OK for serious discussion I’ll play.
Essentially you’re right (about God converting people). My point was, as clumsy as it was, was that chastising an active gay person (I will clarify, I thought it was assumed that we’re talking sexually-active gays, not gays leading a chaste life), or taking them to a Mass sung in Gregorian chant, have about an equal chance of converting that person, which is approximately zero . But at least the Mass in Gregorian chant won’t do any harm, whereas chastising the person you’re trying to dialogue with may drive him/her away…
(Re: “I’ll play” ) : Okay OraLabora. I’m willing to give it (serious discussion) a try,
solely with you - Let’s see how far we get …:yup:
Regarding the section quoted above :To bring it up to speed. There has been so much empty arguing going on since you posted this comment , and far too often for my liking those arguments remain in the abstract (arguments of the thread in general - not your arguments). For such a serious subject, the abstract doesn’t present us with a whole lot that is directly useful in pertinent practicality. Furthermore the abstract is often used to promote (commonly indirect) arguments which can’t be answered – because they aren’t specific. When used in this manner, as you can judge from this thread alone, the abstract promotes a sense of ambiguity…which leads to confusion
I don’t know if you’ve ever had the opportunity to read one of the biographies written about St. André Bessette (Frère André/Brother André) entitled
Brother Andre: The Wonder Man of Mount Royal by Henri-Paul Bergeron,. Some of the accounts of the people who came to him for counsel recorded in that book are real eye-openers… He was known to be brusque with some of the pilgrims, particularly incredulous or immodest ones - but not only these ; by his own admission, he was “impatient”. However it didn’t stop from God working through him… didn’t even slow God down. His biography states that miracles were a daily occurrence when the sick and afflicted went to St. Joseph’s Oratory to consult Brother André. The only time there weren’t any miracles was when the curious showed up.
One story recounted (I’m paraphrasing – book isn’t in front of me at the moment) in the biography is of a man, who was supposed to have a leg amputated and had gone to consult St. André. The good Brother recommended to the man that instead of having his leg amputated, he could make a novena to St. Joseph, beginning with Confession and reception of Holy Communion at Mass . The man agreed and complied. However he came back on the eighth day of his novena to tell Brother André that he was packing it in. He said he was giving up because he hadn’t been healed by the eighth day, and was met with the retort from Brother André, “ Very well, shall I call up the surgeon for you?” , which directly caused the man to leave the office in a state of serious discontent. But even after leaving the office so upset , the man still came back, was still willing to begin another novena and, it is implied, that this man received his cure.
Even if you haven’t had or don’t get a chance to read the biography of Brother André , please consider what you yourself have said. These are your own words :
I also know though, that moralizing didn’t work with me. In the end it was the realization of my own brokenness that brought me to God.
You ended up realizing your “own brokenness” , despite whatever “moralizing” (which you claim didn’t work took place) . That’s God – working despite our human weakness – human weakness on the part of all parties involved (but emphasis on “moralizers” here

).
Everyone else who is trying to order us how we must speak has (very conveniently) left out that part – that, even if someone is spoken to in a brusque manner or turned away, or whatever], whatever the person’s reaction may be, there’s still every chance God will effect a conversion in that person anyway – as was your case. (conversion , in the sense of a
turning , since each of our conversions is actually a life-long process ) So to me, people are presenting an unbalanced argument. If they only say the first part :
… have about an equal chance of converting that person, which is approximately zero.
- Without adding that God also works with broken tools to create his masterpieces and nothing can stop something if it is His will – specifically in this case, human weakness , then we aren’t telling the whole story ; ergo not telling the true story. I further believe that the chance of the person getting converted in these (what shall we call them - “negative scenarios”?) is not zero - far from it. Look at the story taken from Brother André’s biography. If we truly consider how God works - He can take a misunderstanding and use it to everyone’s advantage. I think a lot of people on this thread are selling God short.
I recall that they were saying that same thing about St. Paul , that he couldn’t be converted– even after his conversion – and they were even saying it to God . This is where I believe all this accusatory agglomeration about driving people away does a disservice to God . People are implying that we must speak a certain way , or we are going to disable God – we are going to somehow limit his saving power . :dts: