Tis_Bearself
Patron
This is true, but the kind of thoughtful person who enters the Church by this path has less need of an evangelization program, and your average person from a parish is not equipped to provide it unless they too are a convert from a similar background, nor should they all need to be equipped to provide it. Edith Stein’s conversion was heavily influenced by people who, like her, studied and taught philosophy. I am sure your average Catholic in a parish in her day was not on that level, and it is not necessary for them all to be on that level; there are different types of faith experience, and people at the kindly coffee-and-donuts level will be evangelizing to a different group who are more interested in the personal experience and less interested in Truth and Theology.But there are a lot of never-Catholics like Scott Hahn, Peter Kreeft, Edith Stein, Dale Alquist, and so many others who read their way into the Church. If you made a list of the strongest apologists and evangelists today, half would be converts.
Edith also had great ability to seek out necessary sources to help her in her quest for truth. Today we have the Internet so people can find sources there, and find people to discuss theology and answer complex questions on sites like CAF.
I’m not saying it’s bad for people to be knowledgeable about their faith, and likely many average Catholics could use a little more catechesis, but at the same time, we don’t all need to be Thomistic scholars in order to evangelize. The appeal of saints like Therese and Faustina is that they communicated their teachings simply and accessibly. Many people can understand and connect with their writings, and often people are looking for that type of human connection, not a big “search for truth”. There’s a place for the philosophy and the search for truth also, but it’s a niche market.