1 Cor. 11:29 - Where's the Blood?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Montgomeryatty
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Montgomeryatty

Guest
I was reading my NIV Study Bible last night, and looking at the Scriptural evidence for the Eucharist. Was looking to see what the Protestant editors had to say about the text. I must admit they raised an interesting point. 1 Cor. 11:29 says that “anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself.”

The NIV editors said that the larger passage concerning the Lord’s Supper could be referring to Christ’s actual body and blood per the Catholic teaching. But, they asked, if so, where is the Blood? That is, the verse begins by noting that a person eats and drinks, but then it says that they incur judgment if they fail to recognize the Body, but on the face of the text, nothing explicit happens to anyone for failing to recognize the Blood of the Lord.

I expect that there is a valid reason for this apparent omission, but some thoughts would be welcomed. Thanks
 
I was reading my NIV Study Bible last night, and looking at the Scriptural evidence for the Eucharist. Was looking to see what the Protestant editors had to say about the text. I must admit they raised an interesting point. 1 Cor. 11:29 says that “anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself.”

The NIV editors said that the larger passage concerning the Lord’s Supper could be referring to Christ’s actual body and blood per the Catholic teaching. But, they asked, if so, where is the Blood? That is, the verse begins by noting that a person eats and drinks, but then it says that they incur judgment if they fail to recognize the Body, but on the face of the text, nothing explicit happens to anyone for failing to recognize the Blood of the Lord.

I expect that there is a valid reason for this apparent omission, but some thoughts would be welcomed. Thanks
I would imagine that since the blodd is contained in the body itself by recognizing the Body we are implicitly recognizing the Blood as well.

One of the big problems with Protestants is that they rely almost entirely on strict literal interpretations of scripture usually in todays terms. They tend to ignore the historical connotation that scripture was written in and what things were actually being referred to. If you look at Scripture in that fashion you can end up with literally millions of different possibilities of interpretations, as evidenced by the thousands of Protestant denominations that exist today, all with slightly different, or in some cases significant differences in interpretation of certain passages.

Don’t fall into that trap, please.
 
I was reading my NIV Study Bible last night, and looking at the Scriptural evidence for the Eucharist. Was looking to see what the Protestant editors had to say about the text. I must admit they raised an interesting point. 1 Cor. 11:29 says that “anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself.”

The NIV editors said that the larger passage concerning the Lord’s Supper could be referring to Christ’s actual body and blood per the Catholic teaching. But, they asked, if so, where is the Blood? That is, the verse begins by noting that a person eats and drinks, but then it says that they incur judgment if they fail to recognize the Body, but on the face of the text, nothing explicit happens to anyone for failing to recognize the Blood of the Lord.

I expect that there is a valid reason for this apparent omission, but some thoughts would be welcomed. Thanks
Perhaps someone with knowledge of the Greek will suggest a reason why Paul doesn’t explicitly mention the Blood of Christ.

But to me it’s pretty obvious from the context that passages 27, 28, and 29 should be considered together. I’d say we are to understand that we need to recognize the Christ’s Blood - his life - along with his Body. (And of course as Catholics we believe that both Body and Blood are present under each species anyways; but I don’t know that this passage is intending to say so.)

Don’t be surprised if this is moved to the Scripture subforum.
 
I’ve got an NIV Bible myself, and if you look back a couple of verses (27) it says:

Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body AND blood of the Lord."
 
I’ve got an NIV Bible myself, and if you look back a couple of verses (27) it says:

Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body AND blood of the Lord."
Here’s 1 Corinthians 11:27 from a number of different translations.
1Co 11:27

(ASV) Wherefore whosoever shall eat the bread or drink the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner, shall be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord.

(CEV) But if you eat the bread and drink the wine in a way that isn’t worthy of the Lord, you sin against his body and blood.

(DRB) Therefore, whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord.

(ESV) Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord.

(KJV) Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.

(MKJV) So that whoever shall eat this bread and drink this cup of the Lord unworthily, he will be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.

(MSG) Anyone who eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Master irreverently is like part of the crowd that jeered and spit on him at his death. Is that the kind of “remembrance” you want to be part of?

(NAS77) Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner, shall be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord.

(NASB) Therefore whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner, shall be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord.

(RV) Wherefore whosoever shall eat the bread or drink the cup of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord.
 
I was reading my NIV Study Bible last night, and looking at the Scriptural evidence for the Eucharist. Was looking to see what the Protestant editors had to say about the text. I must admit they raised an interesting point. 1 Cor. 11:29 says that “anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself.”

The NIV editors said that the larger passage concerning the Lord’s Supper could be referring to Christ’s actual body and blood per the Catholic teaching. But, they asked, if so, where is the Blood? That is, the verse begins by noting that a person eats and drinks, but then it says that they incur judgment if they fail to recognize the Body, but on the face of the text, nothing explicit happens to anyone for failing to recognize the Blood of the Lord.

I expect that there is a valid reason for this apparent omission, but some thoughts would be welcomed. Thanks
Montgomery:

As you will see by reading the other brothers and sisters here, the commentators are probably guilty of taking that one verse out of context.

When St Paul sent these letters, they were read section by section, not verse by verse, so the worshippers the letters were intended for would have heard the whole thing.

1 Corinthians 11:23-32 NIV

*For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, “This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way, after supper he took the cup, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me.” For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes.

Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. A man ought to examine himself before he eats of the bread and drinks of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself. That is why many among you are weak and sick, and a number of you have fallen asleep. But if we judged ourselves, we would not come under judgment. When we are judged by the Lord, we are being disciplined so that we will not be condemned with the world.*

1 Corinthians 11:23-32 The Message

*Let me go over with you again exactly what goes on in the Lord’s Supper and why it is so centrally important. I received my instructions from the Master himself and passed them on to you. The Master, Jesus, on the night of his betrayal, took bread. Having given thanks, he broke it and said, *

This is my body, broken for you.
Do this to remember me.
After supper, he did the same thing with the cup:
This cup is my blood, my new covenant with you.
Each time you drink this cup, remember me.
What you must solemnly realize is that every time you eat this bread and every time you drink this cup, you reenact in your words and actions the death of the Master. You will be drawn back to this meal again and again until the Master returns. You must never let familiarity breed contempt.

Anyone who eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Master irreverently is like part of the crowd that jeered and spit on him at his death. Is that the kind of “remembrance” you want to be part of? Examine your motives, test your heart, come to this meal in holy awe.

If you give no thought (or worse, don’t care) about the broken body of the Master when you eat and drink, you’re running the risk of serious consequences. That’s why so many of you even now are listless and sick, and others have gone to an early grave. If we get this straight now, we won’t have to be straightened out later on. Better to be confronted by the Master now than to face a fiery confrontation later.


I hope that this, along with the rest that has been written by the other brothers and sisters.

Your Brother in Christ, Michael
 
I The NIV editors said that the larger passage concerning the Lord’s Supper could be referring to Christ’s actual body and blood per the Catholic teaching. But, they asked, if so, where is the Blood?
the obvious answer is that Catholic teaching holds that under either species the entire Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ is present. One wonders, however, if this verse presents a problem to Protestant theology, why so many of their hymns rely on the imagery of salvation through the Blood of the Lord.

Nothing but the Blood of Jesus
Washed in the Blood of the Lamb
 
the obvious answer is that Catholic teaching holds that under either species the entire Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ is present. One wonders, however, if this verse presents a problem to Protestant theology, why so many of their hymns rely on the imagery of salvation through the Blood of the Lord.

Nothing but the Blood of Jesus
Washed in the Blood of the Lamb
I think those hymns are based on Revelation 7:14. Rev 7:14 NAS77) And I said to him, “My lord, you know.” And he said to me, "These are the ones who come out of the great tribulation, and they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.
 
I think those hymns are based on Revelation 7:14. Rev 7:14 NAS77) And I said to him, “My lord, you know.” And he said to me, "These are the ones who come out of the great tribulation, and they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.
and what Blood do they think that refers to? I find it hard to believe that any Protestent denomination that retains a ritual of the Lord’s Supper makes of it an empty vain repetition devised by man by denying that the Body and Blood are at least symbolised, by the bread and wine, even if they do not confess the Real Presence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top