S
St_Francis
Guest
This article briefly presents a goid argument that children whose parents divorce have a hard time with church–they go erratically and there is no stable foundation on or from which to construct understandings.
I agree. You can find a poll to give any result you want.I read another poll that suggests that the numbers of Catholics in the West are steady, not growing, remain the same.
You can find polls to paint any picture.
In other parts of the world, Catholicism and christians in general are growing very fast especially in China where millions are converting. Even under extreme oppression which forces them underground at times.
ft.com/cms/s/2/a6d2a690-6545-11e4-91b1-00144feabdc0.html
I think this is pretty accurate, at least from my own perspective as a child of divorced parents. I did grow up rarely going to church and when I did go it was either my paternal grandmother who took me ( but she lived a few hours away so I didn’t see her all the time) or I’d go with friends. I’m not aware of my parents, or my mother and stepfather ever going to church.Pargament (who has won major professional awards from both the American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association for the quality of his research) similarly argues that **the source of spiritual ambivalence is not a victory of reason over religion, but rather the result of the too-early failure of the ability of children to idealize parental figures. ** All children come to realize that their parents are imperfect at some point–that’s a normal and healthy part of growing up– but if this happens too early, the people who are primarily responsible for helping children make meaning out of their lives lose their credibility. When parents behave like children themselves, or get caught up in divorce drama, or post-divorce dating relationships, children often feel that they are left to sort things out for themselves. Children of divorce come to believe that they are the only ones who are qualified to find meaning, purpose and direction in their lives and they come to distrust any external source that wants to help them in this role (i.e., churches).
It seems that the “underdogs” are more likely to attract young people than are the long-established groups.I don’t think I really can agree with this, perhaps it may be true of an American context but over here in Ireland I think it’s far off the mark. We do still have a church attendance higher than most western countries but the overall population going to mass has nosedived.
Many Catholics who have left the church have married parents and themselves often don’t divorce as much as elsewhere when they do marry. I firmly believe it’s nothing to do with the setup of the home, and more how the Church itself behaves and what it actually teaches to an equal degree.
I think Christian denominations of all stripes need to stop blaming non-believers and wider society for people leaving and look deeper within. The early church found a continual supply of membership and faced far more trying conditions than we do, you’ve got to compete with gay couples wanting to get hitched, they had to deal with Roman emperors with God-complexes looking to chuck them to the lions.
Additionally, the first massive wave or departures were those who grew up in a time when divorce was still frowned upon and rare.Divorce is not a new innovation, the early church had no problem dealing with it. Classical culture was highly sexualized, the problem isn’t there today either. It’s inside, not outside.
In reference to op’s comment that many don’t know their faith. Blessed Bishop Sheen had a remark (not quoting verbatim)…“Ninety-five percent of non-Catholics don’t disagree with what the Church teaches, but disagree with what they THINK the Church teaches!” When speaking with fallen away Catholics…you often hear this ringing in your ears!
Very true, the Evangelical movements in the US and South America are picking up a lot of conservative minded former Catholics.It seems that the “underdogs” are more likely to attract young people than are the long-established groups.
Very true, and it’s still the case in some countries like Ireland, Argentina etc. Low church attendance, but also a low divorce rate.Additionally, the first massive wave or departures were those who grew up in a time when divorce was still frowned upon and rare.
Perhaps we have to redefine what a Catholic country is, like the proponents of same sex marriage have redefined marriage. Not much different than being Catholic by name, but rejecting all things Mother Church teaches. You can at least be assured that the SSM ceremonies will never be performed in the Church. That’s not the case with other Christians who’ll have to endure, and even be forced to conduct them.When a country that is majority Catholic votes for same sex marriage, I could see why some people would become dis-enamored with Catholicism. (see Ireland). I know the Church is against it, but who wants to attend Mass and other functions with people who do not believe what the Church teaches?