They always tells that bible is forged by christians, but they fails to provide who forged it, when it is forged, which book/chapter/verse is forged, where it is forged. Also if any correction made by christians is acceptable to jews?. If so , then definitly OT of Christians should be different from Jews. But books which are commonly using by jews and christians are same.
If any change made by Roman catholic church is acceptable to orthodox or protestant and vice versa.?.
But in history that true that Caliph Uthman ordered destruction of existing versions of quran and introduced a new one , claiming that existing versions are manipulated. What quran exsisting now is originated at the time of Caliph Uthman. Hadis also mentions this.
This is true, and there still exists ONE copy of the Qur’an which currently sits in a Turkish museum, which the authorities REFUSE to allow to be studied. From the existing evidence, it seems that the text isn’t the ‘authorized’ version and Islamic scholars are fearful that the new text may turn people away from Islam or corrupt their beliefs.
Muslims answers this as , there exsisted different dialectics of Quran and this difference occured among those who byhearted and recited …in the passage of time difference occured. So in order to getting uniformity, caliph destroyed those versions which is deviated from original verses.
Indeed, you could go to any genizah (a special cemetery for sacred texts) to see the respect accorded to Torah scrolls.
And in Christianity, holy books and texts were rare, expensive to produce and were afforded a lot of care and respect as a result. Look at the Lindisfarne Gospels- they’re bound in gold and metal, covered in elaborate detailed calligraphy and drawings, and the text itself is a work of art. This and texts like it weren’t made to be thrown away or destroyed.