C
ckempston
Guest
I did. Thanks.I answered this above, you might have missed it:
I did. Thanks.I answered this above, you might have missed it:
Not really. I’m guessing the number of infant baptisms closely parallels the number of infants.The article stated that infant baptism was not included in that number. This article is strictly about people converting. But I would guess that if whole families were converting to Catholicism this Easter Vigil, that there would possibly be infants being baptised also?
Are you wanting to know how many infant baptism’s there are in a given year in the church?
Even in a family of converts, I don’t believe the infant would be baptized at the Easter Vigil. I’m doing some research.The article stated that infant baptism was not included in that number. This article is strictly about people converting. But I would guess that if whole families were converting to Catholicism this Easter Vigil, that there would possibly be infants being baptised also?
Let us know what you find. I was just taking a guess that there would be some infants involved too. Thank you.Even in a family of converts, I don’t believe the infant would be baptized at the Easter Vigil. I’m doing some research.
Thank you!yes if an entire family is entering the Church at the Easter Vigil, any infants (children under age 7) will be baptized at the same time. They will not be confirmed and receive first communion however, but will be catechized and celebrate at the age set in their diocese for the Catholic peers.
I could have sworn you were Eastern Catholic a few years back. I’m probably thinking of someone else.yes if an entire family is entering the Church at the Easter Vigil, any infants (children under age 7) will be baptized at the same time. They will not be confirmed and receive first communion however, but will be catechized and celebrate at the age set in their diocese for the Catholic peers.
Ah … I was a little confused until you said that. Thank you for clarifying.And, if that 150,000 is only counting the US
I’m guessing that you meant to say “0.3%”? (You’re not claiming that there are only 5 millions US Catholics, are you?it’s more like a 3% increase in American Catholics, not .001%.
I think it might be a more accurate count of faithful, practicing, non-cafeteria Catholics, yes.I’m guessing that you meant to say “0.3%”? (You’re not claiming that there are only 5 millions US Catholics, are you?)
ckempston, give it a break, accept it and move on.Considering the size of the Catholic church, that number is somewhat of a joke, statistically speaking. Indeed, heaven rejoices over one sinner that repents, but that would be an impressive figure for a church with less than a million members. That would be approximately 15%, and considering most “conversions” happen at Easter in Catholicism, well, honestly, is this really supposed to be impressive? A church that boasts 1.5 billion members growing by .001%? Wow. That means that 99.999% of members are ineffectual in their outreach.
Seems to be a mix of unbaptized individuals and those changing their affiliation.Given the scandals that have rocked the church in recent years this seems to be a massive number of converts. I would like figures of the type of churches that they are coming from. Is it mainline protestants or the mega church types that have got bored with the glitz and show biz?
Why would I do a thing like that? The topic invites a lot of criticism. Besides the fact that Catholics “save up” conversions for Easter, as if one day is better than any other to be baptized, the information was in need of clarification. As someone who comes from a movement with a very performance/numbers focused background, I’m naturally skeptical when someone starts throwing around big numbers as evidence of how great things are going.ckempston, give it a break, accept it and move on.
It is even more impressive given that it is not merely a matter of signing up.Given the scandals that have rocked the church in recent years this seems to be a massive number of converts. I would like figures of the type of churches that they are coming from. Is it mainline protestants or the mega church types that have got bored with the glitz and show biz?
Why in the world would this topic invite a lot of criticism? Maybe from you? These people are converting on their own free will, that they know and found out about the Catholic church in which Christ established. Something is pulling them toward the church and that something is truth.Why would I do a thing like that? The topic invites a lot of criticism. Besides the fact that Catholics “save up” conversions for Easter, as if one day is better than any other to be baptized, the information was in need of clarification. As someone who comes from a movement with a very performance/numbers focused background, I’m naturally skeptical when someone starts throwing around big numbers as evidence of how great things are going.
Including Newt Gingrich!Seems to be a mix of unbaptized individuals and those changing their affiliation.
I gave you a reason in my reply: Catholics “save up” conversions for Easter. How long did conversions take in the Bible?Why in the world would this topic invite a lot of criticism? Maybe from you? These people are converting on their own free will, that they know and found out about the Catholic church in which Christ established. Something is pulling them toward the church and that something is truth.
Although people try to avoid the hard and doctrinal and moral truths the CC offers them because **hard truths demand that lives be changed. **
When they contemplate the history of the Catholic church and the lives of the saints, they realize there must be something special, maybe something supernatural, about an institution that can produce people such as At. Augustine, St. Thomas Aquinas, and Mother Teresa.
I wonder if Newt will be Baptized since Baptists don’t practice valid baptism according to Catholicism?Including Newt Gingrich!
Conservative author and former House speaker Newt Gingrich will
celebrate the Easter season this year in a very special way – by
converting to Roman Catholicism.
“I have become increasingly drawn to Catholicism over the past
several years while attending Mass with my wife, Callista,” Gingrich
tells Newsmax. “ After prayer and reflection, I believe this is where
God has led me. I’m looking forward with great joy to being received
into full communion with the Catholic Church.”
Rumors of the religious conversion began circulating last month
when Gingrich, a Baptist since college, told The New York Times that he
had been exploring a reaffirmation of the role of religion in public
life and found himself increasingly attracted to his wife’s Roman
Catholic faith.
Don’t believe everything you read, ckempston. The Catholic Church has never made a blanket statement that Baptists are not validly baptized.I wonder if Newt will be Baptized since Baptists don’t practice valid baptism according to Catholicism?