It seems that she should be able to be baptized immediately (well, at the Easter Vigil) and wait to get confirmed once/if the annulment goes through.
Specifically, CCC 1233 states:
CCC 1271 specifically allows for a person who is baptized and not yet in full communion with the Church when it quotes UR 3:… in the Roman rite it [baptism] is followed by years of catechesis before being completed later by Confirmation and the Eucharist, the summit of their Christian initiation.
CCC 1246 which states that “Every person not yet baptized and only such a person is able to be baptized.” (emphasis added)For men who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in some, though imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church.
How can the Church deny baptism to anyone with right intention? Any light you can shed on this subject is most appreciated.
God bless!