Unborn children do not have the right to sue or be sued (at least anywhere I know of) in the same way that others, including those in comas can.
Born children do not have the right to sue either Any lawsuit is brought by the parent or guardian on behalf of the child. Courts are generally reluctant to even allow a child to testify in a case - theirs or someone else’s.
Unborn children do not acquire citizenship rights before birth.
You might explore the issue of citizenship, both in the US and elsewhere. Your comment is not necessarily correct., as it can depend on a number of circumstances.
I know there are physical impediments to baptism in this case, but my point is that the Church, in deciding on the form this sacrament would take, excluded one group of ‘human beings’. This indicates a lack of full agreement with the proposition that a pre-viable unborn child is fully human.
either you understand that baptism requires (at least) pouring water over the head while pronouncing the words of baptism, or you have some really strange ideas about what it means to have a lack of full agreement with the proposition that a pre-viable unborn child is fully human. The impossibility of baptizing the child has no - zero, nada - bearing on your proposition.
Naming generally takes place only after birth
Do you have any children? I have yet, in 74 years, to meet anyone who had not already picked out names for their child (or children, in multiple birth instances) and with modern technology, many if not most parents are aware of the sex of their child and so pick one name.
There is no Church tradition of requium masses for unborn children.
There were no requiem Masses before for anyone born who was not a Catholic. So what?
There is no Church requirement to treat the bodies of unborn children who die, from whatever reason, as bodies of other humans are required to be treated. This is especially so the earlier an abortion occurs.
Given the stance of the Church on the use of fetal tissues in experiments and vaccine development, you might want to read a bit more widely.
Your number 8 almost appears to be facetious. Most miscarriages’ are a very private matter for the family, not something broadcast about. Have you ever spoken with “pro-lifers” about it sufficient to have had a valid survey? And given that most miscarriages are not preventable, your comment is specious - and likely insulting to anyone who has suffered a miscarriage.
9 - and your point is? Your presumption that this indicates that the child is not accepted as fully human is specious.
10 And Easter is far more important a feast day than Christmas. So? If Mary had miscarried, likely it would have never been known outside of her village, if even there.
