K
kev7
Guest
I was watching the news tonight and found out that there is a group of women who are calling themselves priests.
When they interviewed the women they didn’t seem that happy. In fact they all had a very sour look about them. It just didn’t seem right that a person who has God in their heart would act and sound so bitter.
After I thought about this I realized that it is quite disturbing.
Don’t these women realize that they will never be happy trying to play the role that God has given to men? Why don’t they just accept that God created men and women to be different and have different roles in life? These are women who are unhappy with how God has created them. They are unhappy being women in the first place. And that is why they are so bitter. They are mad and upset with God and his creation. They have been told to be unhappy by Satan himself.
If God wanted us to be the same he wouldn’t of made the two sexes. It is clear to me that this is not a women’s issue at all. Being a priest is not a career. I think that women are blessed that they do not have to even consider being a priest. Christ did not ask women to take up his cross because women already have a burden. They have the gift of life and the all the responsibilities that go with it.
I think the main problem here is that they have been influenced by feminist doctrine. A doctrine that tells first tells women they are considered inferior to men and then tells them to be competitive with men. Women are also told that being a nurturer and a life giver is an inferior role and is akin to slavery. It is clear to me that any woman who listens to this has fallen prey to the empty promises of Satan.
On the contrary, the church teaches that men and women play a complimentary role in life. Men are built to be providers and protectors and have all the mental and physical properties required to fulfill that end. Women are built to be givers of life and have all the physical and mental faculties to nurture the life that God gives them.
The answer then is very simple. A priest is a natural provider and a protector. He provides faith and protects the word of God. In my mind, this is a role that is best suited to a man.
On the other hand, God has given the gift of life to women. It would be wrong to ask a woman to give up that gift. I don’t think that Jesus would tell a woman that she should give up her natural instincts as a giver of life and a nurturer to be a provider and a protector. No, Christ would look upon a woman and feel compassion for her. He would forgive her for any transgression and would never place a load on her back.
Jesus was a man, and as a man I can understand why it is not right to place a heavy load on a woman’s back. I would never do such a thing. In fact I would carry any load she had myself. I would be man just a Jesus was. It is therefore very clear to me that Christ is a gentleman of high regard when he refuses to let a woman be a priest and let her carry his cross.
“No… let me carry that for you”, is what Christ would say to you women who want to be priests.
When they interviewed the women they didn’t seem that happy. In fact they all had a very sour look about them. It just didn’t seem right that a person who has God in their heart would act and sound so bitter.
After I thought about this I realized that it is quite disturbing.
Don’t these women realize that they will never be happy trying to play the role that God has given to men? Why don’t they just accept that God created men and women to be different and have different roles in life? These are women who are unhappy with how God has created them. They are unhappy being women in the first place. And that is why they are so bitter. They are mad and upset with God and his creation. They have been told to be unhappy by Satan himself.
If God wanted us to be the same he wouldn’t of made the two sexes. It is clear to me that this is not a women’s issue at all. Being a priest is not a career. I think that women are blessed that they do not have to even consider being a priest. Christ did not ask women to take up his cross because women already have a burden. They have the gift of life and the all the responsibilities that go with it.
I think the main problem here is that they have been influenced by feminist doctrine. A doctrine that tells first tells women they are considered inferior to men and then tells them to be competitive with men. Women are also told that being a nurturer and a life giver is an inferior role and is akin to slavery. It is clear to me that any woman who listens to this has fallen prey to the empty promises of Satan.
On the contrary, the church teaches that men and women play a complimentary role in life. Men are built to be providers and protectors and have all the mental and physical properties required to fulfill that end. Women are built to be givers of life and have all the physical and mental faculties to nurture the life that God gives them.
The answer then is very simple. A priest is a natural provider and a protector. He provides faith and protects the word of God. In my mind, this is a role that is best suited to a man.
On the other hand, God has given the gift of life to women. It would be wrong to ask a woman to give up that gift. I don’t think that Jesus would tell a woman that she should give up her natural instincts as a giver of life and a nurturer to be a provider and a protector. No, Christ would look upon a woman and feel compassion for her. He would forgive her for any transgression and would never place a load on her back.
Jesus was a man, and as a man I can understand why it is not right to place a heavy load on a woman’s back. I would never do such a thing. In fact I would carry any load she had myself. I would be man just a Jesus was. It is therefore very clear to me that Christ is a gentleman of high regard when he refuses to let a woman be a priest and let her carry his cross.
“No… let me carry that for you”, is what Christ would say to you women who want to be priests.
