1901 American Standard Version

  • Thread starter Thread starter Omyo12
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
O

Omyo12

Guest
The 1901 American Standard Version is the American edition of the “Revised Version” which was a revision of the “Authorized Version” (King James Version).

The Revised Standard Version and the New American Standard Bible are revisions of the ASV.

I’m wondering what people think of this translation?

I know it lacks the Deuterocanon, but one could just refer to the Douay-Rheims (which is written in the same archaic style)

I’ve been debating for a while now whether or not to get a RSV-CE which is a little archaic when referring to God. The RSV-2CE eliminates most of it except for the Lord’s Prayer.

However, there are little things that have bugged me about the RSV-CE. Much to my surprise, these problems are not in the ASV.

Here’s what I found interesting (comparing it to the RSV-CE):

Genesis 12:3 (RSV) “…and by you all the families of the earth shall bless themselves.”
Genesis 12:3 (ASV) “…and in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed.”

Genesis 9:20 (RSV) “Noah was the first tiller of the soil. He planted a vineyard”
Genesis 9:20 (ASV) “And Noah began to be a husbandman, and planted a vineyard:”

Psalm 45:6 (RSV) “Your divine throne endures for ever and ever.”
Psalm 45:6 (ASV) "Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: "

Psalm 139:14 (RSV) “…for thou art fearful and wonderful…”
Psalm 139:14 (ASV) “…for I am fearfully and wonderfully made…”

**Isaiah 7:14 (RSV) “…young woman…”
Isaiah 7:14 (ASV) “…virgin…”
**
Matthew 19:5 (RSV)
“…one”
Matthew 19:5 (ASV) “…one flesh”

Matthew 20:15 (RSV) “…Or do you begrudge my generosity?”
Matthew 20:15 (ASV) “… or is thine eye evil, because I am good?”

Hebrews 2:10 (RSV) “…should make the pioneer of their salvation perfect through suffering.”
Hebrews 2:10 (ASV) “…to make the author of their salvation perfect through sufferings.”

The ASV is also consistent in translating ῥαββί as “Rabbi.”
For some strange reason, the RSV translators decided to change it to “Master” in the Gospel of Mark and kept it “Rabbi” elsewhere 🤷

I’ve also looked at other critical verses: John 1:1; 2 Thessalonians 2:15; 1 Timothy 3:1,15; Titus 1:6; James 5:16; and they all checked out 👍

Not surprising, Luke 1:28 reads “Hail, thou that art highly favored, the Lord is with thee.”
but even Catholic Bibles – JB, NJB, NAB – also translate it such 🤷

Of course it also reads “Verily” instead of “Amen” and “Hallelujah” instead of “Alleluia”

It has other problems:
One is the archaic language. The RSV-CE retains some but only when talking to God. The ASV goes King James style. For example Luke 18:16 “…Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not…”
However the Douay-Rheims is also archaic and I really don’t mind

It renders יהוה as “Jehovah” instead of the traditional “LORD.”
Being translated from the Hebrew, I also don’t mind. I know “Jehovah” is probably from combining YHWH with the Hebrew vowels from Adonai. But, like the Jews, when I see “Jehovah” I’ll think “Lord” 👍

The textual basis is outdated and it was published before the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered. Then again, so was the RSV, mostly.

The biggest problem with the ASV is of course the fact it is not an approved Catholic Bible and lacks the Deuterocanon.
I don’t think it ever could have been approved since it was published in 1901 and the Divino Afflante Spiritu was issued in 1943. The first approved Protestant Bible was an edited version of the RSV in 1966. The NRSV wasn’t even edited to be approved! (kinda, the NRSV-CE was a little edited for the Canadian lectionary)
 
I like the ASV’s NT because it uses Westcott-Hort Greek instead of the Received Text. I also like it because it is a pretty strict-in most cases- Formal Equivalence translation (word for word, like KJV and, I think, the DRB). The archaic thee’s and thou’s etc. for some reason I enjoy :). I also like that its in the public domain now, copyright ran out.
 
I like the ASV’s NT because it uses Westcott-Hort Greek instead of the Received Text. I also like it because it is a pretty strict-in most cases- Formal Equivalence translation (word for word, like KJV and, I think, the DRB). The archaic thee’s and thou’s etc. for some reason I enjoy :). I also like that its in the public domain now, copyright ran out.
an advantage with archaic language is “ye” which is second person plural. Something modern English lacks.
 
Just a side note on the versions, the Revised Standard Version (RSV) is a revision of the King James Version, not the ASV.🙂
 
Just a side note on the versions, the Revised Standard Version (RSV) is a revision of the King James Version, not the ASV.🙂
Not so…

The Revised Version (1881) is a revision of the King James Version.

The R.V. team was made up of British and American scholars. It was a British project so any American suggestions had to voted on by the British. If the suggestions got a 2/3rd vote it would be incorporated into the text. If not, it would be added to the appendix. They also allowed the Americans to print their own version in 20 years.

Twenty years later, the American scholars published the American Standard Version (1901). This was the R.V. with the American suggestions incorporated into the text.

Then the International Council of Religious Studies (now called the National Council of Church) revised the A.S.V. and in 1952 the Revised Standard Version was finished

So the revision pedigree starting from the KJV can go:

KJV > RV
KJV > ASV > RSV > NRSV
KJV > ASV > RSV > ESV
KJV > ASV > NASB
KJV > NKJV

bible-researcher.com/asv.html
bible-researcher.com/rsv.html

👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top