D
DL82
Guest
OK, this is a real mind-bender, I remember a few years ago when I used to help out with an Alpha course at my old church a science student came up with this one and stumped me:
God made the Universe so that we would love Him and one another.
Love requires free will.
Therefore, God had to give us free will in order to choose to love Him.
That’s the traditional formula, but…
Why did God make Love what it is? If He is truly all-powerful, couldn’t he simply have made the most valuable thing in the universe something else - something that didn’t require free will?
In other words, could God have said “Love is building tall stone pillars”, and then create a bunch of creatures who are programmed to build stone pillars all day long? We might think this is pointless, but if God is God, couldn’t He make such an activity supremely significant?
I suppose at the heart of this question is 1 John: God is Love. To answer this question, we need to answer the question, ‘Can God change His own nature?’
Most people would argue that God has to have the best possible nature, but this raises a further question, is the good good because God chooses it, or does God choose it because it is good? If the former is true, then the whole purpose of life rests on something that could have been otherwise (i.e. yes God could have chosen to make the universe for a different purpose, one not requiring free will, and that other purpose would have been equally as good as Love). If the latter is true, then who is the judge of goodness, who put goodness there before God?
OK, that’s the limit of my puny ability to wrestle with this odd question. Any other takers?
God made the Universe so that we would love Him and one another.
Love requires free will.
Therefore, God had to give us free will in order to choose to love Him.
That’s the traditional formula, but…
Why did God make Love what it is? If He is truly all-powerful, couldn’t he simply have made the most valuable thing in the universe something else - something that didn’t require free will?
In other words, could God have said “Love is building tall stone pillars”, and then create a bunch of creatures who are programmed to build stone pillars all day long? We might think this is pointless, but if God is God, couldn’t He make such an activity supremely significant?
I suppose at the heart of this question is 1 John: God is Love. To answer this question, we need to answer the question, ‘Can God change His own nature?’
Most people would argue that God has to have the best possible nature, but this raises a further question, is the good good because God chooses it, or does God choose it because it is good? If the former is true, then the whole purpose of life rests on something that could have been otherwise (i.e. yes God could have chosen to make the universe for a different purpose, one not requiring free will, and that other purpose would have been equally as good as Love). If the latter is true, then who is the judge of goodness, who put goodness there before God?
OK, that’s the limit of my puny ability to wrestle with this odd question. Any other takers?