T
Techno2000
Guest
So, you believe Adam and Eve were born from soulless animal creatures ?I was referring to the six day creation story in general. The church allows for believing in evolution.
So, you believe Adam and Eve were born from soulless animal creatures ?I was referring to the six day creation story in general. The church allows for believing in evolution.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)I am simply making the point the Church allows for belief in theistic evolution. Why do you keep brining in Adam and Eve.
WHEN Jesus, after uttering a loud cry, expired, I saw his heavenly soul under the form of a bright meteor pierce the earth at the foot of the Cross, accompanied by the angel Gabriel and many other angels. His Divine nature continued united to his soul as well as to his body, which still remained hanging upon the Cross, but I cannot explain how this was, although I saw it plainly in my own mind. The place into which the soul of Jesus entered was divided into three parts, which appeared to me like three worlds; and I felt that they were round, and that each division was separated from the other by a hemisphere.The mystic Bl. Anne Catherine Emmerich
First, Anne Emmerich never wrote anything and secondly her alleged revelations are not approved by the Church as they are considered forgeries by Clemens Brentano who was a poet and interviewed her and allegedly wrote what she told him.The mystic Bl. Anne Catherine Emmerich allegedly had visions of the creation of Adam and eve, and Jesus’ soul entering into Abrahams bosom after his death delivering Adam and Eve along with all the just and the patriarchs there .
THE DOLOROUS PASSION OFTotus_tuus118:![]()
First, Anne Emmerich never wrote anything and secondly her alleged revelations are not approved by the Church as they are considered forgeries by Clemens Brentano who was a poet and interviewed her and allegedly wrote what she told him.The mystic Bl. Anne Catherine Emmerich allegedly had visions of the creation of Adam and eve, and Jesus’ soul entering into Abrahams bosom after his death delivering Adam and Eve along with all the just and the patriarchs there .
Nobody should put any store on these writings at all.
My dear friend that is not a Church approval!!THE DOLOROUS PASSION OF
OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST
NIHIL OBSTAT: GEORGIVS D. SMITH. D.D.
CENSOR DEPVTATVS
IMPRIMATUR: EDM. CAN. SVRMONT
VICARIVS GENERALIS
WESTMONASTERII, DIE XXI MAII MCMXXVIII
Only a few Jesus and Mary apparition have been officially “approved” by the Church. For the other million private revelations out there, one has to look for an NIHIL OBSTAT or IMPRIMATUR to know that it doesn’t go against Church teachings. That’s good enough for most people …except you.Techno2000:![]()
My dear friend that is not a Church approval!!THE DOLOROUS PASSION OF
OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST
NIHIL OBSTAT: GEORGIVS D. SMITH. D.D.
CENSOR DEPVTATVS
IMPRIMATUR: EDM. CAN. SVRMONT
VICARIVS GENERALIS
WESTMONASTERII, DIE XXI MAII MCMXXVIII
You obviously still misunderstand. Imprimatur and/or Nihil Obstat by a bishop (who often has not read books before giving that) is NOT a Church approval.Only a few Jesus and Mary apparition have been officially “approved” by the Church. For the other million private revelations out there, one has to look for an NIHIL OBSTAT or IMPRIMATUR to know that it doesn’t go against Church teachings. That’s good enough for most people …except you.
Pure speculation , anybody who has actually read her writing would recognize immediately that this didn’t come from the imagination Clemens Brentano.“In 1892, well after her death, her Cause for Beatification was introduced by the bishop of Münster. She subsequently attained to the title of Venerable, indicating Rome’s recognition that she lived a life of heroic virtue. However, in 1928 Rome suspended the Cause of Beatification when it was suspected that [Clemens] Brentano [her secretary] fabricated material attributed to her. The Holy See has since permitted the Cause to be re-opened on the sole issue of her life, without reference to the possibly doctored writings. On 2 July 2003 a decree of a miracle was promulgated by the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, opening the way for her Beatification ( L’Osservatore Romano N. 29, 16 July 2003, 2).”
Well the Church does not agree with you!Pure speculation , anybody who has actually read her writing would recognize immediately that this didn’t come from the imagination Clemens Brentano.
On 2 July 2003 a decree of a miracle was promulgated by the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, opening the way for her Beatification ( L’Osservatore Romano N. 29, 16 July 2003, 2).”On 2 July 2003 a decree of a miracle was promulgated by the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, opening the way for her Beatification ( L’Osservatore Romano N. 29, 16 July 2003, 2).”
The Holy See has since permitted the Cause to be re-opened on the sole issue of her life, without reference to the possibly doctored writings. On 2 July 2003 a decree of a miracle was promulgated by the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, opening the way for her Beatification ( L’Osservatore Romano N. 29, 16 July 2003, 2).”
Correct. That was my post but you are ignoring the part I highlighted.On 2 July 2003 a decree of a miracle was promulgated by the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints, opening the way for her Beatification ( L’Osservatore Romano N. 29, 16 July 2003, 2).”