Why would a black join the Masons but not the Catholic Church?

  • Thread starter Thread starter contramundum7
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

contramundum7

Guest
I met this black guy (young) who said he was going through the process of becoming a Mason. I asked him: “Why would u want to join an organization that has discriminated against your racial group for all of its history until recently?” I explained to him about the Black popes and how the Catholic Church has never been racist or excluded anyone (the popes have always spoken out against slavery, etc…). He didn’t have an answer, but didn’t act like he was going to stop pursuing his Masonic goals either…
Then in Selma, Alabama in the 1960s, several Protestant “churches” refused to integrate their churches even when the laws changed and they had to… Pretty pathetic… The Catholic Church never did exclude them. This one priest helped put a young Black through law school (etc…). Yet more Blacks - in America (?) are Baptist than Catholic (i THINK … Its that way in my world anyway…).
Anyway, i am just wondering if anyone has any specific infoto add to this… Thanks… 🙂
 
Like a multitude of people in general that join the free-mason’s they don’t know the truth behind it and see it as a way to advance somehow in their goals, whatever they maybe.

Members of the free-masons were the founders of the KKK, but I see many African-Americans driving around with mason emblems on their cars everyday. Go figure?
 
He probably joined for the social opportunities, I think that’s the main driving force for most. Probably the organization isn’t racist anymore. He might also want to make some important business contacts. That’s the reason that Jews and other minorities fought so hard to be accepted into clubs that previously excluded them. They were important means to make contacts with other influential people.
 
Like a multitude of people in general that join the free-mason’s they don’t know the truth behind it and see it as a way to advance somehow in their goals, whatever they maybe.

Members of the free-masons were the founders of the KKK, but I see many African-Americans driving around with mason emblems on their cars everyday. Go figure?
Wow - i didn’t know the M founded the KKK… where can i get more info about this? I know - the internet…:o
 
He probably joined for the social opportunities, I think that’s the main driving force for most. Probably the organization isn’t racist anymore. He might also want to make some important business contacts. That’s the reason that Jews and other minorities fought so hard to be accepted into clubs that previously excluded them. They were important means to make contacts with other influential people.
Yeah, that’s probably the reason… Who wants to join the RC Church & be persecuted 4 the rest of your life when u can join the Masons & become “rich”… and/or have prestige, etc…
But about the Ms not being racist anymore. If they were ever racist, they still are, if only here & there… certain members, etc…
Racism is probably here to stay - because of human nature. But at least things are MUCH better than they used to be… It takes time to grow up… :rolleyes:
 
I completely agree. I think it’s the weirdest thing. I also can’t understand for the life of me, why there are so many African Americans who are Democrats. Considering, that Democrats during the late 1800s, early 1900s didn’t even want them alive…oy vey…🤷

In Pax Christi
Andrew
 
Wow - i didn’t know the M founded the KKK… where can i get more info about this? I know - the internet…:o
There has been claims that Albert Pike was involved / leader of the KLAN in Arkansas, denied by the Mason’s, it is also claimed Nathan Bradford Forest one of its most public leader was a mason? Albert Pike for sure was a racist.

As to varifying this on the internet, goodluck. Most hits either get Mason sites that deny it and questionable conspiracy sites.

This information I truely cannot say where I first heard or read it.

But the Klan symbolisms and rituals are basic Masonary type symbolisms and rituals. Both are secret societies and very anti-Catholic.

One site you might check out is religion-cults.com/Secret/Ku-Klux-Klan/kkk.htm which is web site of Dr. J Dominguez (which I cannot claim to be reliable or orthodox but he has many writngs about Catholicism and her enemies) biblia.com/dominguez/
 
A similar question is “Why are most African-Americans Democrats when the Republicans freed the slaves?”
 
I completely agree. I think it’s the weirdest thing. I also can’t understand for the life of me, why there are so many African Americans who are Democrats. Considering, that Democrats during the late 1800s, early 1900s didn’t even want them alive…oy vey…🤷

In Pax Christi
Andrew
Yeah, really. And Abraham Lincoln was a Republican…
I doubt any of his opposition candidates would have considered doing anything for the Blacks, much less fight a war having to do with ending slavery…
Blacks are also more pro-life than Whites… So again, why are they voting Democrat???
:confused:
 
There has been claims that Albert Pike was involved / leader of the KLAN in Arkansas, denied by the Mason’s, it is also claimed Nathan Bradford Forest one of its most public leader was a mason? Albert Pike for sure was a racist.

As to varifying this on the internet, goodluck. Most hits either get Mason sites that deny it and questionable conspiracy sites.

This information I truely cannot say where I first heard or read it.

But the Klan symbolisms and rituals are basic Masonary type symbolisms and rituals. Both are secret societies and very anti-Catholic.

One site you might check out is religion-cults.com/Secret/Ku-Klux-Klan/kkk.htm which is web site of Dr. J Dominguez (which I cannot claim to be reliable or orthodox but he has many writngs about Catholicism and her enemies) biblia.com/dominguez/
Thank you so much for that info. I don’t know the Black i mentioned in the post - he was just someone i had a brief conversation with a year or so ago… But i hope i planted a seed in his mind about the Masons - and about how the Catholic Church has never been racist (though i’m sure some members have been, thorughout history… But then again, i’ve never really known many racist Catholics and even when/if a Catholic is racist, he/she probably would not condone discrimination against them, much less other, worse kinds of treatment…
 
Thank you so much for that info. I don’t know the Black i mentioned in the post - he was just someone i had a brief conversation with a year or so ago… But i hope i planted a seed in his mind about the Masons - and about how the Catholic Church has never been racist (though i’m sure some members have been, thorughout history… But then again, i’ve never really known many racist Catholics and even when/if a Catholic is racist, he/she probably would not condone discrimination against them, much less other, worse kinds of treatment…
Actually there have been and still are some racist Catholics in the US. I’m black/N. Amer/Irish and it is disturbing but not rare. It depends on where you live as to how overt the prejudice and/or discrimination is.

Historically in the US we have had our share of discrimination in the church. Blacks were not able to become priests or join religious orders as nuns for quite a long time. In Kentucky where my father’s family is from the religious orders just recently apologized for having allowed women to come to convents as nuns with personal slaves! See the article linked about some black nuns.

washtimes.com/metro/20060209-111124-6446r.htm

In the Jim Crow south in many places blacks in Catholic churches had to wait until all whites went to communion before they could go. This was in my parents’ lifetime, so many black Americans still think of our church in those terms. Fair or not it is often seen as a “white” church.

In contrast, the “masons” that your acquaintance was joining are likely the Prince Hall Masons which are all black in membership. They were formed when blacks could not join the other lodges. To be fair, all of the men that I know who joined are strong Christians who joined for the support network and business/social contacts that the masons provided. (Most still join for these reasons in my experience.) You have to remember that well into the 20th century blacks could not stay at most hotels or eat at restaurants while travelling, so we had to know someone along the way if taking a long trip, especially across the south.

My family was military and I can clearly remember having to pack all of our food and drive straight through for 24 hours (before all interstates were completed) to get home for holidays. We had to be careful even of trying to use public restrooms (supposedly after desegregation). I’m only 43 so this is not ancient history. I doubt this type of scenario even occurred to you when talking with this man because it is so far from your own life experience.

May I also note that you have referred to him not as a “man” but as “the Black” which I find a bit disturbing. It makes me think that race was the 1st and most important thing you saw rather than him as a person or a man. You may not have meant anything negative, but it comes across badly and could close a listener’s ears to anything else you had to say. I wonder if that is how you came across in conversation face to face?
 
Actually there have been and still are some racist Catholics in the US. I’m black/N. Amer/Irish and it is disturbing but not rare. It depends on where you live as to how overt the prejudice and/or discrimination is.

Historically in the US we have had our share of discrimination in the church. Blacks were not able to become priests or join religious orders as nuns for quite a long time. In Kentucky where my father’s family is from the religious orders just recently apologized for having allowed women to come to convents as nuns with personal slaves! See the article linked about some black nuns.

washtimes.com/metro/20060209-111124-6446r.htm
I think that last comment is very unfair! The only reason i mentioned he was Black was to make the point about racism.
Your comment proves another point to me: Blacks seem to scapegoat whites who are on their side for the sins of the ones who are NOT… I am sorry, but this has been MY reality. Maybe it is just self-destructiveness on their part… which stems from all the BS they’ve had to put up with… I don’t know. But i don’t appreciate it. I wasn’t there (in the slave days) and i didn’t do anything racist. So don’t take your anger out on me and others who would have, if given the chance, fought alongside MLK and others for equal rights for Blacks and ALL citizens.
I have other things to say, but those things kind of went out the window with your last comment…
I would apologize for racist Whites but why should I? I didn’t and would not do what they have done… Even so, i empathize…

In the Jim Crow south in many places blacks in Catholic churches had to wait until all whites went to communion before they could go. This was in my parents’ lifetime, so many black Americans still think of our church in those terms. Fair or not it is often seen as a “white” church.

In contrast, the “masons” that your acquaintance was joining are likely the Prince Hall Masons which are all black in membership. They were formed when blacks could not join the other lodges. To be fair, all of the men that I know who joined are strong Christians who joined for the support network and business/social contacts that the masons provided. (Most still join for these reasons in my experience.) You have to remember that well into the 20th century blacks could not stay at most hotels or eat at restaurants while travelling, so we had to know someone along the way if taking a long trip, especially across the south.

My family was military and I can clearly remember having to pack all of our food and drive straight through for 24 hours (before all interstates were completed) to get home for holidays. We had to be careful even of trying to use public restrooms (supposedly after desegregation). I’m only 43 so this is not ancient history. I doubt this type of scenario even occurred to you when talking with this man because it is so far from your own life experience.

May I also note that you have referred to him not as a “man” but as “the Black” which I find a bit disturbing. It makes me think that race was the 1st and most important thing you saw rather than him as a person or a man. You may not have meant anything negative, but it comes across badly and could close a listener’s ears to anything else you had to say. I wonder if that is how you came across in conversation face to face?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top