Why was it bad to build the Tower of Babel?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fakename
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

fakename

Guest
All I know about it seems to suggest that all the humans wanted was to build a tower to God -that doesn’t seem so obviously wrong (except for the fact that you can’t build a tower to heaven and you shouldn’t do unreasonable things).

So why destroy it? Was it a mortally sinful imprudence?
 
They didn’t build the tower to reach God, they built it wanting to be equal with God. Its pride.
 
They didn’t build the tower to reach God, they built it wanting to be equal with God. Its pride.
how-so? The Bible does state that they wanted to be “famous” so pride comes in, but it doesn’t say “equal with God”?
 
A belief that you can reach heaven outside the graces of God, on your own, is encompassed in the sin of pride.

“Pride is the excessive love of one’s own excellence. It is ordinarily accounted one of the seven capital sins. St. Thomas, however, endorsing the appreciation of St. Gregory, considers it the queen of all vices, and puts vainglory in its place as one of the deadly sins. In giving it this pre-eminence he takes it in a most formal and complete signification. He understands it to be that frame of mind in which a man, through the love of his own worth, aims to withdraw himself from subjection to Almighty God, and sets at naught the commands of superiors. It is a species of contempt of God and of those who bear his commission. Regarded in this way, it is of course mortal sin of a most heinous sort. Indeed St. Thomas rates it in this sense as one of the blackest of sins. By it the creature refuses to stay within his essential orbit; he turns his back upon God, not through weakness or ignorance, but solely because in his self-exaltation he is minded not to submit.” (Catholic Encyclopedia, 1917)
 
The Tower of Babel is the story of the tendency in each of us to try to build a better world without God. This secular world is where man reigns without God and attempts to do something great outside of God. There is an insatiable desire in man for self-glorification, for a world built on pride. We too struggle daily with the desire to Glorify ourselves, building a world outside the plan of God. The story in Genisis tells of the division, rivalry, and misunderstanding to which this leads. What can man produce without God? Like the tower of Babel, dreams built on false hopes eventually Collapse.
  • Source: ‘The Anawim Way’ - Liturgical Meditations for the Baptism of the Lord.
 
how-so? The Bible does state that they wanted to be “famous” so pride comes in, but it doesn’t say “equal with God”?
Humanity Wanted To Reach Heaven Outside Of The Way God Wanted Them To Reach Heaven. That Is A Form of Arrogance And Pride.🙂
 
In short I can’t see that the text implies that the people wanted to get themselves to heaven w/o God or w/o God’s plan, or to reject God, to reject His grace and go to heaven anyways, or to build a purely secular society. Unless somehow, the building of a tower to heaven implies rejection of God or His graces in some way. But in what way?
 
What was wrong was that the tower builders (the descendants of Noah’s son Ham) thought they could reach heaven their own way and not God’s way. They wanted to make a name for themselves and by themselves. They were rebelling against the covenant authority of Shem (Noah’s first born son). Shem in Hebrew means “name”. Names are important to God.
Code:
Ham's descendants decided they didn't need God or His covenant.    God had promised Noah never to send a flood again, so God instead confused their language.    This is Babylon and was probably a  ziggurat (pyramid with a temple on top that was built).    Babel or Babylon became the symbol of evil and decadence.
The enemies of the Israelites are the descendants of Ham. By building the tower, the Hamites, as they were called, were usurping the authority of Shem. It is Noah’s first-born Shem’s line that are the people of God and who chose to worship God as part of His covenant. This is the line that Jesus Christ comes from.
 
Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city and a tower with its top in the sky, and so make a name for ourselves; otherwise we shall be scattered all over the earth.”
 
I was just musing over this a couple weeks ago.

"let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. "

The motive is fame, yes. But there may be more to it than that. 'Let us make us a name lest we be scattered."

This seems to me to be a search for not only fame but earthly permanence, trying to make their material works last forever. It’s a search for permanence apart from God, apart from what is truly eternal.

The idea that it was an actual attempt to reach heaven – in the sense of physically climbing into heaven – does not seem original; it shows up in the first few centuries AD - long after Genesis. But the Bible itself does not seem to suggest this – it’s a monument, a symbol of power (fame). I think ‘heaven’ here just means ‘the sky’.
 
Yes. God wasn’t happy about it, and it was based on human pride. The tower of babel reminds me of the Burj Dubai a little.
 
Genesis 11:4 Then they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, with a tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may make a name for ourselves; otherwise we will be scattered over the face of the whole earth.

The highlight is the indication of pride by the people.
 
'Let us make us a name lest we be scattered."
Here, ‘a name’ means ‘a Shem’, which was equivalent to what Catholics understand as ‘a Pope’.
Shem was the first among his brothers, therefore the natural successor as the first among the leaders/fathers of humanity. A coup had happened a little earlier and humanity was in the midst of building a new social order. Now, they were trying to find a ‘Pope’ (which was really an anti-Pope) in order to stay united. It seems like Babel was being set up to be the capital of the ‘one’ world they were trying to make: One capital, one people, else, we will be scattered and end up with many capital cities…divided.

The God’s way was the natural family and trust from God no matter what. By this way, Noah was the father of humanity and therefore the natural (king). Naturally, he was to be replaced by his first born son (elder- to look over his little siblings, this order was always upheld among the people of God unless the elder was proved to be a coward in which case, the next in line in righteousness was chosen). Whatever happen, the one who was to be the elder for all human was to be a ‘first-born’ in righteousness. Obviously from the line of the first born. This is Shem and his descendants.
Shem also mean ‘Name’. The position of ‘first born’ meant also ‘priest’. And Shem being first of the fathers, he was for the whole humanity a ‘Pope’. He was the first among his brothers, meant to preside over them in love: primacy in love, (like the Pope in relation to other bishops and rest of Catholics.)

But people had been rebelling against God ever since Noah’s drunkenness, and its consequences on humanity. When, he scandalized his children and they took matters in their own hand (Can’t trust a drunkard). So Ham made a number of steps to take matters into his own hands. He installed his ‘first born son’ Canaan in the land of Shem (Salem) which was meant to be for the whole humanity what ‘Rome’ is to the Catholic Church. In the same inherited land of Shem, Nimrod (descendant of Shem) tried to make a ‘name’ (a Shem, a Pope) for the new ‘Church’ he was attempting to build.

Of course, this coup had not be recognized by Shem, nor Japhet (they had covered their father), but Noah, waking up too late, he could only curse (prophesy what was going to happen to) Canaan (son of Ham who had build a leadership behind his back). So they was still a ‘name’ (Shem) among descendant of Shem and Japhet. This caused the rebels to trying to make an other ‘name’ for themselves.

In religious terms, it is similar to what happen when there is scandal in the Church, and someone in attempt to repair, end up starting a denomination which will eventually be scattered into many denominations.

In secular terms, it is similar to building a United Nation to hold the world together in one accord (language), but this is really a distraction from human pride because God already made a United Nation which only can work, has worked, and will work: the Catholic Church.

Of course they failed. It is still from Shem that we have leadership in unity: belief in One God (monotheism) and also the new one humanity the Church.
 
They didn’t build the tower to reach God, they built it wanting to be equal with God. Its pride.
I agree!
Part of Jerome’s Commentary on this topic is:

"The evil is in their desire to “make a name” for themselves (cf. 12:2) rather than in the attempt to build a tower “with its top in the heavens” . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top