1Co 11:27 Disproves Transubstantiation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheMese
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Fundamentalists are stumped. St. Paul is giving an unjust penalty for profaning a mere symbol. A person risks getting physically sick by partaking of the Lord unworthily. Symbols cannot do this.
It would like getting a viral infection from eating pictures of a virus. Only a “real” virus can make you ill.
 
Karl Keating in his book **Catholicism and Fundamentalism **says “‘Plain and simple reason’, observed Nicholas Cardinal Wiseman more than a century ago in his lectures on the Real Presence, ‘Seems to tell us that the presence of Christ’s body is necessary for an offense committed against it. A man cannot be ‘guilty of majesty’ unless the majesty exists in the object against which his crime is committed. In like manner, an offender against the Blessed Eucharist cannot be described as guilty of Christ’s Body and Blood, if these be not present in the Sacrament’.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top